getting a little desperate arn't you ? if you don't belive the hospital records from palins time in office show them to be wrong !
On Sep 25, 5:08 pm, jgg1000a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No mike, you post proof of a "claim of proof"... The claim of proof > may or may not be true... That you do not see or refuse to see this > fine point makes you the brain dead one around here... > > On Sep 25, 3:28 pm, "mike532 [ Republicans for Obama ]" > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > are you fucking brain dead ? i posted proof that wasila charged rape > > vcitims for colecting the evidence that they had been raped while > > palin was mayor ! > > > On Sep 25, 11:53 am, voxitar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Thanks for absolutely CONFIRMING what everyone who isn't a Palin SMEAR > > > merchant knew - Palin had NOTHING to do with charging victims for rape > > > kits. Neither did the city or the Police Department. If a rape > > > victim was charged for a rape kit it was done by the HOSPITAL - unless > > > you're going to claim that Palin was directly responsible for the > > > accounting and billing practices of the hospital? > > > > The budget game is smoke and mirrors, too - I checked it out myself - > > > in 1997, the contractual services budget for the Wasilla PD was $3605; > > > in 1998 it was INCREASED to $3800; in 1999 it was INCREASED to > > > $4200...there was a reduction in 2000 to $1000. Unless you're going > > > to make the case that Palin decided in the year 2000 to not pay for > > > rape kits (which makes no sense, since that was the year the Alaska > > > state law went into effect requiring law enforcement agencies to pay > > > for them), the Palin rape kit smear is OFFICIALLY DEBUNKED. > > > > Next smear, please! > > > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 8:37 AM, mike532 [ Republicans for Obama ] > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > you said there no records of rape victums being charged for rape kits > > > > using a quote this web > > > > site . > > > >http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jacob-alperinsheriff/sarah-palin-instit... > > > > as can be seen when you read the next paragraph that isn't > > > > true . [ On Sunday, CNN's Jessica Yellin claimed > > > > to have found no evidence in > > > > city records that Sarah Palin was aware that sexual assault victims > > > > were being billed for forensic testing. Also, a document released by > > > > the City of Wasilla stated that a thorough investigation turned up no > > > > records of any bills ever having been sent out for the cost of > > > > forensic tests either to victims or to their insurance companies. > > > > > But these investigators weren't looking in the right place. > > > > > During consideration of HB 270, the law Alaska legislators passed to > > > > ban the practice of billing sexual assault victims for forensic > > > > testing, Lauree Hugonin, then-Director of the Alaska Network on > > > > Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault (ANDVSA), reported that the > > > > charges "resulted from the accounting procedures at the hospitals and > > > > not the law enforcement agencies" so it was the hospitals and not the > > > > City of Wasilla that was sending out the actual bills. And it was > > > > during Palin's administration that hospitals began sending those > > > > bills > > > > to the victims and their insurance companies rather than to the > > > > police > > > > department. > > > > > Earlier, I too muddied the waters in my reporting lat week on the > > > > budget documents that confirm the timeline. I mistakenly claimed that > > > > the exams were paid for by the Wasilla Police Department under the > > > > "contingency funding" category of the budget when the exams were > > > > actually covered by the "contractual services" line item. > > > > > The budget for the police department's first full fiscal year, FY94, > > > > (July 1st, 1993-June 30th, 1994; available here in PDF form) > > > > explained > > > > that contractual services were "costs for medical blood tests for > > > > intoxicated drivers & medical exam/evidence collection for sexual > > > > assaults." > > > > > That is the line Palin slashed by 75 percent. It is clear, Palin was > > > > either aware of the cut and approved it or she was negligent. The > > > > evidence favors the former conclusion. Even as the 2000 Wasilla > > > > budget > > > > was being submitted, Alaska lawmakers were debating the legislation > > > > that would ban the practice of billing the victims. As quoted by CNN, > > > > Palin's Deputy Mayor said Palin "would review each department's > > > > budget > > > > line by line." And as noted in the original post below, the police > > > > chief Palin put in power, Fannon, was a strong advocate of the > > > > practice of billing the victims and a noted outspoken critic of the > > > > legislation that ended the practice. As he told the Mat-Su Valley > > > > Frontiersman, "I just don't want to see any more burden put on the > > > > taxpayer." ] > > > > > oh and before i forget fuck you ! > > > > > On Sep 25, 10:29 am, voxitar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 8:22 AM, mike532 [ Republicans for Obama ] > > > > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >> > " LMAO! You're SUCH a pathetic, LYING scumbag " > > > >> > it would seem that discription fits you sunshine . you posted > > > >> > distorted facts about Warsila charging for rape kits when palin was > > > >> > mayor > > > > >> Cite the "distorted fact," otherwise you're just a low-life lying > > > >> scumbag like your scumbag friend.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
