No mike, you post proof of a "claim of proof"... The claim of proof may or may not be true... That you do not see or refuse to see this fine point makes you the brain dead one around here...
On Sep 25, 3:28 pm, "mike532 [ Republicans for Obama ]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > are you fucking brain dead ? i posted proof that wasila charged rape > vcitims for colecting the evidence that they had been raped while > palin was mayor ! > > On Sep 25, 11:53 am, voxitar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thanks for absolutely CONFIRMING what everyone who isn't a Palin SMEAR > > merchant knew - Palin had NOTHING to do with charging victims for rape > > kits. Neither did the city or the Police Department. If a rape > > victim was charged for a rape kit it was done by the HOSPITAL - unless > > you're going to claim that Palin was directly responsible for the > > accounting and billing practices of the hospital? > > > The budget game is smoke and mirrors, too - I checked it out myself - > > in 1997, the contractual services budget for the Wasilla PD was $3605; > > in 1998 it was INCREASED to $3800; in 1999 it was INCREASED to > > $4200...there was a reduction in 2000 to $1000. Unless you're going > > to make the case that Palin decided in the year 2000 to not pay for > > rape kits (which makes no sense, since that was the year the Alaska > > state law went into effect requiring law enforcement agencies to pay > > for them), the Palin rape kit smear is OFFICIALLY DEBUNKED. > > > Next smear, please! > > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 8:37 AM, mike532 [ Republicans for Obama ] > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > you said there no records of rape victums being charged for rape kits > > > using a quote this web > > > site . > > >http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jacob-alperinsheriff/sarah-palin-instit... > > > as can be seen when you read the next paragraph that isn't > > > true . [ On Sunday, CNN's Jessica Yellin claimed > > > to have found no evidence in > > > city records that Sarah Palin was aware that sexual assault victims > > > were being billed for forensic testing. Also, a document released by > > > the City of Wasilla stated that a thorough investigation turned up no > > > records of any bills ever having been sent out for the cost of > > > forensic tests either to victims or to their insurance companies. > > > > But these investigators weren't looking in the right place. > > > > During consideration of HB 270, the law Alaska legislators passed to > > > ban the practice of billing sexual assault victims for forensic > > > testing, Lauree Hugonin, then-Director of the Alaska Network on > > > Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault (ANDVSA), reported that the > > > charges "resulted from the accounting procedures at the hospitals and > > > not the law enforcement agencies" so it was the hospitals and not the > > > City of Wasilla that was sending out the actual bills. And it was > > > during Palin's administration that hospitals began sending those > > > bills > > > to the victims and their insurance companies rather than to the > > > police > > > department. > > > > Earlier, I too muddied the waters in my reporting lat week on the > > > budget documents that confirm the timeline. I mistakenly claimed that > > > the exams were paid for by the Wasilla Police Department under the > > > "contingency funding" category of the budget when the exams were > > > actually covered by the "contractual services" line item. > > > > The budget for the police department's first full fiscal year, FY94, > > > (July 1st, 1993-June 30th, 1994; available here in PDF form) > > > explained > > > that contractual services were "costs for medical blood tests for > > > intoxicated drivers & medical exam/evidence collection for sexual > > > assaults." > > > > That is the line Palin slashed by 75 percent. It is clear, Palin was > > > either aware of the cut and approved it or she was negligent. The > > > evidence favors the former conclusion. Even as the 2000 Wasilla > > > budget > > > was being submitted, Alaska lawmakers were debating the legislation > > > that would ban the practice of billing the victims. As quoted by CNN, > > > Palin's Deputy Mayor said Palin "would review each department's > > > budget > > > line by line." And as noted in the original post below, the police > > > chief Palin put in power, Fannon, was a strong advocate of the > > > practice of billing the victims and a noted outspoken critic of the > > > legislation that ended the practice. As he told the Mat-Su Valley > > > Frontiersman, "I just don't want to see any more burden put on the > > > taxpayer." ] > > > > oh and before i forget fuck you ! > > > > On Sep 25, 10:29 am, voxitar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 8:22 AM, mike532 [ Republicans for Obama ] > > > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > " LMAO! You're SUCH a pathetic, LYING scumbag " > > >> > it would seem that discription fits you sunshine . you posted > > >> > distorted facts about Warsila charging for rape kits when palin was > > >> > mayor > > > >> Cite the "distorted fact," otherwise you're just a low-life lying > > >> scumbag like your scumbag friend.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
