Yes and the really sad thing is they are rounding them up in Chicago and bringing them to Ohio.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Zebnick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PoliticalForum" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 5:35 PM Subject: Re: Step Into The Light Democrats Democrats in Ohio are rounding up homeless people and paying them to register and vote for Obama. Pitiful and completely illegal. Not that it bothers Democrats to commit election fraud. On Oct 2, 2:03 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am starting to believe that the Liberals around here don't give a > shit... > > All they want is to get the Presidency and both Houses of Congress, no > matter what. > > And then we wonder how we get into the shit we do... > > On Oct 2, 6:30 am, "Keith In Tampa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I don't know if this helps or not, but to try and clarify or to at least > > add > > to the history of how this debacle started; > > > First, the "Fannie Mae" that was created in 1938 by President Roosevelt > > is > > not at all the same Fannie Mae that was created in 1968 by Lyndon > > Johnson, > > nor does the 1968 "Fannie Mae" resemble the Fannie Mae that was created > > in > > 1996-1999 by the Clinton Administration. Just a quick "Reader's Digest" > > abridged version; In 1968, President Johnson privatized Fannie Mae in > > order > > to remove it from the national budget. At this point, Fannie Mae began > > operating as a "quasi-governmental" corporation, (called a "government > > sponsored enterprise") which generated profits for stock holders while > > enjoying the benefits of exemption from taxation and oversight as well > > as > > implied government backing. Freddie Mac was created in 1970 in order to > > prevent any monopolization of the GSE market. > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fannie_Mae > > > The Fannie Mae that we are talking about in 2008, was in fact a creation > > of > > the Clinton Administration, and the 105th and 106th Congress. One of the > > biggest changes to Fannie Mae, as well as the overall banking industry > > came > > in 1996 when Alan Greenspan issued a ruling allowing bank investment > > affiliates to have up to a quarter of their business in investments. > > >http://www.nerepublican.com/index.php/2008/09/22/mules-rinos-and-very... > > > In particular, President Clinton, in essence, repealed the > > "Glass-Steagall" Act, and as I am sure most group members recall, (as I > > do) > > the theory was, that America's financial competitiveness was being > > hampered > > in comparison to Europe's and the emerging economies of Russia and > > China. > > That we needed the "Gramm-Leach-Bliley" Act, in order to make America's > > lending institutions viable and competitive. > > > If you go and look at other posts in this thread, by me, and other > > members, > > I think the rest of the history falls into place.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
