Gaar,

Such is life.

On Oct 2, 5:59 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You seem to beleieve it hasn't already been done...
>
> The wheels of Justice turn ever so slowly.
>
> On Oct 2, 3:55 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Gaar,
>
> > Why show me? I advised you to present your evidence to the proper
> > authorities. Am I the proper authority? Get on it lad, times a-
> > wasting, there are evil-doers to be exposed.
> > Jump on it, y vaya con Dios.
>
> > On Oct 2, 5:29 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2008/10/ohio_vote_fraud.php
>
> > > Early voting is taking place in Ohio. Through the end of the week,
> > > people can register and vote on the same day. The Ohio Secretary of
> > > State Jennifer Brunner argues that they are merely "casting their
> > > ballot" rather than "voting" so the fact that Ohio statute requires 30
> > > days between registering and voting would not interfere.
>
> > > So here is what is happening today. People are showing up to register
> > > and vote. There is no affirmative evidence that these people have not
> > > registered or voted somewhere else. There is no control. Normally in
> > > an election, partisan election monitors are allowed into polling
> > > places so that they can police each other. But not in two counties,
> > > Franklin and Montgomery, in Ohio. Brunner also issued an advisory
> > > opinion to counties saying that they are not required to allow
> > > election monitors.
>
> > > Here you can see an election observer be turned away.
>
> > > (Video at Link provided)  Which I believe is empirical evidence, of
> > > the First Order.
>
> > > On Oct 2, 3:19 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Gaar,
>
> > > > Why wait? Turn your evidence in to the appropiate authorities right
> > > > now. They can at least issue an emergency restraining order and put a
> > > > stop to the practice right now. Go, run, hurry. Do your duty as a
> > > > citizen.
>
> > > > On Oct 2, 4:39 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Yeah, I heard that this last night...
>
> > > > > The bad thing is, there will not likely be a Court challenge to this
> > > > > until AFTER they have stolen the Election.
>
> > > > > On Oct 2, 2:35 pm, Zebnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Democrats in Ohio are rounding up homeless people and paying them to
> > > > > > register and vote for Obama. Pitiful and completely illegal. Not 
> > > > > > that
> > > > > > it bothers Democrats to commit election fraud.
>
> > > > > > On Oct 2, 2:03 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > I am starting to believe that the Liberals around here don't give 
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > shit...
>
> > > > > > > All they want is to get the Presidency and both Houses of 
> > > > > > > Congress, no
> > > > > > > matter what.
>
> > > > > > > And then we wonder how we get into the shit we do...
>
> > > > > > > On Oct 2, 6:30 am, "Keith In Tampa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > I don't know if this helps or not, but to try and clarify or to 
> > > > > > > > at least add
> > > > > > > > to the history of how this debacle started;
>
> > > > > > > > First, the "Fannie Mae" that was created in 1938 by President 
> > > > > > > > Roosevelt is
> > > > > > > > not at all the same Fannie Mae that was created in 1968 by 
> > > > > > > > Lyndon Johnson,
> > > > > > > > nor does the 1968 "Fannie Mae" resemble the  Fannie Mae that 
> > > > > > > > was created in
> > > > > > > > 1996-1999 by the Clinton Administration.  Just a quick 
> > > > > > > > "Reader's Digest"
> > > > > > > > abridged version; In 1968, President Johnson privatized Fannie 
> > > > > > > > Mae in order
> > > > > > > > to remove it from the national budget. At this point, Fannie 
> > > > > > > > Mae began
> > > > > > > > operating as a "quasi-governmental" corporation, (called a 
> > > > > > > > "government
> > > > > > > > sponsored enterprise") which generated profits for stock 
> > > > > > > > holders while
> > > > > > > > enjoying the benefits of exemption from taxation and oversight 
> > > > > > > > as well as
> > > > > > > > implied government backing. Freddie Mac was created in 1970 in 
> > > > > > > > order to
> > > > > > > > prevent any monopolization of the GSE market.
>
> > > > > > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fannie_Mae
>
> > > > > > > >  The Fannie Mae that we are talking about in 2008, was in fact 
> > > > > > > > a creation of
> > > > > > > > the Clinton Administration, and the 105th and 106th Congress.   
> > > > > > > > One of the
> > > > > > > > biggest changes to Fannie Mae, as well as the overall banking 
> > > > > > > > industry came
> > > > > > > > in 1996 when Alan Greenspan issued a ruling allowing bank 
> > > > > > > > investment
> > > > > > > > affiliates to have up to a quarter of their business in 
> > > > > > > > investments.
>
> > > > > > > >http://www.nerepublican.com/index.php/2008/09/22/mules-rinos-and-very...
>
> > > > > > > >  In particular, President Clinton, in essence,  repealed the
> > > > > > > > "Glass-Steagall" Act, and as I am sure most group members  
> > > > > > > > recall, (as I do)
> > > > > > > > the theory was, that America's financial competitiveness was 
> > > > > > > > being hampered
> > > > > > > > in comparison to Europe's and the emerging economies of Russia 
> > > > > > > > and China.
> > > > > > > > That we needed the "Gramm-Leach-Bliley" Act, in order to make 
> > > > > > > > America's
> > > > > > > > lending institutions viable and competitive.
>
> > > > > > > > If you go and look at other posts in this thread, by me, and 
> > > > > > > > other members,
> > > > > > > > I think the rest of the history falls into place.- Hide quoted 
> > > > > > > > text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to