Gaar, Why in the fucking hell do you think I suggested you send your evidence to the proper authorites? Are you a complete idiot? IF THEY ARE DOING WHAT YOU CLAIM THEY ARE AND IT VIOLATES STATE OR FEDERAL ELECTION LAWS BY ALL MEANS PROSECUTE THEM TO THE FULLEST EXTENT OF THE LAW.
Now, is that clear enough to get thru your thick skull??? What the fuck is wrong with you anyway? On Oct 2, 6:18 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So you do or don't agree with their tactics? > > On Oct 2, 4:14 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Gaar, > > > What the fuck are you babbling about now? Hell, I advised you to turn > > them in to the proper authorites for prosecution if they were breaking > > the law. > > THAT'S showing support? What fucking planet are you from? > > > On Oct 2, 6:09 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Yeah... > > > > I was simply SHOWING YOU the tactics those YOU support are taking in > > > this Election. > > > > Not surprising to me you would support such people. > > > > Also not surprising you don't care to Learn about the things that you > > > support. > > > > On Oct 2, 4:01 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Gaar, > > > > > Such is life. > > > > > On Oct 2, 5:59 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > You seem to beleieve it hasn't already been done... > > > > > > The wheels of Justice turn ever so slowly. > > > > > > On Oct 2, 3:55 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Gaar, > > > > > > > Why show me? I advised you to present your evidence to the proper > > > > > > authorities. Am I the proper authority? Get on it lad, times a- > > > > > > wasting, there are evil-doers to be exposed. > > > > > > Jump on it, y vaya con Dios. > > > > > > > On Oct 2, 5:29 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > >http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2008/10/ohio_vote_fraud.php > > > > > > > > Early voting is taking place in Ohio. Through the end of the week, > > > > > > > people can register and vote on the same day. The Ohio Secretary > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > State Jennifer Brunner argues that they are merely "casting their > > > > > > > ballot" rather than "voting" so the fact that Ohio statute > > > > > > > requires 30 > > > > > > > days between registering and voting would not interfere. > > > > > > > > So here is what is happening today. People are showing up to > > > > > > > register > > > > > > > and vote. There is no affirmative evidence that these people have > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > registered or voted somewhere else. There is no control. Normally > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > an election, partisan election monitors are allowed into polling > > > > > > > places so that they can police each other. But not in two > > > > > > > counties, > > > > > > > Franklin and Montgomery, in Ohio. Brunner also issued an advisory > > > > > > > opinion to counties saying that they are not required to allow > > > > > > > election monitors. > > > > > > > > Here you can see an election observer be turned away. > > > > > > > > (Video at Link provided) Which I believe is empirical evidence, > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > the First Order. > > > > > > > > On Oct 2, 3:19 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Gaar, > > > > > > > > > Why wait? Turn your evidence in to the appropiate authorities > > > > > > > > right > > > > > > > > now. They can at least issue an emergency restraining order and > > > > > > > > put a > > > > > > > > stop to the practice right now. Go, run, hurry. Do your duty as > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > citizen. > > > > > > > > > On Oct 2, 4:39 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, I heard that this last night... > > > > > > > > > > The bad thing is, there will not likely be a Court challenge > > > > > > > > > to this > > > > > > > > > until AFTER they have stolen the Election. > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 2, 2:35 pm, Zebnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Democrats in Ohio are rounding up homeless people and > > > > > > > > > > paying them to > > > > > > > > > > register and vote for Obama. Pitiful and completely > > > > > > > > > > illegal. Not that > > > > > > > > > > it bothers Democrats to commit election fraud. > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 2, 2:03 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I am starting to believe that the Liberals around here > > > > > > > > > > > don't give a > > > > > > > > > > > shit... > > > > > > > > > > > > All they want is to get the Presidency and both Houses of > > > > > > > > > > > Congress, no > > > > > > > > > > > matter what. > > > > > > > > > > > > And then we wonder how we get into the shit we do... > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 2, 6:30 am, "Keith In Tampa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't know if this helps or not, but to try and > > > > > > > > > > > > clarify or to at least add > > > > > > > > > > > > to the history of how this debacle started; > > > > > > > > > > > > > First, the "Fannie Mae" that was created in 1938 by > > > > > > > > > > > > President Roosevelt is > > > > > > > > > > > > not at all the same Fannie Mae that was created in 1968 > > > > > > > > > > > > by Lyndon Johnson, > > > > > > > > > > > > nor does the 1968 "Fannie Mae" resemble the Fannie Mae > > > > > > > > > > > > that was created in > > > > > > > > > > > > 1996-1999 by the Clinton Administration. Just a quick > > > > > > > > > > > > "Reader's Digest" > > > > > > > > > > > > abridged version; In 1968, President Johnson privatized > > > > > > > > > > > > Fannie Mae in order > > > > > > > > > > > > to remove it from the national budget. At this point, > > > > > > > > > > > > Fannie Mae began > > > > > > > > > > > > operating as a "quasi-governmental" corporation, > > > > > > > > > > > > (called a "government > > > > > > > > > > > > sponsored enterprise") which generated profits for > > > > > > > > > > > > stock holders while > > > > > > > > > > > > enjoying the benefits of exemption from taxation and > > > > > > > > > > > > oversight as well as > > > > > > > > > > > > implied government backing. Freddie Mac was created in > > > > > > > > > > > > 1970 in order to > > > > > > > > > > > > prevent any monopolization of the GSE market. > > > > > > > > > > > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fannie_Mae > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Fannie Mae that we are talking about in 2008, was > > > > > > > > > > > > in fact a creation of > > > > > > > > > > > > the Clinton Administration, and the 105th and 106th > > > > > > > > > > > > Congress. One of the > > > > > > > > > > > > biggest changes to Fannie Mae, as well as the overall > > > > > > > > > > > > banking industry came > > > > > > > > > > > > in 1996 when Alan Greenspan issued a ruling allowing > > > > > > > > > > > > bank investment > > > > > > > > > > > > affiliates to have up to a quarter of their business in > > > > > > > > > > > > investments. > > > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.nerepublican.com/index.php/2008/09/22/mules-rinos-and-very... > > > > > > > > > > > > > In particular, President Clinton, in essence, > > > > > > > > > > > > repealed the > > > > > > > > > > > > "Glass-Steagall" Act, and as I am sure most group > > > > > > > > > > > > members recall, (as I do) > > > > > > > > > > > > the theory was, that America's financial > > > > > > > > > > > > competitiveness was being hampered > > > > > > > > > > > > in comparison to Europe's and the emerging economies of > > > > > > > > > > > > Russia and China. > > > > > > > > > > > > That we needed the "Gramm-Leach-Bliley" Act, in order > > > > > > > > > > > > to make America's > > > > > > > > > > > > lending institutions viable and competitive. > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you go and look at other posts in this thread, by > > > > > > > > > > > > me, and other members, > > > > > > > > > > > > I think the rest of the history falls into place.- Hide > > > > > > > > > > > > quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
