American capitalism is alive and well, and it won't be dying-off any time soon. Americans now need to decide whether it is best to elect a President who will nurture the world's preferred economic system, or one whose passion it is to weaken it. "
Preferred by whom? The exploiters of the world’s people, well I am sure they prefer it, someone in Ethiopia may have a different opinion obout starving to death for someone else’s profit’s and gee, I'd hate to see it when it was about to collapse if you call this well. Good to see Obama is a Socialist; no doubt he will expropriate the means of production and put it in the hands of the working class, enact laws to take education and health care out of the hands of corporations, nationalize them and make them free for all. All banks will be amalgamated into one state bank with fixed low interest rates. He will pull out of all war of imperialist aggression and disband the armed forces replacing them with the people’s militia--the red army After he has done all this, he will then step down from the presidency and put the control of humanity in the hands of humanity itself. How can I get to vote for him? On Oct 13, 2:01 am, "Keith In Tampa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > *Why Not A Dramatic Tax Increase On 'Rich People?" Ask Obama* > > by Austin Hill > Sunday, October 12, 2008 > > http://townhall.com/Columnists/AustinHill/2008/10/12/why_not_a_dramat... > > [Q] "For most of his nearly 21-month presidential campaign, Senator Obama > has made a cottage industry out of hating free market enterprise. He has > proposed governmental limits on corporate executive salaries. He has > repeatedly expressed indignation over "excessive" corporate profits. He has > promised to "reign-in" free trade, and has promised to instill "economic > justice" in America (he has never clarified what he means when he says > "economic justice," but he has made it clear that America's economy is > necessarily unjust). > > And more than any other economic idea, Obama has throughout his campaign > reiterated that it is time to end "Bush's tax cuts for the rich." The term > itself is misleading, in as much as earlier this decade President Bush and > the U.S. Congress cut taxes across the board, not merely for "rich people." > But never mind the facts, Obama has hit political homeruns by putting a > bullseye on the backs of America's highest income earners. > > Yet last week Obama backed-off from eliminating Bush's dastardly "tax cuts > for the rich," insisting that, because of Bush's ailing economy, it won't be > feasible to raise taxes on the wealthy right away. But why not? His sudden > change of heart tells us two things: A) some significant portion of the > American electorate is NOT enchanted by his politics of class warfare and > envy; and B) just like those of the world's finance ministers, the instincts > of many Americans lead them to understand that wealth creation and > productivity comes from the private sector, not from government - - not even > from an Obama government. > > American capitalism is alive and well, and it won't be dying-off any time > soon. Americans now need to decide whether it is best to elect a President > who will nurture the world's preferred economic system, or one whose passion > it is to weaken it. " > > http://townhall.com/Columnists/AustinHill/2008/10/12/why_not_a_dramat... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
