*Why Not A Dramatic Tax Increase On 'Rich People?" Ask Obama*

by Austin Hill
Sunday, October 12, 2008

http://townhall.com/Columnists/AustinHill/2008/10/12/why_not_a_dramatic_tax_increase_on_rich_people__ask_obama?page=full&comments=true

[Q] "For most of his nearly 21-month presidential campaign, Senator Obama
has made a cottage industry out of hating free market enterprise. He has
proposed governmental limits on corporate executive salaries. He has
repeatedly expressed indignation over "excessive" corporate profits. He has
promised to "reign-in" free trade, and has promised to instill "economic
justice" in America (he has never clarified what he means when he says
"economic justice," but he has made it clear that America's economy is
necessarily unjust).

And more than any other economic idea, Obama has throughout his campaign
reiterated that it is time to end "Bush's tax cuts for the rich." The term
itself is misleading, in as much as earlier this decade President Bush and
the U.S. Congress cut taxes across the board, not merely for "rich people."
But never mind the facts, Obama has hit political homeruns by putting a
bullseye on the backs of America's highest income earners.

Yet last week Obama backed-off from eliminating Bush's dastardly "tax cuts
for the rich," insisting that, because of Bush's ailing economy, it won't be
feasible to raise taxes on the wealthy right away. But why not? His sudden
change of heart tells us two things: A) some significant portion of the
American electorate is NOT enchanted by his politics of class warfare and
envy; and B) just like those of the world's finance ministers, the instincts
of many Americans lead them to understand that wealth creation and
productivity comes from the private sector, not from government - - not even
from an Obama government.

American capitalism is alive and well, and it won't be dying-off any time
soon. Americans now need to decide whether it is best to elect a President
who will nurture the world's preferred economic system, or one whose passion
it is to weaken it. "

http://townhall.com/Columnists/AustinHill/2008/10/12/why_not_a_dramatic_tax_increase_on_rich_people__ask_obama?page=2

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to