This recession may last 7 years like the one in 1843 which pretty much
ends the miracle rescue.

On Oct 12, 4:41 pm, "\"Lone Wolf\"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> American capitalism is alive and well, and it won't be dying-off any
> time
> soon. Americans now need to decide whether it is best to elect a
> President
> who will nurture the world's preferred economic system, or one whose
> passion
> it is to weaken it. "
>
> Preferred by whom? The exploiters of the world’s people, well I am
> sure they prefer it, someone in Ethiopia may have a different opinion
> obout starving to death for someone else’s profit’s  and gee, I'd hate
> to see it when it was about to collapse if you call this well.
>
> Good to see Obama is a Socialist; no doubt he will expropriate the
> means of production and put it in the hands of the working class,
> enact laws to take education and health care out of the hands of
> corporations, nationalize them and make them free for all. All banks
> will be amalgamated into one state bank with fixed low interest rates.
>
> He will pull out of all war of imperialist aggression and disband the
> armed forces replacing them with the people’s militia--the red army
>
> After he has done all this, he will then step down from the presidency
> and put the control of humanity in the hands of humanity itself.
>
> How can I get to vote for him?
>
> On Oct 13, 2:01 am, "Keith In Tampa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> >  *Why Not A Dramatic Tax Increase On 'Rich People?" Ask Obama*
>
> > by Austin Hill
> > Sunday, October 12, 2008
>
> >http://townhall.com/Columnists/AustinHill/2008/10/12/why_not_a_dramat...
>
> > [Q] "For most of his nearly 21-month presidential campaign, Senator Obama
> > has made a cottage industry out of hating free market enterprise. He has
> > proposed governmental limits on corporate executive salaries. He has
> > repeatedly expressed indignation over "excessive" corporate profits. He has
> > promised to "reign-in" free trade, and has promised to instill "economic
> > justice" in America (he has never clarified what he means when he says
> > "economic justice," but he has made it clear that America's economy is
> > necessarily unjust).
>
> > And more than any other economic idea, Obama has throughout his campaign
> > reiterated that it is time to end "Bush's tax cuts for the rich." The term
> > itself is misleading, in as much as earlier this decade President Bush and
> > the U.S. Congress cut taxes across the board, not merely for "rich people."
> > But never mind the facts, Obama has hit political homeruns by putting a
> > bullseye on the backs of America's highest income earners.
>
> > Yet last week Obama backed-off from eliminating Bush's dastardly "tax cuts
> > for the rich," insisting that, because of Bush's ailing economy, it won't be
> > feasible to raise taxes on the wealthy right away. But why not? His sudden
> > change of heart tells us two things: A) some significant portion of the
> > American electorate is NOT enchanted by his politics of class warfare and
> > envy; and B) just like those of the world's finance ministers, the instincts
> > of many Americans lead them to understand that wealth creation and
> > productivity comes from the private sector, not from government - - not even
> > from an Obama government.
>
> > American capitalism is alive and well, and it won't be dying-off any time
> > soon. Americans now need to decide whether it is best to elect a President
> > who will nurture the world's preferred economic system, or one whose passion
> > it is to weaken it. "
>
> >http://townhall.com/Columnists/AustinHill/2008/10/12/why_not_a_dramat...- 
> >Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to