gaar, Why thank you, as if i don't intend to say anything i like!
But MAAAAAW Hollywood did it FIRST!!!!!! LMFAO!! On Oct 23, 7:35 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Say anything you like holly... > > I was simply pointing out that you are, yet again, asking of others > things that you will not do yourself. > > I am free to point that out, just as you point out what you do, right? > > On Oct 23, 3:46 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > gaar, > > > The lad should not make accusations he can't back up. I'm supposed to > > NOT point that out? And THEN sit quietly if and when he says "see, you > > don't deny it!" > > You wish. > > > And I call Travis a hick, not a racist. Tell me, which is worse a > > "loony Liberal" or a "hick"? If you can call people "loony liberals" > > why can't I call Travis a "hick"? > > > HYPOCTITE. > > > On Oct 23, 2:56 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > holly, > > > > In other words he won't, for you... > > > > You attempt to, yet again, make people jump through your hoops, and > > > when they won't you claim some type of Victory, just like a Loony > > > Liberal. > > > > As for your "claim"... > > > > Anyone can plainly see you call Travis a Hick and a Racist all the > > > time here, and you do it to others as well... > > > > Seems you're the one with the Racist problem here. > > > > On Oct 23, 9:11 am, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Zeb, > > > > > In other words you can't. Just another Bush-Con with an alligator > > > > mouth and hummingbird balls. Punk. > > > > > On Oct 22, 11:01 pm, Zebnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Go fuck yourself, Holly. You inscesant word games are boring. You > > > > > amuse only yourself. > > > > > > On Oct 22, 7:48 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Zeb, > > > > > > > Feel free to list where I called people a racist soley for > > > > > > disagreeing > > > > > > with me. > > > > > > Please do so, show me your just not another big-mouth, all hat and > > > > > > no > > > > > > cattle. > > > > > > > On Oct 22, 2:05 pm, Zebnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Oh no, oh no!!! Does this mean I have to suffer the awful fate of > > > > > > > being labeled a racist by someone who labels everyone they > > > > > > > disagree > > > > > > > with a racist?? Whatever shall I do??? > > > > > > > > On Oct 22, 11:49 am, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Zeb, > > > > > > > > > Too late. > > > > > > > > > On Oct 22, 10:08 am, Zebnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > How would we know if Obama was a shoe shine boy? His past > > > > > > > > > seems to be > > > > > > > > > a Top Secret issue. > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 22, 11:04 am, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Zeb, > > > > > > > > > > > When was Sen. Obama ever a "shoe shine boy"? Your racism is > > > > > > > > > > showing > > > > > > > > > > "boy". > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 22, 9:21 am, Zebnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, getting a foreign born shoe shine boy and > > > > > > > > > > > feather brain is > > > > > > > > > > > NOT better. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 22, 6:23 am, WarpTen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > You have to admit it will be better than getting stuck > > > > > > > > > > > > with Dumb and > > > > > > > > > > > > Dumber! > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 21, 11:21 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It seems the only time he is required to "prove" he > > > > > > > > > > > > > is elidgible is > > > > > > > > > > > > > AFTER he has been Elected, according to the > > > > > > > > > > > > > Constitution... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So we are likely to be stuck with a President Biden, > > > > > > > > > > > > > should Obama Win. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 21, 4:22 pm, "d.b.baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > More, but different: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (HONOLULU, HI)(October 20, 2008) The leader of the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > national anti-Obama > > > > > > > > > > > > > > movement, legendary Chicago Internet columnist and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Obama author Andy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin, will hold a Honolulu news conference today, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > October 20, 2008 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to announce he has asked the Hawai’i Supreme Court > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to entertain an > > > > > > > > > > > > > > emergency writ expediting the release of Senator > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Barack Obama’s secret > > > > > > > > > > > > > > birth records. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A copy of the Petition will be posted on Martin’s > > > > > > > > > > > > > > blogs later today > > > > > > > > > > > > > > after it is docketed by the Supreme Court. The > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hawai’i Supreme Court > > > > > > > > > > > > > > petition supplements and expands on a lawsuit filed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Friday, October > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 18th in the Circuit Court of Hawai’i. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -http://contrariancommentary.wordpress.com/2008/10/20/hawai%E2%80%99i-... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In addition, a similar case is currently pending in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the state of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Washington. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2107660/posts > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 21, 6:25 pm, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it is unbelievable he refuses to release his > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > birth certificate. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it is unbelievable the liberal msm has passed on > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this huge story > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it is unbelievable that there are so many people > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who dismiss this as > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > no big deal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nah, on second though it really is believable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the fix is in people. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 21, 6:21 pm, "d.b.baker" <[EMAIL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Today's motion in "Berg v. Obama et al" re Rule > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 36 of the Federal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rules of Civil Procedure: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_R-l1iejogZw/SP1e1v9SEpI/AAAAAAAABJE/ICBQ2KK... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
