As a "Genocidal Conservative";  I think this just goes to show that the
government cannot mandate or regulate social behavior or morality.  It's
been tried and failed at each and every attempt.

​


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:35 AM, MJ <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> *"Herewith another and yet worse confession: I do not see, or care, why it
> is thought my duty to like, or dislike, groups because of their race,
> creed, color, sex, sexual aberration, or national origin. Nor do I think it
> their duty to like me. I especially do not understand why the federal
> government should decide with whom I ought to associate." *
> *"So what?" *
> *How do you like them apples? *By Fred Reed
> April 22, 2014
>
> I am puzzled as to why racism is thought to be a terrible thing, rather
> than entirely natural and often reasonable, and why people allow themselves
> to be brow-beaten about it. Maybe we should stop. Domestic tranquility
> would follow in torrents.
>
> As nearly as I can tell, a racist is one who approves of rigorous
> education, good English, civilized manners, minimal criminality, and
> responsible parenthood, among other things. I am, then, a racist. I see no
> reason to grovel about it.
>
> I decided long ago that if, while I was doing a radio interview, a
> caller-in told me, “You a *racist!”* I would hesitate as if puzzled, and
> say  “…So what?” This would add immeasurably to the planetary supply of
> stunned silence. The expectation is that anyone so charged will fall on his
> knees and beg for mercy. It would be a lesser offense to be caught sexually
> molesting autistic three-year-old girls while attending a Nazi torch-rally.
>
> Herewith another and yet worse confession: I do not see, or care, why it
> is thought my duty to like, or dislike, groups because of their race,
> creed, color, sex, sexual aberration, or national origin. Nor do I think it
> their duty to like me. I especially do not understand why the federal
> government should decide with whom I ought to associate.
>
> But back to “So what?” Among its charms is that there is no answer to it,
> other than huffing and puffing and indignant expostulation. All of these
> amuse me. Used frequently, “So what?”would shut up people who badly need to
> shut up, or else force them to think. Not likely, as most apparently cannot.
>
> Let us, improbably, glance at reality. A characteristic of human groups is
> that they do not like each other. The greater the difference between the
> groups, the greater the dislike; the closer the contact between them, the
> more open the friction. Note that before the advent of mass immigration,
> Americans of whatever politics had no dislike of Hispanics.
>
> Thus separation increases the likelihood of amity. Is this not obvious?
> The instinctive rancor between disparate groups accounts for most of the
> world’s problems. Moslems and Christians dislike each other, Tamils and
> Sinhalese, Cambodians and Vietnamese, blacks and whites, Americans and
> Frenchmen, men and women, homosexuals and the normal and, as Tom Lehrer
> famously sang, “…everybody hates the Jews.”
>
> Except that in America Jews are so assimilated that most of us don’t
> remember to hate them. They aren’t different enough. I’ll have to make
> myself a note.
>
> Humans like to be among their own kind. This can mean many things. It can
> be political. In Washington, white liberals cheerlead for diversity while
> spending their time exclusively with white liberals and execrating
> Southerners, Jesus Creepers, genocidal conservatives (understood to mean
> all conservatives), Catholics, racists, owners of guns, rednecks, and so
> on. No dissenting voices are heard because, like conservatives, liberals
> choose to be among their own. Similarly, if in any of Washington’s dives
> you know that one person in a table of six has an IQ in excess 130, it is a
> good bet that all do. It isn’t snobbery. Smart people enjoy the company of
> smart people. Their own kind. So what?
>
> If left alone, people will naturally and peacefully form such associations
> as seem to them desirable. If left alone. So what?
>
> The Chinese cluster together in China Towns because they want to be among
> their own. So what? Jews have yeshivas because they want to preserve their
> culture. So what? On campus, black students want separate fraternities and
> dormitories. So what? When men can find a pretext for being among other
> men, they do. So what?
>
> In all of this, I am a bit of an outlier, having lived among many cultures
> and generally liked them. Some can do this. Yet as a white American of
> European extraction, I too want to preserve my culture. This involves (or
> did) respect for law, studiousness, the production of children within
> marriage, self-reliance, honesty, sexual restraint, and so on. Another part
> of my cultural package is the literature of Milne, Milton, Twain,
> Galsworthy, Gibbon, and others at length. I want my children to read them
>
> However, I do not want to impose my values and culture on others. American
> blacks for example are truly *African *Americans, and quite reasonably
> may have as little interest in European history as I do in African.
> Rationally this would argue for separate schools where each could study
> what and as it chose. For reasons impenetrable to me, to suggest this is
> thought worse than genocide.
>
> A reason for letting people associate as they choose is that, while groups
> naturally do not like each other, they overlap in curious ways.  Left to
> themselves, people sort these matters out like water reaching its level.
> When I lived in Washington I used to spend afternoons over a Bass and
> several of its friends at the Cafe Asia, on Wilson Boulevard just across
> Key Bridge into Virginia. The Asia was then staffed by Asian girls­Malays,
> Chinese, Vietnamese, and a lovely Japanese woman who managed it. The
> clientele ran to young white professionals.
>
> Their unanimous opinion held of these women by white men was highly
> favorable. Why? Well, these young ladies­they *were* ladies–were sleek,
> pretty, classy, never toilet-mouthed, and smart. Smart: One was doing
> graduate work in computer security, another was a wide-area network
> engineer, a third had been unable to find work after a master’s in biochem,
> and so was in dental school.
>
> Here we have an example of people, being* left alone*, deciding *for
> themselves* who to hang out with. The young white professionals had
> decided, probably not consciously, that the Asian women had enough in
> common with us, and enough not in common but appealing, that we really
> enjoyed them.
>
> Where is the fly in this ointment? I suppose we were racists, as we were
> assuredly discriminating racially: We thought Malays pretty. The horror. No
> doubt we were sinners all.
>
> Today of course we are federally admonished not to choose our own friends
> and neighbors as if our lives were our own business.  No. Instead we must
> follow the social directives of the Potomac Soviet, whether anyone wants to
> or not. Few do. In Washington, on the Hill, upper Connecticut, the inner
> suburbs, the outer suburbs, everywhere, clubs and restaurants are either
> almost perfectly white or perfectly black. Whites happily patronize Latin
> American restaurants intended for the general trade, yet in mini-barrios
> many venues tacitly are for browns only. So what?  It is how people want
> it. If freedom of association is racism, I am for it.
>
> So what?
>
>  http://www.fredoneverything.net/LaudableRacism.shtml
>
> --
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to