​Good Morning MJ,

You are correct!  I won't waste any more time on anything else that you
write.  You can't fix stupid......

​


On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 10:34 AM, KeithInTampa <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I think that we had two threads going on the same subject matter at the
> same time, during this era.  At any rate, here is an excellent post from
> Mark "The Annointed One"
>
>
> On Friday, October 29, 2010 9:52:28 PM UTC-4, THE ANNOINTED ONE wrote:
>
>> The text of the ORIGINAL immigration law:
>>
>>
>> http://library.uwb.edu/guides/USimmigration/3%20stat%20488.pdf
>>
>>
>> Early records relating to immigration originated in regional
>> customhouses. The U.S. Customs Service conducted its business by
>> designating collection districts. Each district had a headquarters port
>> with a customhouse and a collector of customs, the chief officer of the
>> district.
>>
>> An act of March 2, 1819 (3 Stat. 489) required the captain or master of a
>> vessel arriving at a port in the United States or any of its territories
>> from a foreign country to submit a list of passengers to the collector of
>> customs, beginning January 1, 1820. The act also required that the
>> collector submit a quarterly report or abstract, consisting of copies of
>> these passenger lists, to the Secretary of State, who was required to
>> submit such information at each session of Congress. After 1874, collectors
>> forwarded only statistical reports to the Treasury Department. The lists
>> themselves were retained by the collector of customs. Customs records were
>> maintained primarily for statistical purposes.
>>
>> On August 3, 1882, Congress passed the first Federal law regulating
>> immigration (22 Stat. 214-215); the Secretary of the Treasury had general
>> supervision over it between 1882 and 1891. The Office of Superintendent of
>> Immigration in the Department of the Treasury was established under an act
>> of March 3, 1891 (26 Stat. 1085), and was later designated a bureau in 1895
>> with responsibility for administering the alien contract-labor laws. In
>> 1900 administration of the Chinese-exclusion laws was added. Initially the
>> Bureau retained the same administrative structure of ports of entry that
>> the Customs Service had used. By the turn of the century it began to
>> designate its own immigration districts, the numbers and boundaries of
>> which changed over the years.
>>
>> In 1903 the Bureau became part of the Department of Commerce and Labor;
>> its name was changed to the Bureau of Immigration and Naturalization when
>> functions relating to naturalization were added in 1906. In 1933 the
>> functions were transferred to the Department of Labor and became the
>> responsibility of the newly formed Immigration and Naturalization Service
>> (INS). Under President Roosevelt's Reorganization Plan V of 1940, the INS
>> was moved to the Department of Justice. The INS was abolished, and its
>> immigration and naturalization recordkeeping functions were transferred to
>> the new Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services within the new
>> Department of Homeland Security, established January 24, 2003, by the
>> Homeland Security Act of 2002 (116 Stat. 2135, 2205).
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> (Hey Jonathan!  I replied to your message, in the other thread
>>> captioned: "Constitutional Protections Against The Invasion of Illegal
>>> Aliens"
>>>
>>> Good to see ya!  Have a great weekend!
>>>
>>> Keith
>>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Jonathan Ashley <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Keith,
>>>>
>>>> You are stretching the definition of "invasion" beyond belief.
>>>>
>>>> 1828 definition:
>>>>
>>>> *INVASION*, n. s as z. [L. invasio, from invado. See Invade.]
>>>>  1. A hostile entrance into the possessions of another; particularly,
>>>> the entrance of a hostile army into a country for the purpose of conquest
>>>> or plunder, or the attack of a military force. The north of England and
>>>> south of Scotland were for centuries subject to invasion, each from the
>>>> other. The invasion of England by William the Norman, was in 1066. 2.
>>>> An attack on the rights of another; infringement or violation. 3.
>>>> Attack of a disease; as the invasion of the plague, in Egypt.
>>>>
>>>> However, in re-reading the Constitution, I did find the following in
>>>> Article I, Section 9:
>>>>
>>>> "The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now
>>>> existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the
>>>> Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a tax
>>>> or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for
>>>> each Person."
>>>>
>>>> So it appears the Supreme Court was correct in 1875. I stand corrected.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 10/29/2010 4:09 PM, Keith In Tampa wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I don't know how it is that you think the Constitution doesn't address
>>>> this.  The Constitution most certainly does address Immigration, and
>>>> illegal immigration!
>>>>
>>>> It's called naturalization, where Congress is vested with the power to
>>>> craft such laws, and illegal immigration is called, "Invasion".
>>>>
>>>> Plain and simple.
>>>>
>>>> See my post on this, all of the articles are listed in Article One,
>>>> Section Eight.  The Naturalization is in either Clause Three or Four, and
>>>> there are numerous Clauses addressing invasion, including one where the
>>>> State has the DUTY  (*See* Arizona)  to stop invasion from illegal
>>>> invaders into their State.
>>>>
>>>> The Constitution is not a living, breathing document, as many Moonbats,
>>>> (*See* Lil'MarxistMoonbatTommyTomTomForNews) suggests.....It's black
>>>> and white, plain and simple.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Jonathan Ashley <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> And that is how things were until 1875 when the Supreme Court
>>>>> declared that regulation of US immigration is the responsibility of the
>>>>> Federal Government - despite the fact that immigration is not mentioned in
>>>>> the Constitution.
>>>>>
>>>>> Our founding fathers had one intention and it took nearly one hundred
>>>>> years before the Supreme Court decided to arbitrarily change that 
>>>>> intention.
>>>>>
>>>>> Had it not been for the Supreme Court making law instead of upholding
>>>>> what the Constitution says, we would not be having discussions about
>>>>> illegal immigration.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/29/2010 3:39 PM, Keith In Tampa wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I think in 1791, under the circumstances that you describe, he would
>>>>> have been a citizen, and a part of, "We, The People".....
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Jonathan Ashley <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> That does not answer the question posed. If a person moved here from
>>>>>> France in 1791 with no intention of returning to France and every 
>>>>>> intention
>>>>>> of residing in Virginia, where does it say he is not a citizen of the
>>>>>> United States? Where does it say he is not a member of the body of "We 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> People" living in the United States in 1791?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/29/2010 3:15 PM, Keith In Tampa wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "We The People, Of the United States Of America"  is pretty self
>>>>>> explanatory.....
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Jonathan Ashley <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  While the word "citizen" appears quite often in the Constitution
>>>>>>> for the United States
>>>>>>> , it is never clearly defined.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If a person chose to move here from France in 1791, why would he
>>>>>>> not have been part of "We the People"?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 10/29/2010 10:53 AM, Keith In Tampa wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  That is one convoluted, and I might add, WRONG interpretation
>>>>>>> Michael.  "The People"  mean the Citizens of the United States.   Not
>>>>>>> illegals, not, "The People of France", etc., etc., etc....Numerous case 
>>>>>>> law
>>>>>>> citations on this very premise, again, I'll come back to it maybe 
>>>>>>> tonight.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Keith
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 1:41 PM, MJ <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Article III deals with the JUDICIARY.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There you go again with that silliness about 'illegals'.
>>>>>>>> Citizens relate (re: US Constitution) SPECIFICALLY as denoted.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Items like -- for example -- Amendment  IV (for simplicity)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses,
>>>>>>>>   papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,
>>>>>>>>   shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon
>>>>>>>>   probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly
>>>>>>>>   describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to
>>>>>>>>   be seized.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> restrict the GOVERNMENT from action against PEOPLE -- regardless of
>>>>>>>> whether they are Citizens, Visitors, have the Government's
>>>>>>>> unconstitutional
>>>>>>>> permission, etc.  It plainly LIMITS the Feds from doing as stated.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Naturalization (or naturalisation), of course, is the acquisition
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> citizenship and nationality by somebody who was not a citizen or
>>>>>>>> national of that country when he or she was born.
>>>>>>>> Naturalization has NOTHING to do with entering/exiting.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There was no claim that Citizens were something else.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regard$,
>>>>>>>> --MJ
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I was about to say that I'd hate to live in a country
>>>>>>>> where the law could mean whatever its rulers said
>>>>>>>> it meant, when it occurred to me that I already do.
>>>>>>>> -- Joseph Sobran
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> At 01:28 PM 10/29/2010, you wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Art. III referenced the Constitution and treaties, but was changed
>>>>>>>> by the XI amendment.  Citizens do not refer to illegals that roam onto 
>>>>>>>> U.S.
>>>>>>>> soil and do not become naturalized.
>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>> From: "MJ" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 1:14:13 PM
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Tea party antics could end up burning Republicans
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is becoming silly.  Have you actually READ the Constitution?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Occurrences of 'Citizen'
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In Article III (describing JURISDICTION for the supreme Court):
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   between a State and Citizens of another State; -- between
>>>>>>>> Citizens
>>>>>>>>   of different States; -- between Citizens of the same State
>>>>>>>> claiming Lands
>>>>>>>>   under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the
>>>>>>>> Citizens
>>>>>>>>   thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In Article IV (ensuring reciprocity between States):
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges
>>>>>>>>   and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Amendment XI (more jurisdiction):
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed
>>>>>>>> to extend to
>>>>>>>>   any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of
>>>>>>>> the United
>>>>>>>>   States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects
>>>>>>>> of any
>>>>>>>>   Foreign State.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dubiously Ratified Amendment XIV (aiding Lincoln's illusion):
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and
>>>>>>>>   subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United
>>>>>>>> States and
>>>>>>>>   of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce
>>>>>>>> any law
>>>>>>>>   which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of
>>>>>>>> the United
>>>>>>>>   States;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Amendment XV (preventing voting disqualification by group):
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be
>>>>>>>>   denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on
>>>>>>>> account of
>>>>>>>>   race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Amendment XIX (preventing voting disqualification by group)"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be
>>>>>>>> denied or
>>>>>>>>   abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Amendment XIV (preventing voting disqualification by group):
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any
>>>>>>>>   primary or other election for President or Vice President, for
>>>>>>>> electors for
>>>>>>>>   President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in
>>>>>>>>   Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or
>>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>   State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Amendment XXVI (preventing voting disqualification by group):
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen
>>>>>>>>   years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>   United States or by any State on account of age.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The Constitution, of course, CREATED and LIMITS the Government it
>>>>>>>> created.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> STILL do not know what the Bible has to do with anything.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regard$,
>>>>>>>> --MJ
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal
>>>>>>>> government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State
>>>>>>>> governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised
>>>>>>>> principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and 
>>>>>>>> foreign
>>>>>>>> commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most 
>>>>>>>> part, be
>>>>>>>> connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to 
>>>>>>>> all the
>>>>>>>> objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives,
>>>>>>>> liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order,
>>>>>>>> improvement, and prosperity of the State. -- James Madison, Federalist
>>>>>>>> Papers
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> At 12:53 PM 10/29/2010, you wrote:
>>>>>>>>  Look at Romans 1:26-27.  Also the Constitution and the amendments
>>>>>>>> refer to citizens.  Citizens  are all persons born or naturalized in 
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> U.S. and subject to the jurisdiction therein. Clearly it does not 
>>>>>>>> apply to
>>>>>>>> illegals.
>>>>>>>>  ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>> From: "MJ" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 12:01:43 PM
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Tea party antics could end up burning Republicans
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> THIS does not answer the request.
>>>>>>>> Someone will need to explain this silliness about 'legal' and
>>>>>>>> 'illegal' immigrants.  The US Constitution provides no power 
>>>>>>>> whatsoever for
>>>>>>>> the Feds to extend or withhold permission for entry (or exit) into any 
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> the Sovereign States.  Besides, 'migration' is a natural right.
>>>>>>>>  Additionally, rights are inherent in Man's being -- not
>>>>>>>> permissions as you imply.
>>>>>>>> Not certain WHAT the Bible may have to do with anything.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As an aside, do you have any problem/difficulty with the THEFT and
>>>>>>>> SLAVERY promoted by both the Ds and Rs?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regard$,
>>>>>>>> --MJ
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Under the law of nature, all men are born free, every one comes
>>>>>>>> into the world with a right to his own person, which includes the 
>>>>>>>> liberty
>>>>>>>> of moving and using it at his own will.  This is what is called 
>>>>>>>> personal
>>>>>>>> liberty, and is given him by the Author of nature, because necessary 
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> his own sustenance." --Thomas Jefferson
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> At 11:42 AM 10/29/2010, you wrote: What rights do immigrants have
>>>>>>>> unless they are legal?  In reference to the Bible have you read the 
>>>>>>>> verses
>>>>>>>> on homosexuality?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  ----- Original Message ----- From: "MJ" <[email protected]> To:
>>>>>>>> [email protected] Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010
>>>>>>>> 11:24:30 AM Subject: Re: Tea party antics could end up burning
>>>>>>>> Republicans
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can you POINT me to a 'platform' or similar that suggests such? Thanks
>>>>>>>> in advance.
>>>>>>>> Regard$, --MJ
>>>>>>>> "Any man can make mistakes, but only an idiot persists in his
>>>>>>>> error. " -- Marcus Tullius Cicero
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> At 09:18 AM 10/29/2010, you wrote: >But it seems obvious that the
>>>>>>>> biggest reason to vote Democrat is to >take one good look at the
>>>>>>>> crazies in the Grand Opressive Tea Party and >what they will do to
>>>>>>>> oppresss LGBT people, as well as a whole slew of >demographic
>>>>>>>> minority groups, including immigrants, Latinos, >African-Americans
>>>>>>>> and women who have been raped or victims of incest. >If you don't
>>>>>>>> vote for the Democrats, you are opening the door for >bigoted
>>>>>>>> hateful theocrats like the Fred Phelps Wesboro "Church" who >totally
>>>>>>>> ignore Jesus' actual message of love, acceptance and inclusion >and
>>>>>>>> fail to know what their Bible really says. >The Republican Agenda
>>>>>>>> is anti-American. Their number one priority is >to obstruct and
>>>>>>>> make The President of The United States fail. Welcome >to the
>>>>>>>> Recorporate Party of Greed. >
>>>>>>>> -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For
>>>>>>>> options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>>>>>>> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>  * It's active and moderated.
>>>>>>>> Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news,
>>>>>>>> and more.
>>>>>>>> -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For
>>>>>>>> options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum   *
>>>>>>>> Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>>>>>>> <http://www.politicalforum.com/> * It's active and moderated.
>>>>>>>> Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news,
>>>>>>>> and more.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/
>>>>>>>> group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>>>>>>> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/
>>>>>>>> group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>>>>>>> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/
>>>>>>>> group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>>>>>>> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/
>>>>>>>> group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>>>>>>> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  --
>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/
>>>>>>>> group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>>>>>>> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>>>>>> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>>>  Your personal email. Anytime, anywhere.
>>>>>>> Ridiculously affordable at $19.95. No contracts.
>>>>>>> http://www.getpeek.com/lavabit.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> *Your remedy is in the courts - learn civil litigation with
>>>>>>> Jurisdictionary® <http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=CG0004>*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *I Refuse To Comply With The Unconstitutional Demands Of The Federal
>>>>>>> Government*
>>>>>>> http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Government is a disease masquerading as its own cure. Government is
>>>>>>> only as strong as those who allow themselves to be governed are weak. 
>>>>>>> "The
>>>>>>> 'art' of politics is diverting attention from what's really happening. 
>>>>>>> What
>>>>>>> separates politicians from other criminal organizations is superior 
>>>>>>> public
>>>>>>> relations."- Marc Stevens "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free 
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>> expects something that cannot be."- Thomas Jefferson*
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>  Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>>>>>> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>>>>> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>> Your personal email. Anytime, anywhere.
>>>>>> Ridiculously affordable at $19.95. No contracts.
>>>>>> http://www.getpeek.com/lavabit.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> *Your remedy is in the courts - learn civil litigation with
>>>>>> Jurisdictionary® <http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=CG0004>*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *I Refuse To Comply With The Unconstitutional Demands Of The Federal
>>>>>> Government*
>>>>>> http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Government is a disease masquerading as its own cure. Government is
>>>>>> only as strong as those who allow themselves to be governed are weak. 
>>>>>> "The
>>>>>> 'art' of politics is diverting attention from what's really happening. 
>>>>>> What
>>>>>> separates politicians from other criminal organizations is superior 
>>>>>> public
>>>>>> relations."- Marc Stevens "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free it
>>>>>> expects something that cannot be."- Thomas Jefferson*
>>>>>>  --
>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>>>>> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>
>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>>>> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>> Your personal email. Anytime, anywhere.
>>>>> Ridiculously affordable at $19.95. No contracts.
>>>>> http://www.getpeek.com/lavabit.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> *Your remedy is in the courts - learn civil litigation with
>>>>> Jurisdictionary® <http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=CG0004>*
>>>>>
>>>>> *I Refuse To Comply With The Unconstitutional Demands Of The Federal
>>>>> Government*
>>>>> http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Government is a disease masquerading as its own cure. Government is
>>>>> only as strong as those who allow themselves to be governed are weak. "The
>>>>> 'art' of politics is diverting attention from what's really happening. 
>>>>> What
>>>>> separates politicians from other criminal organizations is superior public
>>>>> relations."- Marc Stevens "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free it
>>>>> expects something that cannot be."- Thomas Jefferson*
>>>>>  --
>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>
>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>>>> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>
>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>>> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>> Your personal email. Anytime, anywhere.
>>>> Ridiculously affordable at $19.95. No contracts.
>>>> http://www.getpeek.com/lavabit.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *Your remedy is in the courts - learn civil litigation with
>>>> Jurisdictionary® <http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=CG0004>*
>>>>
>>>> *I Refuse To Comply With The Unconstitutional Demands Of The Federal
>>>> Government*
>>>> http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Government is a disease masquerading as its own cure. Government is
>>>> only as strong as those who allow themselves to be governed are weak. "The
>>>> 'art' of politics is diverting attention from what's really happening. What
>>>> separates politicians from other criminal organizations is superior public
>>>> relations."- Marc Stevens "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free it
>>>> expects something that cannot be."- Thomas Jefferson*
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>
>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>>> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>
>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mark M. Kahle H.
>>
>>  --
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to