don't shoot the messenger, zionist warmonger.

On Tuesday, October 14, 2014 11:38:03 AM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>
> Plain Ol';  citing the Daily Kos......Nothing new here......
>
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 12:06 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> Key neocons call for ending U.S. aid to Israel 
>> <http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/07/28/1317362/-Key-neocons-call-for-ending-U-S-aid-to-Israel>
>>  
>>
>> by Jon Perr <http://www.dailykos.com/user/Jon%20Perr>Follow 
>> <http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/07/28/1317362/-Key-neocons-call-for-ending-U-S-aid-to-Israel#?friend_id=8251&is_stream=1>
>>  
>>  attribution: CBN News
>> In their controversial 2007 book *The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign 
>> Policy 
>> <http://books.google.com/books?id=bQHXJ4JzxV4C&pg=PT41&lpg=PT41&dq=walt+mearsheimer+%22it+is+time+to+treat+israel+like+a+normal+country%22&source=bl&ots=AP9lfoauqx&sig=U3aKWiDtTRgyobaZyRdkgRn9hYg&hl=en&sa=X&ei=VZDWU8DsFevXigKL4oHAAQ&sqi=2&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=walt%20mearsheimer%20%22it%20is%20time%20to%20treat%20israel%20like%20a%20normal%20country%22&f=false>*,
>>  
>> authors John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt proposed a dramatic change in 
>> American financial aid for Israel currently amounting to $3 billion 
>> annually. "It is time to treat Israel like a normal country," they argued, 
>> "and make U.S. aid conditional on an end to the occupation and Israel's 
>> willingness to conform its policies to American interests." For this (among 
>> other perceived sins), the two men were vilified by many American 
>> politicians, press and pundits, and were quickly labelled anti-Semites--and 
>> worse. 
>>
>> But now, some of the same voices that led the charge against Mearsheimer 
>> and Walt are now calling for ending U.S. aid to Israel altogether 
>> <http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/07/18/some-of-israel-s-top-defenders-say-it-s-time-to-end-u-s-aid.html>.
>>  
>> At the front of that pack is Elliot Abrams. But the Iran-Contra 
>> conspirator, Iraq war architect and cheerleader for a preventive U.S. war 
>> to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities doesn't want to terminate financial 
>> support in order to enhance American leverage on Israel, but instead to 
>> *dramatically 
>> limit Washington's influence* over the Jewish State.
>>
>> As Eli Lake 
>> <http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/07/18/some-of-israel-s-top-defenders-say-it-s-time-to-end-u-s-aid.html>
>>  
>> explained in The Daily Beast, right now President Obama, overwhelming 
>> bipartisan majorities in Congress and the American Israeli Political Action 
>> Committee remain committed to sending billions in U.S. aid for years to 
>> come. But some of the usual suspects among the neoconservative movement 
>> have a different take:
>>
>> "The experience of the Obama years has sharpened the perception among 
>> pro-Israel Americans that aid can cut against Israel by giving presidents 
>> with bad ideas more leverage than they would otherwise have," said Noah 
>> Pollak, the executive director of the Emergency Committee for Israel 
>> (ECI)... aid provides easy fodder for critics to claim that the alliance is 
>> a burden on the United States or that it's a one-way street of America 
>> giving and Israel receiving. All things being equal, why not remove these 
>> falsehoods from the debate?"
>>
>> Abrams, who has called on Congress for an authorization for the use of 
>> military force (AUMF) to give President Obama a free hand to bomb Iran, 
>> wants to give Benjamin Netanyahu and his successors a free hand, period.
>>
>> "My view is over time it would be healthy for the relationship if the aid 
>> diminished. Israel should be less dependent on American financial 
>> assistance and should become the kind of ally that we have in Australia, 
>> Canada, or the United Kingdom: an intimate military relationship and 
>> alliance, but no military aid."
>>
>> (It should be noted, as former Ambassador to Washington Michael Oren did, 
>> that the United States does not have a mutual defense agreement with 
>> Israel. Then again, unlike Australia, Canada or the United Kingdom, 
>> Israel's power is not fungible on behalf of the United States. As the 
>> experience of the First Gulf War 
>> <http://www.nytimes.com/1991/01/20/world/war-gulf-president-bush-urges-israeli-restraint-phone-appeals-shamir.html>
>>  
>> showed to the chagrin of Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir, justifiable Israeli 
>> retaliation against Iraqi Scud missile strikes would have shattered the 
>> allied coalition that ejected Saddam Hussein from Kuwait.) 
>>
>> *Continue reading below.*
>>  
>>  With the Israeli economy booming and soon to be bolstered by massive 
>> proceeds from new natural gas discoveries, the once vital American billions 
>> will seem increasingly incongruous. As Abrams put it, "I do not believe a 
>> country that has a sovereign wealth fund can be an aid recipient."
>>
>> It's no surprise that David Wurmser would agree. Wurmser, an aide to Dick 
>> Cheney who resigned in 2007 over the Bush's administration's 
>> catastrophic policy 
>> <http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/07/20/1315353/-Hamas-rule-in-Gaza-President-Bush-built-that>
>>  
>> that enabled Hamas to take over Gaza, as far back as 1996 called Israel to 
>> graduate from being a "tenuous project" to a "real country." Now a 
>> consultant for U.S. firms looking to invest in the Israeli energy sector, 
>> Wurmser argues that the U.S. should cut the cord precisely so Israel can 
>> operate with impunity free of pressure from Washington:
>>
>> "The aid both implied a lack of feasibility of the state as well as tying 
>> the state's hands and reducing its freedom to maneuver. Both of which are 
>> inappropriate for a truly independent country, which it had become in this 
>> period."
>>
>> That's putting it mildly. As the withering criticism of Secretary of 
>> State John Kerry 
>> <http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/us-fuming-israeli-criticism-john-kerry> 
>> from the Israeli government and press shows, our ally like any other will 
>> ultimately do what it believes are necessary for its--and not 
>> American--interests. (That 87 percent of Israelis don't want a truce 
>> <http://www.jpost.com/Operation-Protective-Edge/Poll-865-percent-of-Israelis-oppose-cease-fire-369064>
>>  
>> to prevent the suddenly very popular Benjamin Netanyahu to crush Hamas in 
>> Gaza is reflects the two nation's diverging national interests.)   While 
>> not all of their fellow travelers agree, the message from the 
>> neoconservatives seems to be this. Israel will--and should--do whatever it 
>> wants to anyway; Americans might as well as save that $3 billion a year. 
>> Apparently, it's better for Stephen Walt, John Mearsheimer and millions of 
>> American taxpayers to be frustrated for free. 
>>  
>> -- 
>> -- 
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>  
>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "PoliticalForum" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to