the world is just supposed to sit back, and accept acts of violence and aggression against Western Culture and Societies? --- no more than we're supposed to accept israel's genocidal aggression toward goyim in israel.
so, since you have sided with the zionists, when are you self-deporting to israel? On Sunday, January 25, 2015 at 6:51:56 PM UTC-6, KeithInTampa wrote: > > *Writing on the wall? * > > Without wishing to appear callous, the carnage in Paris could hardly be > considered unexpected. In many ways the writing has been on the wall for > several years. > > After all, it comes in the wake of a string of incidents of murderous > Islamic-motivated violence across the country. > > In mid-March 2012, several off-duty soldiers were gunned down in Montauban > and Toulouse by a French-born Muslim of Algerian origin. > > A few days later, he slaughtered a rabbi and three children, aged three to > eight, in an attack on a Jewish day school in Toulouse. > > What totally goofy shit....So? Under this "theory"; the world is just > supposed to sit back, and accept acts of violence and aggression against > Western Culture and Societies? > > Typical far left extremist Moonbat! > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 7:06 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0tGbiFbF6w >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ntHNQIkQSw >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ibKWVTFSak >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VrmWgkeIVE >> >> On Sunday, January 25, 2015 at 9:50:49 AM UTC-6, Travis wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> http://jerusalemchannel.tv/islam-terror-rainfall-flooding/ >>> >>> >>> Islam is to Terror as Rainfall is to Flooding >>> >>> admin <http://jerusalemchannel.tv/author/admin/> / January 23, 2015 >>> >>> >>> >>> [image: Internet screenshot of Islamic State (ISIS) terror tactics on >>> the move] <http://jerusalemchannel.tv/islam-terror-rainfall-flooding/> >>> >>> *Internet screenshot of Islamic State (ISIS) terror tactics on the move* >>> >>> *Into the Fray >>> <http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Into-the-fray-Its-Islam-stupid-387171>: It’s >>> Islam, stupid!* >>> >>> *By Martin Sherman (reprinted with the author’s permission)* >>> >>> *One out six people all over the world is a Muslim… trying to say >>> anything in general about this huge community – 1.5 billion people – will >>> be wrong… The vast majority of these populations are not involved with all >>> what’s happening with violence and terror all over the world…. I don’t >>> think there is anything essential that connects between this huge and >>> historically important religion and all the terrorism that’s going on.* >>> – Sami Abu Shehadeh, secretary-general of Balad, Tel Aviv-Jaffa >>> >>> With these words, Sami Abu Shehadeh, of the anti-Zionist Arab party >>> Balad, commenced a debate with me on “The rise of anti-Muslim sentiment in >>> the West,” which took place in the i24 News studios last month. >>> >>> Clearly, recent events in Paris, in which 12 people were brutally gunned >>> down, gave the topic new and urgent relevance. >>> >>> *Islam is to terror as rainfall is to flooding * >>> >>> Of course, there is much truth in Abu Shehadeh’s claim that most Muslims >>> are not actively involved in terrorism. While this claim is factually >>> correct, substantively it is meaningless. >>> >>> For anyone with an iota of intellectual integrity and reasonably >>> informed of world affairs, the answer to whether Islam and violence and >>> terrorism are causally connected should be unequivocally clear. To ask >>> whether Islam is associated with terrorism is a little like asking if >>> rainfall is associated with flooding. Of course it is – as can be >>> irrefutably deduced from Abu Shehadeh’s attempt to exonerate it. >>> >>> After all, if one in six people in the world is a Muslim, it would mean >>> that five out of six are not. Right? So if there were no inordinate >>> affinity of Islam for violence/ terrorism, Muslim acts of terrorism should >>> be one-fifth of those of non-Muslim terrorism – i.e. if Islam had no >>> greater propensity for terrorism, one would have to expect non-Muslim acts >>> of terrorism to be five times (!) those perpetrated by Muslims. >>> >>> This is clearly not the case, and terrorist attacks committed by >>> adherents of Islam far outweigh those carried out by non-Muslims. >>> >>> It would therefore seem that – in stark violation of the protocols of >>> political correctness – there is little choice but to conclude what many in >>> the West sense instinctively: There is a disproportionate causal connection >>> between Islam on the one hand, and acts of ideo-politically motivated >>> violence against civilian populations, i.e. terrorism on the other. >>> >>> *Writing on the wall? * >>> >>> Without wishing to appear callous, the carnage in Paris could hardly be >>> considered unexpected. In many ways the writing has been on the wall for >>> several years. >>> >>> After all, it comes in the wake of a string of incidents of murderous >>> Islamic-motivated violence across the country. >>> >>> In mid-March 2012, several off-duty soldiers were gunned down in >>> Montauban and Toulouse by a French-born Muslim of Algerian origin. >>> >>> A few days later, he slaughtered a rabbi and three children, aged three >>> to eight, in an attack on a Jewish day school in Toulouse. >>> >>> More recently, just before Christmas, France was racked by a spate of >>> “lone wolf” terrorist attacks, in Dijon, Nantes and Tours, which prompted >>> the British Independent to report the incidents under the ominous headline >>> “France gripped by fear at Christmas after third street attack in three >>> days.” (December 23, 2014) In both the Dijon and Tours incidents, the >>> attacker is reported to have shouted “Allahu akbar,” dispelling any >>> suspicion that the assaults were perpetrated by Buddhist extremists. >>> >>> Muslim violence has been simmering in France for years, boiling over >>> regularly around Christmas and New Year, when hundreds of cars are torched >>> in Muslim-majority neighborhoods to usher in the start of the Gregorian >>> year. >>> >>> Typically, reports in the mainstream media studiously avoid mention of >>> any connection between this criminal arson on a massive scale and the >>> culprits’ ethnic origins. >>> >>> *Catalogue of carnage * >>> >>> The slaughter in Paris takes its place in a long list of acts of >>> butchery, all committed in the name of Islam. >>> >>> Consider the following (and decidedly partial) catalogue of carnage, of >>> the gory events that took place across the globe over the past two decades >>> and shocked the world with their brutally. >>> >>> New York – Cataclysmic destruction of the Twin Towers Washington – >>> Attempt to demolish the Pentagon London – Coordinated attack on the public >>> transport system; the beheading of an off duty soldier in broad daylight in >>> full public view Madrid – Bombing of crowded commuter trains at rush hour >>> Nairobi – Seizure of Westgate shopping mall and murder of scores of >>> innocents Burgas, Bulgaria – Bombing of a tourist bus Mumbai – Murderous >>> attack on the Taj Mahal Hotel, Chabad House and other sites Boston – >>> Bombing of the city’s annual marathon Bali – Bombing of crowded tourist >>> locations Buenos Aires – Deadly attacks on Jewish institutions and the >>> Israeli Embassy Ottawa – Assault on the Canadian Parliament Sydney – Recent >>> seizure of a downtown café and murder of two customers In-Amenas, Algeria – >>> Seizure of a gas facility and murder of dozens of civilians Chibock, >>> Nigeria – Abduction of almost 300 schoolgirls, reportedly to serve as sex >>> slaves This bloodcurdling list is in no way complete, and numerous other >>> incidents could be added. It certainly does not include all the attempted >>> attacks that were foiled by security services in various countries, >>> preventing the commission of even more gruesome atrocities by adherents of >>> Islam. >>> >>> *Horrors of intra-Muslim strife * >>> >>> Try as one may, there is no way that, in the modern world, any other >>> faith/creed can be associated with such violence/ terror – in scope, size, >>> frequency or ubiquity of occurrence. >>> >>> But as appalling as Muslim violence against non-Muslims might be, it >>> pales into insignificance when compared to violence between Muslims >>> themselves. >>> >>> It would be impossible to give a comprehensive survey of the >>> intra-Muslim carnage that has raged – and still rages – across vast swathes >>> of the globe, from the shores of the Atlantic Ocean to the islands of >>> Asia-Pacific. A brutally condensed synopsis will have to suffice. >>> >>> Even before the unspeakable barbarism of al-Nusra and Islamic State >>> began to sweep across much of the Levant, merciless massacres of Muslims at >>> the hands of Muslims abounded. >>> >>> For example, in the almost 10-year Algerian civil war, internecine >>> frictions between rival Islamist factions resulted in massive fratricide – >>> with a death toll reaching, by some estimates, 150,000. Acts of >>> unimaginable brutality were perpetrated with entire villages wiped out and >>> victims’ bodies mutilated. >>> >>> Likewise, regular bombings of markets and mosques across countries such >>> as Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan have produced massive loss of Muslim life >>> at the hands of belligerent brethren – yet hardly generate a footnote in >>> the mainstream media. The intra-Muslim conflict seems so intense and >>> complicated that even a reasonably informed layman would find it almost >>> impossible to figure out who is killing whom, and why… >>> >>> As a gauge of the scope of the slaughter, the Pakistani site Dawn >>> reported in a post titled “Islam at war – with itself” that al-Qaida >>> affiliates and other extreme Islamist groups “have perpetrated >>> indiscriminate violence against civilians…resulting in over 48,000 deaths…” >>> >>> *The majority of Muslims…* >>> >>> The pervasive violence in the Muslim world inevitably raises the >>> question of the general character of Islam and the kind of behavioral >>> patterns it seems to generate. >>> >>> It also raises the thorny question of minority actions vs majority >>> inaction. >>> >>> Thus, while Abu Shehadeh is probably right when he claims that only a >>> minority of Muslims are engaged in abhorrent acts of terrorism, it is >>> highly unlikely they would be able to sustain this activity without the >>> support – or at least the tacit approval – of much larger segments of the >>> population. >>> >>> Even if the majority does not actively endorse the conduct of a >>> delinquent minority, there is little evidence of effective disapproval, let >>> alone active opposition to it. (In this regard one can only hope that the >>> extraordinarily courageous speech by Egypt’s president Abdel Fattah >>> al-Sisi, calling for a “religious revolution,” will prove to be a harbinger >>> of some radical change in the course Islam is currently set upon.) So, >>> although, as Abu Shehadeh contends, it is difficult to formulate accurate >>> generalizations for 1.6 billion people, several edifying measures are >>> available that paint a daunting picture of the views held by much of the >>> Muslim world. >>> >>> The reputable Pew Research Center has conducted numerous in-depth >>> surveys across much of the Muslim world. Its findings show solid – at >>> times, overwhelming – majorities in many countries (and significant >>> minorities in others) in favor of harsh corporal punishments >>> (whipping/amputation) for theft/robbery; death by stoning for adultery; and >>> death for apostasy. >>> >>> With such a propensity for violence as a widely accepted cultural norm, >>> it is not implausible to assume that wide sections of the Muslim population >>> would not find the use of violence and terrorism totally incompatible with >>> their core beliefs. >>> >>> *Attempts at apologetics: The ‘colonialism’ canard * >>> >>> Numerous attempts have been made to explain away much of the prevalence >>> of violence in the Muslim world and conflict with the West. >>> >>> Arguably the most prominent among such apologists was none other than >>> President Barack Obama. In his 2009 “outreach address” in Cairo, he offered >>> the following explanation for the sad state of affairs between the West and >>> Islam which, he alleged, followed “centuries of coexistence and >>> cooperation.” (Really?) Obama suggested that “more recently, tension has >>> been fed by colonialism that denied rights and opportunities to many >>> Muslims.” >>> >>> This of course holds no water. >>> >>> For while it is true that much of the Middle East was under imperial >>> rule for centuries, this was mostly Muslim imperialism – i.e. the Ottoman >>> Empire. >>> >>> After all, with perhaps the exception of North Africa, Western >>> colonialism was imposed for a relatively short period after World War I, >>> and ended soon after World War II. This hardly seems sufficient to engender >>> the obdurate Islamic enmity we see today. >>> >>> So if complaints are to be lodged regarding colonialist deprivation of >>> Muslim rights and opportunities, shouldn’t they be directed at the Muslim >>> imperialists? Strangely, the the crucibles of today’s most extreme >>> anti-Western Islam were barely touched by colonialism – the Arabian >>> Peninsula and Iran. >>> >>> Although neither has endured any imperial – including Western – rule of >>> any consequence, the former birthed the Sunni-derivative version of Islamic >>> radicalism and the latter the Shia-derivative. This fact sits uneasily with >>> the diagnosis ascribing ongoing tensions between Muslims and the West to >>> colonialism. >>> >>> *No call to ‘Kill for Krishna’? * >>> >>> Moreover, one might well ask why the iniquities of colonialism have not >>> afflicted, say, the Hindu-majority in India, whose people were certainly >>> “denied rights and opportunities” under the yoke of British imperialism in >>> the same way as the Muslims of Pakistan. >>> >>> Yet, somehow we hear no cries of “Kill for Krishna” or “Ganesh is Great” >>> from embittered Hindu terrorists, blowing themselves up in crowded buses, >>> markets, cafes and mosques, as we do across the Muslim world – including in >>> neighboring Pakistan. >>> >>> Nor do we see aggrieved followers of Shiva embarking on a global holy >>> war to subjugate all to the Hindu creed. >>> >>> Why has India been able to put its colonial past behind it, and become a >>> vibrant economic juggernaut? Why has it not allowed itself to remain >>> tethered to the past and mired in homicidal frustration? Since by far most >>> victims of Muslim violence are other Muslims, rights and opportunities >>> allegedly denied by foreign occupiers seven decades ago seem a poor >>> explanation for current conduct. >>> >>> *Modernity as culprit? * >>> >>> Some have tried to contend that the onset of modernity and globalization >>> has created a sense of threat to Islamic values, which has precipitated the >>> tensions with the West. >>> >>> Thus, in Cairo, Obama suggested that “the sweeping change brought by >>> modernity and globalization led many Muslims to view the West as hostile to >>> Islamic traditions.” >>> >>> This too is difficult to accept. >>> >>> After all, Islam is the youngest of all major religions, founded >>> centuries – even in some cases, millennia – after Hinduism, Buddhism, >>> Judaism and Christianity. Why would the newest religion find that the >>> developments of modernity threaten its traditions in a manner that, >>> apparently, does not threaten the traditions of faiths far more ancient? >>> Why do they not generate the same tensions with the West that we find in >>> the case of the Muslim faith? Could it perhaps be that Islam is >>> fundamentally incompatible not only with modernity but with anything that >>> is not Islam, and that many cannot – or worse, refuse to – recognize this? >>> >>> *A clarion call * >>> >>> Europe in general and France in particular are on the cusp of a grim, >>> probably gruesome, future. >>> >>> European leaders would do well to heed the clarion call from someone who >>> has intimate knowledge of Islam – the Somalian-born former Dutch MP Ayaan >>> Hirsi Ali, who was forced flee to the US because of threats from Muslims >>> who objected to her criticism of Islam. She warned: “Islam is not a >>> religion of peace. It’s a political theory of conquest that seeks >>> domination by any means it can. Every accommodation of Muslim demands leads >>> to a sense of euphoria and a conviction that Allah is on their side. They >>> see every act of appeasement as an invitation to make fresh demands.” >>> (March 21, 2009) >>> >>> Europe had best heed this dire caveat and tailor its policies >>> accordingly, for if not, the consequences will be dire. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> __._,_.___ >>> ------------------------------ >>> Posted by: "beowulf" <[email protected]> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> Visit Your Group >>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmN2RyaTU3BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MjIxOTUwNTc-> >>> >>> >>> >>> [image: Yahoo! Groups] >>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlNG5vcDJjBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQyMjE5NTA1Nw--> >>> >>> • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> >>> • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use >>> <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> >>> >>> __,_._,___ >>> >>> >>> -- >> -- >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "PoliticalForum" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
