On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:24 PM, WarpTen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > When I talk about the wealthy that run the government I'm talking > about people who have billions, not Joe the plumber. Further, I don't > like being referred to as a lib tagged with warfare pimp and you > probably don't have any idea what it is.
You're a card-carrying class warfare pimp -you think the rich are evil, poor people are good, and that the government has a right to redistribute wealth from those who earned it to those who didn't as a means of equalizing the classes and making things more "fair." Classic class-warfare bullshit - Obama believes it too, so it's no surprise you support him. > That is asinine on your part > and lacks the maturity level required for further discourse. If you > have not yet reached that income level its probably because you are > impotent. Ummm...last I checked, I wasn't a male prostitute so my potency has no bearing on my income - but thanks for asking. >I personally have and with the better half have had a > combined income nearly twice that amount, which is an achievement for > two people born out of poverty. We own 3 homes in 3 states, have > property in NY and live the good life but that does not preclude our > ability to see the government for what it is, or what it has become, > not to mention that their bullshit antics have cost us thousands of > dollars. The money that Obama is going to cost me is peanuts and will > never affect my lifestyle and won't come near the money we've lost in > the last 8 years with Bush who cost me 12 employees. If you feel this strongly that you don't deserve the money you earn, then DONATE it. The rest of us would like to keep what we earn, and not have it STOLEN from us by Obama, nor do we want a welfare check - we'd prefer to work for our own money. > We are pragmatic > individuals with a keen sense of global economies, in fact when the > housing market goes up we are selling out all we have and moving to > Europe to get away from this sinking quagmire of political corruption. > Your assumptions are running rampant which is indicative of your > impudence. My comments were generalized and does not warrant a > personal attack, You brought up "morons without a clue," remember? And now you want to complain about personal attacks? Glass houses, my friend. > I still stand firm > and contend that it is time for the government to get back to its role > as a government for the people. The role of government never has been and should not be to steal wealth from those who earned it and give it to those who did not. If you feel THEFT is a legitimate role of government, perhaps you should move to Cuba. > I don't really give a damn about > corporations until they start manipulating our government for the sake > of corporate gain. You talk about hand outs? What about corporate > welfare? Liberal politicians LOVE corporate welfare - they'll vote for any pork-barrel spending and earmark bill that comes along, so long as they can funnel it back to companies in their home states. After Obama was elected to the US Senate, he sponsored a million-dollar earmark for Michelle's hospital. Shortly afterward, Michelle's salary TRIPLED. Coincidence? > On Oct 29, 6:47 pm, voxitar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
