This one is smart enough to know that to try to extrapolate 200+ year old intent is just mental masturbation.
On 11/3/08, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Nov 3, 3:39 pm, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > we are discussing constitutional law here... intent of the founding > fathers > > did NOT come with the packet. > > > Sure it does... > > There have een many Rulings by the SCOTUS that cite the intent of the > Founding Fathers. > > As well as Ruled on the intent of those writing certain Laws... > > One would think a Lawyer would know such a thing. > > > > -- Mark M. Kahle Blessed are the bewildered for they don't know the difference.... Me --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
