And this one, like several of the SCOTUS before me, is smart enough to know that these Men did not create that one Document in a vacuum, and that there are several Documents produced by the first Congress that clearly show their intent.
Again, your ignorance of History notwithstanding. And yes, for those unwilling to Learn their History it is in fact as you say. Not surprising to me that you would see it that way. On Nov 3, 6:49 pm, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This one is smart enough to know that to try to extrapolate 200+ year old > intent is just mental masturbation. > > On 11/3/08, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 3:39 pm, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > we are discussing constitutional law here... intent of the founding > > fathers > > > did NOT come with the packet. > > > Sure it does... > > > There have een many Rulings by the SCOTUS that cite the intent of the > > Founding Fathers. > > > As well as Ruled on the intent of those writing certain Laws... > > > One would think a Lawyer would know such a thing. > > -- > Mark M. Kahle > Blessed are the bewildered for they don't know the difference.... Me- Hide > quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
