is that the 1st congress before or the 1st congress after the coup?? On 11/3/08, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > And this one, like several of the SCOTUS before me, is smart enough to > know that these Men did not create that one Document in a vacuum, and > that there are several Documents produced by the first Congress that > clearly show their intent. > > Again, your ignorance of History notwithstanding. > > And yes, for those unwilling to Learn their History it is in fact as > you say. > > Not surprising to me that you would see it that way. > > > On Nov 3, 6:49 pm, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This one is smart enough to know that to try to extrapolate 200+ year old > > intent is just mental masturbation. > > > > On 11/3/08, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 3:39 pm, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > we are discussing constitutional law here... intent of the founding > > > fathers > > > > did NOT come with the packet. > > > > > Sure it does... > > > > > There have een many Rulings by the SCOTUS that cite the intent of the > > > Founding Fathers. > > > > > As well as Ruled on the intent of those writing certain Laws... > > > > > One would think a Lawyer would know such a thing. > > > > -- > > Mark M. Kahle > > Blessed are the bewildered for they don't know the difference.... Me- > Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > >
-- Mark M. Kahle Blessed are the bewildered for they don't know the difference.... Me --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
