To Get the Constitution Back, We'll Have To Rise To Rebellion
---
oh ... still wanting more unnecessary wars, reestablish slavery, corporate 
thievery, and human rights abuses, eh?

you'll probably be happier in israel or iran.

On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 at 2:12:06 PM UTC-6, Travis wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>
> [image: Description: Description: http://www.c4strategies.com/g1.jpg]
>
> [image: Description: Description: Subscribe] 
> <http://grasstopsusa.us1.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=aca8d391b7110c56628ee19de&id=2ac47cc5d5&e=c506d16e1c>*Wage
>  
> Web Warfare Against The Liberal Establishment *
>
>  
>
> [image: Description: Description: 
> http://www.grasstopsusa.com/donfeder.jpg]*To 
> Get the Constitution Back, We'll Have To Rise To Rebellion *
>
>
> *GrassTopsUSA Exclusive CommentaryBy Don FederJanuary 12, 2016* 
>
>        It's mid-January and the Iowa Caucuses are not quite three weeks 
> away. We're tired of discussing the issues—like where the candidates stand 
> on national suicide by open borders. Whatever shall we talk about? I know, 
> let's consider the weighty question of whether Sen. Ted Cruz is a 
> natural-born citizen! 
>
>        Donald Trump is skeptical. Lawrence Tribe, who teaches what's 
> alleged to be constitutional law at Harvard, says that whether Cruz is 
> qualified to serve as president under Article II, Section 1 of the 
> Constitution is hardly settled law — because the Supreme Court hasn't had 
> an opportunity to misinterpret it yet. 
>
>        Some conservatives think that being born to an American mother 
> (albeit in Canada) isn't enough to qualify. They believe "natural born" 
> means that not just you, but both of your parents were born in the United 
> States. While the left continues to use the Constitution as a battering ram 
> to demolish morality and representative government, we're reduced to such 
> silly arguments. 
>
>        For Republicans, the Constitution is a political prop. Every two 
> years, they take it out, dust it off, and pledge eternal devotion – then, 
> when activist judges use it to bend the people to their will, the elephants 
> in ladies undergarments do nothing to stop them, other than beating their 
> gums. For Democrats, the Constitution is a tool to transform society – to 
> impose on the nation by fiat what they could never get through the 
> political process. 
>
>        On January 6, Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore issued an 
> administrative order instructing probate judges not to give marriage 
> licenses to same-sex couples. Unlike those who worship or grovel at the 
> feet of *Obergefell*, Moore notes that such licenses violate an amendment 
> to the Alabama Constitution, adopted by 81% of the state's voters in a 2006 
> referendum, and SCOTUS can't change the order of the universe on a whim. 
>
>        Moore can't do that, sputters Rep. Patricia Todd, state director of 
> the Human Rights Campaign. Gay marriage is "settled law." When leftists say 
> something is settled law (or "the law of the land"), it means the courts 
> have given them exactly what they want, and now the process is over – 
> permanently and for all time. Dred Scott was settled law in 1857. *Plessy 
> v. Ferguson* was settled law in 1896. Thankfully, neither is now.
>
>        In its 1971 decision (*Baker v. Nelson*), by dismissing an appeal, 
> SCOTUS upheld a decision of the Minnesota Supreme Court that the state's 
> law restricting marriage to a man and a woman was constitutional. (Was 
> *Baker* settled law?) In *Obergefell v. Hodges*, decided last June, the 
> court's cultural Jacobins held that same-sex marriage was a right under the 
> 14th Amendment's equal protection clause. Other than the ideology that 
> guides the judiciary, what changed in the intervening years? Does judicial 
> mumbo-jumbo transform the intent of those who ratified it 135 years ago? 
>
>        Scalia said the majority opinion was "lacking even the veneer of 
> law" and constituted a "judicial Putsch." Chief Justice John Roberts said 
> the decision "has no basis in the Constitution... the majority's decision 
> is an act of will, not legal judgment." To support its edict, SCOTUS cited 
> what it called changing attitudes toward homosexual marriage (as if opinion 
> polls are a tool for interpreting the Constitution), and ignored 33 
> marriage amendments passed by statewide votes between 1998 and 2012, most 
> by super-majorities. 
>
>        Before *Obergefell*, Brian Brown, president of the National 
> Organization for Marriage, warned that it was "1973 for marriage," 
> referring to *Roe v. Wade*. 
>
>        In retirement, Associate Justice William Brennan, the architect of 
> *Roe*, admitted that the majority of the Burger Court first decided that 
> it wanted to create a right to abortion and then cast about for ways to 
> justify it under the Constitution. Building on *Griswold v. Connecticut*, 
> ( 1965), which found a right to privacy hidden in the bowels of the 14th 
> Amendment, SCOTUS decided that (like Russian nesting dolls), one 
> non-existent right (privacy) contained within it another non-existent right 
> (that of a woman to abort her child). 
>
>        From *Roe* came 57.76 million dead children by the ruling's 42nd 
> anniversary, partial-birth abortions, 14-year-olds getting abortions 
> without their parent's knowledge or consent, and Planned Parenthood's sale 
> of parts from aborted babies – among other horrors perpetrated in the name 
> of privacy. *Roe* laid the foundation for *Obergefell*, which one day 
> will be used to legalize doctor-assisted suicide and other milestones on 
> the road to a death-camp utopia. 
>
>        Justice Anthony Kennedy (the Supreme Court's Soupy Sales) is the 
> author of the *Obergefell* opinion. He's also the author of the 1992 
> decision in *Planned Parenthood v. Casey*, which reaffirmed *Roe*. In 
> what Justice Scalia has derisively called the "sweet mystery of life" 
> passage, Kennedy confided that, "At the heart of liberty is the right to 
> define one's own concept of existence, of meaning of the universe, and of 
> the mystery of human life." Thus the United States Constitution has 
> devolved from the best system of government yet devised to Zen meditation. 
>
>        Roberts, who chided the majority in *Obergefell*, himself has 
> played the Sorcerer's Apprentice elsewhere. He's saved Obamacare twice by 
> pulling rabbits out of judicial hats. The first time, in 2102 (*National 
> Federation of Independent Businesses v. Sebelius*), Roberts was so 
> desperate to find Obamacare constitutional that he decided its fines were 
> actually taxes, even though the administration rejected the argument in its 
> brief. 
>
>        While the Cruz and Moore dramas unfolded, President 
> I-am-the-Constitution, announced 10 new executive orders to curtail gun 
> ownership, including redefining a gun dealer as almost anyone who sells 
> even a single firearm annually. Obama could never get this through 
> Congress, so he decided to combine the legislative and executive branches, 
> with all power in his hands. Similarly, he's declared a number of blanket 
> amnesties last year. 
>
>        Who's to stop him? Not Republicans, who fear that standing up to 
> this despotism would hurt their prospects this year. And they wouldn't even 
> have to impeach him (though he deserves it more than any of his 
> predecessors), just stop confirming his appointments, including his 
> judicial appointments. 
>
>        This is what makes the debate over the meaning of natural-born 
> citizen so hilarious. The Constitution is dead. The left killed it over the 
> course of half a century, going back to the 1962 school-prayer decision. 
> And we’re running around in circles trying to decipher a phrase which will 
> probably never be defined, definitively. 
>
>        This is a game conservatives can't win. 
>
>        The left controls the law schools from which lawyers and future 
> judges issue. (It decides the curricula, like Critical Legal Studies.) It 
> controls the media which shapes the culture that molds activist judges, and 
> then misreports what the courts are doing. 
>
>        And it controls public education, which refuses to teach American 
> history, including the Constitution. A survey for Constitution Week in 1997 
> found that two-thirds of Americans couldn't name the three branches of 
> government, and 84% thought the phrase "all men are equal" is in the 
> Constitution. (It's "all men are *created* equal" and it's in the 
> Declaration of Independence.) 
>
>        The Constitution's framers understood that even their remarkable 
> creation was only as good as the people who would be called on to defend 
> it. As Benjamin Franklin replied on leaving the Constitutional Convention, 
> when asked what form of government America would have, "a Republic, if you 
> can keep it." 
>
>        We could get the Constitution back one day. Electing someone like 
> Ted Cruz would be a start. But even that is no assurance. We'll need to 
> raise up a generation — like the one that produced the Constitution — to 
> rise to rebellion and overthrow a judicial tyranny supported by the 
> political elite. 
>
> *Don Feder is a former Boston Herald writer who is now a 
> political/communications consultant. He also maintains a **Facebook page* 
> <http://grasstopsusa.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=aca8d391b7110c56628ee19de&id=02f5cf564d&e=c506d16e1c>
> *.*
>
> *The following story can be found on the GrassTopsUSA website at *
> *http://www.grasstopsusa.com/df011216.html* 
> <http://grasstopsusa.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=aca8d391b7110c56628ee19de&id=f35474d40b&e=c506d16e1c>*.
>   
> Permission to reprint or quote this commentary on the Internet is granted 
> provided you include a byline to Don Feder, attribution to GrassTopsUSA and 
> link back to the article at the URL above.*
>
>  
>
> .
>
>
>
>
>
> [image: Description: Description: 
> http://grasstopsusa.us1.list-manage.com/track/open.php?u=aca8d391b7110c56628ee19de&id=294b9a67f2&e=c506d16e1c]
>
>
> __._,_.___
> ------------------------------
> Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> ------------------------------
>
>
> Visit Your Group 
> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmdGNsYThyBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NTI2MjcyNzY->
>  
>    
>    - New Members 
>    
> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/members/all;_ylc=X3oDMTJnMGtmMDYxBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2bWJycwRzdGltZQMxNDUyNjI3Mjc2>
>  
>    1 
>
> [image: Yahoo! Groups] 
> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlMDU2dW5qBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ1MjYyNzI3Ng-->
>  
> • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> • 
> Unsubscribe <javascript:> • Terms of Use 
> <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> 
>
> __,_._,___
>
>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to