no ... I belong here ... your allegiance is with a foreign nation that extorts America. go home.
On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 at 2:32:07 PM UTC-6, KeithInTampa wrote: > > I would think, based on your hatred of Jews, Republicans, Christians, > mainstream Americans, and most anyone who supports either of the four, > (which is the majority of Americans) maybe you'd be happier in another > land? > > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 3:21 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> To Get the Constitution Back, We'll Have To Rise To Rebellion >> --- >> oh ... still wanting more unnecessary wars, reestablish slavery, >> corporate thievery, and human rights abuses, eh? >> >> you'll probably be happier in israel or iran. >> >> On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 at 2:12:06 PM UTC-6, Travis wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> [image: Description: Description: http://www.c4strategies.com/g1.jpg] >>> >>> [image: Description: Description: Subscribe] >>> <http://grasstopsusa.us1.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=aca8d391b7110c56628ee19de&id=2ac47cc5d5&e=c506d16e1c>*Wage >>> >>> Web Warfare Against The Liberal Establishment * >>> >>> >>> >>> [image: Description: Description: >>> http://www.grasstopsusa.com/donfeder.jpg]*To Get the Constitution Back, >>> We'll Have To Rise To Rebellion * >>> >>> >>> *GrassTopsUSA Exclusive CommentaryBy Don FederJanuary 12, 2016* >>> >>> It's mid-January and the Iowa Caucuses are not quite three weeks >>> away. We're tired of discussing the issues—like where the candidates stand >>> on national suicide by open borders. Whatever shall we talk about? I know, >>> let's consider the weighty question of whether Sen. Ted Cruz is a >>> natural-born citizen! >>> >>> Donald Trump is skeptical. Lawrence Tribe, who teaches what's >>> alleged to be constitutional law at Harvard, says that whether Cruz is >>> qualified to serve as president under Article II, Section 1 of the >>> Constitution is hardly settled law — because the Supreme Court hasn't had >>> an opportunity to misinterpret it yet. >>> >>> Some conservatives think that being born to an American mother >>> (albeit in Canada) isn't enough to qualify. They believe "natural born" >>> means that not just you, but both of your parents were born in the United >>> States. While the left continues to use the Constitution as a battering ram >>> to demolish morality and representative government, we're reduced to such >>> silly arguments. >>> >>> For Republicans, the Constitution is a political prop. Every two >>> years, they take it out, dust it off, and pledge eternal devotion – then, >>> when activist judges use it to bend the people to their will, the elephants >>> in ladies undergarments do nothing to stop them, other than beating their >>> gums. For Democrats, the Constitution is a tool to transform society – to >>> impose on the nation by fiat what they could never get through the >>> political process. >>> >>> On January 6, Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore issued an >>> administrative order instructing probate judges not to give marriage >>> licenses to same-sex couples. Unlike those who worship or grovel at the >>> feet of *Obergefell*, Moore notes that such licenses violate an >>> amendment to the Alabama Constitution, adopted by 81% of the state's voters >>> in a 2006 referendum, and SCOTUS can't change the order of the universe on >>> a whim. >>> >>> Moore can't do that, sputters Rep. Patricia Todd, state director >>> of the Human Rights Campaign. Gay marriage is "settled law." When leftists >>> say something is settled law (or "the law of the land"), it means the >>> courts have given them exactly what they want, and now the process is over >>> – permanently and for all time. Dred Scott was settled law in 1857. *Plessy >>> v. Ferguson* was settled law in 1896. Thankfully, neither is now. >>> >>> In its 1971 decision (*Baker v. Nelson*), by dismissing an >>> appeal, SCOTUS upheld a decision of the Minnesota Supreme Court that the >>> state's law restricting marriage to a man and a woman was constitutional. >>> (Was *Baker* settled law?) In *Obergefell v. Hodges*, decided last >>> June, the court's cultural Jacobins held that same-sex marriage was a right >>> under the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause. Other than the ideology >>> that guides the judiciary, what changed in the intervening years? Does >>> judicial mumbo-jumbo transform the intent of those who ratified it 135 >>> years ago? >>> >>> Scalia said the majority opinion was "lacking even the veneer of >>> law" and constituted a "judicial Putsch." Chief Justice John Roberts said >>> the decision "has no basis in the Constitution... the majority's decision >>> is an act of will, not legal judgment." To support its edict, SCOTUS cited >>> what it called changing attitudes toward homosexual marriage (as if opinion >>> polls are a tool for interpreting the Constitution), and ignored 33 >>> marriage amendments passed by statewide votes between 1998 and 2012, most >>> by super-majorities. >>> >>> Before *Obergefell*, Brian Brown, president of the National >>> Organization for Marriage, warned that it was "1973 for marriage," >>> referring to *Roe v. Wade*. >>> >>> In retirement, Associate Justice William Brennan, the architect >>> of *Roe*, admitted that the majority of the Burger Court first decided >>> that it wanted to create a right to abortion and then cast about for ways >>> to justify it under the Constitution. Building on *Griswold v. >>> Connecticut*, ( 1965), which found a right to privacy hidden in the >>> bowels of the 14th Amendment, SCOTUS decided that (like Russian nesting >>> dolls), one non-existent right (privacy) contained within it another >>> non-existent right (that of a woman to abort her child). >>> >>> From *Roe* came 57.76 million dead children by the ruling's 42nd >>> anniversary, partial-birth abortions, 14-year-olds getting abortions >>> without their parent's knowledge or consent, and Planned Parenthood's sale >>> of parts from aborted babies – among other horrors perpetrated in the name >>> of privacy. *Roe* laid the foundation for *Obergefell*, which one day >>> will be used to legalize doctor-assisted suicide and other milestones on >>> the road to a death-camp utopia. >>> >>> Justice Anthony Kennedy (the Supreme Court's Soupy Sales) is the >>> author of the *Obergefell* opinion. He's also the author of the 1992 >>> decision in *Planned Parenthood v. Casey*, which reaffirmed *Roe*. In >>> what Justice Scalia has derisively called the "sweet mystery of life" >>> passage, Kennedy confided that, "At the heart of liberty is the right to >>> define one's own concept of existence, of meaning of the universe, and of >>> the mystery of human life." Thus the United States Constitution has >>> devolved from the best system of government yet devised to Zen meditation. >>> >>> Roberts, who chided the majority in *Obergefell*, himself has >>> played the Sorcerer's Apprentice elsewhere. He's saved Obamacare twice by >>> pulling rabbits out of judicial hats. The first time, in 2102 (*National >>> Federation of Independent Businesses v. Sebelius*), Roberts was so >>> desperate to find Obamacare constitutional that he decided its fines were >>> actually taxes, even though the administration rejected the argument in its >>> brief. >>> >>> While the Cruz and Moore dramas unfolded, President >>> I-am-the-Constitution, announced 10 new executive orders to curtail gun >>> ownership, including redefining a gun dealer as almost anyone who sells >>> even a single firearm annually. Obama could never get this through >>> Congress, so he decided to combine the legislative and executive branches, >>> with all power in his hands. Similarly, he's declared a number of blanket >>> amnesties last year. >>> >>> Who's to stop him? Not Republicans, who fear that standing up to >>> this despotism would hurt their prospects this year. And they wouldn't even >>> have to impeach him (though he deserves it more than any of his >>> predecessors), just stop confirming his appointments, including his >>> judicial appointments. >>> >>> This is what makes the debate over the meaning of natural-born >>> citizen so hilarious. The Constitution is dead. The left killed it over the >>> course of half a century, going back to the 1962 school-prayer decision. >>> And we’re running around in circles trying to decipher a phrase which will >>> probably never be defined, definitively. >>> >>> This is a game conservatives can't win. >>> >>> The left controls the law schools from which lawyers and future >>> judges issue. (It decides the curricula, like Critical Legal Studies.) It >>> controls the media which shapes the culture that molds activist judges, and >>> then misreports what the courts are doing. >>> >>> And it controls public education, which refuses to teach American >>> history, including the Constitution. A survey for Constitution Week in 1997 >>> found that two-thirds of Americans couldn't name the three branches of >>> government, and 84% thought the phrase "all men are equal" is in the >>> Constitution. (It's "all men are *created* equal" and it's in the >>> Declaration of Independence.) >>> >>> The Constitution's framers understood that even their remarkable >>> creation was only as good as the people who would be called on to defend >>> it. As Benjamin Franklin replied on leaving the Constitutional Convention, >>> when asked what form of government America would have, "a Republic, if you >>> can keep it." >>> >>> We could get the Constitution back one day. Electing someone like >>> Ted Cruz would be a start. But even that is no assurance. We'll need to >>> raise up a generation — like the one that produced the Constitution — to >>> rise to rebellion and overthrow a judicial tyranny supported by the >>> political elite. >>> >>> *Don Feder is a former Boston Herald writer who is now a >>> political/communications consultant. He also maintains a **Facebook >>> page* >>> <http://grasstopsusa.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=aca8d391b7110c56628ee19de&id=02f5cf564d&e=c506d16e1c> >>> *.* >>> >>> *The following story can be found on the GrassTopsUSA website at * >>> *http://www.grasstopsusa.com/df011216.html* >>> <http://grasstopsusa.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=aca8d391b7110c56628ee19de&id=f35474d40b&e=c506d16e1c>*. >>> >>> Permission to reprint or quote this commentary on the Internet is granted >>> provided you include a byline to Don Feder, attribution to GrassTopsUSA and >>> link back to the article at the URL above.* >>> >>> >>> >>> . >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> [image: Description: Description: >>> http://grasstopsusa.us1.list-manage.com/track/open.php?u=aca8d391b7110c56628ee19de&id=294b9a67f2&e=c506d16e1c] >>> >>> >>> __._,_.___ >>> ------------------------------ >>> Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> Visit Your Group >>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmdGNsYThyBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NTI2MjcyNzY-> >>> >>> >>> - New Members >>> >>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/members/all;_ylc=X3oDMTJnMGtmMDYxBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2bWJycwRzdGltZQMxNDUyNjI3Mjc2> >>> >>> 1 >>> >>> [image: Yahoo! Groups] >>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlMDU2dW5qBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ1MjYyNzI3Ng--> >>> >>> • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> >>> • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use >>> <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> >>> >>> __,_._,___ >>> >>> >>> -- >> -- >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "PoliticalForum" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
![http://www.grasstopsusa.com/donfeder.jpg]*To](http://www.grasstopsusa.com/donfeder.jpg]*To){kind=link}