Not True Plain Ol!   If anyone is at odds with America, policy and issues,
it's you my friend!



On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 3:53 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected]>
wrote:

> no ... I belong here ... your allegiance is with a foreign nation that
> extorts America.
> go home.
>
> On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 at 2:32:07 PM UTC-6, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>
>> I would think, based on your hatred of Jews, Republicans, Christians,
>> mainstream Americans,  and most anyone who supports either of the four,
>> (which is the majority of Americans)  maybe you'd be happier in another
>> land?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 3:21 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> To Get the Constitution Back, We'll Have To Rise To Rebellion
>>> ---
>>> oh ... still wanting more unnecessary wars, reestablish slavery,
>>> corporate thievery, and human rights abuses, eh?
>>>
>>> you'll probably be happier in israel or iran.
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 at 2:12:06 PM UTC-6, Travis wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [image: Description: Description: http://www.c4strategies.com/g1.jpg]
>>>>
>>>> [image: Description: Description: Subscribe]
>>>> <http://grasstopsusa.us1.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=aca8d391b7110c56628ee19de&id=2ac47cc5d5&e=c506d16e1c>*Wage
>>>> Web Warfare Against The Liberal Establishment *
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [image: Description: Description:
>>>> http://www.grasstopsusa.com/donfeder.jpg]*To Get the Constitution
>>>> Back, We'll Have To Rise To Rebellion *
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *GrassTopsUSA Exclusive CommentaryBy Don FederJanuary 12, 2016*
>>>>
>>>>        It's mid-January and the Iowa Caucuses are not quite three weeks
>>>> away. We're tired of discussing the issues—like where the candidates stand
>>>> on national suicide by open borders. Whatever shall we talk about? I know,
>>>> let's consider the weighty question of whether Sen. Ted Cruz is a
>>>> natural-born citizen!
>>>>
>>>>        Donald Trump is skeptical. Lawrence Tribe, who teaches what's
>>>> alleged to be constitutional law at Harvard, says that whether Cruz is
>>>> qualified to serve as president under Article II, Section 1 of the
>>>> Constitution is hardly settled law — because the Supreme Court hasn't had
>>>> an opportunity to misinterpret it yet.
>>>>
>>>>        Some conservatives think that being born to an American mother
>>>> (albeit in Canada) isn't enough to qualify. They believe "natural born"
>>>> means that not just you, but both of your parents were born in the United
>>>> States. While the left continues to use the Constitution as a battering ram
>>>> to demolish morality and representative government, we're reduced to such
>>>> silly arguments.
>>>>
>>>>        For Republicans, the Constitution is a political prop. Every two
>>>> years, they take it out, dust it off, and pledge eternal devotion – then,
>>>> when activist judges use it to bend the people to their will, the elephants
>>>> in ladies undergarments do nothing to stop them, other than beating their
>>>> gums. For Democrats, the Constitution is a tool to transform society – to
>>>> impose on the nation by fiat what they could never get through the
>>>> political process.
>>>>
>>>>        On January 6, Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore issued an
>>>> administrative order instructing probate judges not to give marriage
>>>> licenses to same-sex couples. Unlike those who worship or grovel at the
>>>> feet of *Obergefell*, Moore notes that such licenses violate an
>>>> amendment to the Alabama Constitution, adopted by 81% of the state's voters
>>>> in a 2006 referendum, and SCOTUS can't change the order of the universe on
>>>> a whim.
>>>>
>>>>        Moore can't do that, sputters Rep. Patricia Todd, state director
>>>> of the Human Rights Campaign. Gay marriage is "settled law." When leftists
>>>> say something is settled law (or "the law of the land"), it means the
>>>> courts have given them exactly what they want, and now the process is over
>>>> – permanently and for all time. Dred Scott was settled law in 1857. *Plessy
>>>> v. Ferguson* was settled law in 1896. Thankfully, neither is now.
>>>>
>>>>        In its 1971 decision (*Baker v. Nelson*), by dismissing an
>>>> appeal, SCOTUS upheld a decision of the Minnesota Supreme Court that the
>>>> state's law restricting marriage to a man and a woman was constitutional.
>>>> (Was *Baker* settled law?) In *Obergefell v. Hodges*, decided last
>>>> June, the court's cultural Jacobins held that same-sex marriage was a right
>>>> under the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause. Other than the ideology
>>>> that guides the judiciary, what changed in the intervening years? Does
>>>> judicial mumbo-jumbo transform the intent of those who ratified it 135
>>>> years ago?
>>>>
>>>>        Scalia said the majority opinion was "lacking even the veneer of
>>>> law" and constituted a "judicial Putsch." Chief Justice John Roberts said
>>>> the decision "has no basis in the Constitution... the majority's decision
>>>> is an act of will, not legal judgment." To support its edict, SCOTUS cited
>>>> what it called changing attitudes toward homosexual marriage (as if opinion
>>>> polls are a tool for interpreting the Constitution), and ignored 33
>>>> marriage amendments passed by statewide votes between 1998 and 2012, most
>>>> by super-majorities.
>>>>
>>>>        Before *Obergefell*, Brian Brown, president of the National
>>>> Organization for Marriage, warned that it was "1973 for marriage,"
>>>> referring to *Roe v. Wade*.
>>>>
>>>>        In retirement, Associate Justice William Brennan, the architect
>>>> of *Roe*, admitted that the majority of the Burger Court first decided
>>>> that it wanted to create a right to abortion and then cast about for ways
>>>> to justify it under the Constitution. Building on *Griswold v.
>>>> Connecticut*, ( 1965), which found a right to privacy hidden in the
>>>> bowels of the 14th Amendment, SCOTUS decided that (like Russian nesting
>>>> dolls), one non-existent right (privacy) contained within it another
>>>> non-existent right (that of a woman to abort her child).
>>>>
>>>>        From *Roe* came 57.76 million dead children by the ruling's
>>>> 42nd anniversary, partial-birth abortions, 14-year-olds getting abortions
>>>> without their parent's knowledge or consent, and Planned Parenthood's sale
>>>> of parts from aborted babies – among other horrors perpetrated in the name
>>>> of privacy. *Roe* laid the foundation for *Obergefell*, which one day
>>>> will be used to legalize doctor-assisted suicide and other milestones on
>>>> the road to a death-camp utopia.
>>>>
>>>>        Justice Anthony Kennedy (the Supreme Court's Soupy Sales) is the
>>>> author of the *Obergefell* opinion. He's also the author of the 1992
>>>> decision in *Planned Parenthood v. Casey*, which reaffirmed *Roe*. In
>>>> what Justice Scalia has derisively called the "sweet mystery of life"
>>>> passage, Kennedy confided that, "At the heart of liberty is the right to
>>>> define one's own concept of existence, of meaning of the universe, and of
>>>> the mystery of human life." Thus the United States Constitution has
>>>> devolved from the best system of government yet devised to Zen meditation.
>>>>
>>>>        Roberts, who chided the majority in *Obergefell*, himself has
>>>> played the Sorcerer's Apprentice elsewhere. He's saved Obamacare twice by
>>>> pulling rabbits out of judicial hats. The first time, in 2102 (*National
>>>> Federation of Independent Businesses v. Sebelius*), Roberts was so
>>>> desperate to find Obamacare constitutional that he decided its fines were
>>>> actually taxes, even though the administration rejected the argument in its
>>>> brief.
>>>>
>>>>        While the Cruz and Moore dramas unfolded, President
>>>> I-am-the-Constitution, announced 10 new executive orders to curtail gun
>>>> ownership, including redefining a gun dealer as almost anyone who sells
>>>> even a single firearm annually. Obama could never get this through
>>>> Congress, so he decided to combine the legislative and executive branches,
>>>> with all power in his hands. Similarly, he's declared a number of blanket
>>>> amnesties last year.
>>>>
>>>>        Who's to stop him? Not Republicans, who fear that standing up to
>>>> this despotism would hurt their prospects this year. And they wouldn't even
>>>> have to impeach him (though he deserves it more than any of his
>>>> predecessors), just stop confirming his appointments, including his
>>>> judicial appointments.
>>>>
>>>>        This is what makes the debate over the meaning of natural-born
>>>> citizen so hilarious. The Constitution is dead. The left killed it over the
>>>> course of half a century, going back to the 1962 school-prayer decision.
>>>> And we’re running around in circles trying to decipher a phrase which will
>>>> probably never be defined, definitively.
>>>>
>>>>        This is a game conservatives can't win.
>>>>
>>>>        The left controls the law schools from which lawyers and future
>>>> judges issue. (It decides the curricula, like Critical Legal Studies.) It
>>>> controls the media which shapes the culture that molds activist judges, and
>>>> then misreports what the courts are doing.
>>>>
>>>>        And it controls public education, which refuses to teach
>>>> American history, including the Constitution. A survey for Constitution
>>>> Week in 1997 found that two-thirds of Americans couldn't name the three
>>>> branches of government, and 84% thought the phrase "all men are equal" is
>>>> in the Constitution. (It's "all men are *created* equal" and it's in
>>>> the Declaration of Independence.)
>>>>
>>>>        The Constitution's framers understood that even their remarkable
>>>> creation was only as good as the people who would be called on to defend
>>>> it. As Benjamin Franklin replied on leaving the Constitutional Convention,
>>>> when asked what form of government America would have, "a Republic, if you
>>>> can keep it."
>>>>
>>>>        We could get the Constitution back one day. Electing someone
>>>> like Ted Cruz would be a start. But even that is no assurance. We'll need
>>>> to raise up a generation — like the one that produced the Constitution — to
>>>> rise to rebellion and overthrow a judicial tyranny supported by the
>>>> political elite.
>>>>
>>>> *Don Feder is a former Boston Herald writer who is now a
>>>> political/communications consultant. He also maintains a **Facebook
>>>> page*
>>>> <http://grasstopsusa.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=aca8d391b7110c56628ee19de&id=02f5cf564d&e=c506d16e1c>
>>>> *.*
>>>>
>>>> *The following story can be found on the GrassTopsUSA website at *
>>>> *http://www.grasstopsusa.com/df011216.html*
>>>> <http://grasstopsusa.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=aca8d391b7110c56628ee19de&id=f35474d40b&e=c506d16e1c>*.
>>>> Permission to reprint or quote this commentary on the Internet is granted
>>>> provided you include a byline to Don Feder, attribution to GrassTopsUSA and
>>>> link back to the article at the URL above.*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [image: Description: Description:
>>>> http://grasstopsusa.us1.list-manage.com/track/open.php?u=aca8d391b7110c56628ee19de&id=294b9a67f2&e=c506d16e1c]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> __._,_.___
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Visit Your Group
>>>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmdGNsYThyBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NTI2MjcyNzY->
>>>>
>>>>    - New Members
>>>>    
>>>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/members/all;_ylc=X3oDMTJnMGtmMDYxBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2bWJycwRzdGltZQMxNDUyNjI3Mjc2>
>>>>    1
>>>>
>>>> [image: Yahoo! Groups]
>>>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlMDU2dW5qBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ1MjYyNzI3Ng-->
>>>> • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html>
>>>> • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use
>>>> <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>
>>>>
>>>> __,_._,___
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>> --
>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>
>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> --
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to