What kind of religion sanctions deception and immorality for the sake of political goals? Orthodox Talmudic Judaism. The Babylonian Talmud encourages Jews to cheat and deceive Gentiles whenever necessary! In fact, "by way of deception" is the motto of Israel's spy agency Mossad. Official license to deceive and even commit sexual immorality was seen in Israel this week. Eminent <http://www.themedialine.org/news/news_detail.asp?NewsID=30188>Orthodox Rabbi Ari Shvat responded to a female student's question about the morality of seducing and sleeping with an enemy. " I was asked a question by a student of mine who was a religious girl that had been recruited by the Mossad. She wanted to know if a woman was allowed to do this kind of work." Shvat ruled yes and published an essay in Tehumin, an annual collection of articles on law and modernity. The Jewish World summarizes: "A new Halachic study ruled that seducing an enemy for the sake of national security is an important mitzvah" It is, in fact, an "utmost mitzvah" (legal command). Shvat's work was published by the Tzomet Institute, a non-profit organization dedicated to "seamlessly merging Judaism with modern Israeli life." In the ruling, Shvat says women can be "used to seduce enemy agents in order to cajole information out of them or see them captured." Jewish World says such women were used to capture nuclear whistleblower Mordechai Vanunu and to assassinate a senior Hamas operative in Dubai last January. Such deception, says the rabbi, is "Halacha," or binding Talmudic law. Even with homicidal intent, he writes, "sexual intercourse with a Gentile for the sake of a national cause is not only sanctioned, but is a highly important mitzvahOur Sages of Blessed Memory elevate such acts of dedication to the top of the Halacha's mitzvahs pyramid." Rabbi Yisrael Rosen, head of Tzomet Institute and editor-in-chief of Tehumin, called the study "daring and importantAlthough it is highly unlikely that Mossad agents will seek rabbinical advice, this essay is very important and courageous. The author is versed in religious discourse and even conservative rabbis would surely agree with his thesis." Shvat's ruling, reported by a major Jewish news agency, is presented without criticism. It reveals a disturbing, even ominous fact: Talmudic Judaism encourages Jews to ensnare and deceive Gentiles in order to advance Jews and Jewish causes, as long as they can get away with it. If they are caught and Israel is embarrassed, the "holy name of God" (synonymous with Israel's good reputation) may be blasphemed. If that is a real possibility, the Talmud tells Jews to back off. But in order to save the Jewish nation it is even morally permitted to murder and commit adultery. God "Outlawed" the Gentiles The Talmudic position concerning deception of Gentiles is embodied in the Halachic dictum, "It is permitted to deceive a goy (Gentile)." [1] In legal and business matters, the Talmud says Gentiles are beneath equality with Jews. As the 1905 Jewish Encyclopedia explains [2], the Gentiles were "outlawed" by God from the beginning. The passage in Moses' farewell address: 'The Lord came form Sinai, and rose up from Seir unto them; he shined forth from Mount Paran'. . . indicates that the Almighty offered the Torah to the Gentile nations also, but, since they refused to accept it, He withdrew His 'shining' legal protection form them, and transferred their property rights to Israel, who observed His law. A passage in Habakkuk is quoted as confirming this claim: 'God came from Teman, and the Holy One from Mount Paran. . .He stood and measured the earth he beheld, and drove asunder ["outlawed"] the nations.' . . .the Talmud adds that He had observed how the Gentile nations steadfastly refused to obey the seven moral Noachian precepts, and hence He decided to outlaw them." (Baba Kama 38a). The rabbis believed Gentiles demonstrated their stupidity by thinking their own laws were worthy of obeying. The Talmud denies the Gentile status as a "man," so they are also excluded from being the Jews' neighbor. Another reason for discrimination was the vile and vicious character of the Gentiles... With such a character it would naturally be quite unsafe to trust a Gentile as a witness He could not be depended upon to keep his promise or word of honor like a Jew." (Bek. 13b) A Gentile. . . is not a 'neighbor' in the sense of reciprocating and being responsible for damages caused by his negligence; nor does he watch over his cattle. Even the best Gentile laws were too crude to admit of reciprocity. The meaning of these passages is obvious: As animals cannot be "neighbors" to men and as the behavior and laws of the animal world do not require observance by humans, so the Gentile world is beneath the Jewish. This source confirms: "The Torah outlawed the issue of a Gentile as that of a beast." In a Jewish Courtroom Jewish contempt for Gentile law was best illustrated in the courtroom. Imagine a Jewish court in Babylon in 350 A.D. as the Jewish Encyclopedia describes: It sometimes happened that the Gentile, wishing to take advantage of the liberal Jewish laws, summoned his Jewish opponent to a Jewish court. In such cases the Gentile would gain little benefit, as he would be dealt with by the Jewish or Gentile laws, as might be least advantageous to him. The judge would say: 'This is in accordance with our law' or 'with your law' as the case might be. If this was not satisfactory to the Gentile, legal quibbles and circumventions might be employed against him. The primary source for the above quote, Baba Kama 113a (Soncino edition), elaborates: Where a suit arises between an Israelite and a heathen, if you can satisfy the former according to the laws of Israel, justify him and say: 'this is our law'; so also if you can justify him by the laws of the heathens justify him and say (to the other party): 'This is your law; but if this cannot be done, we use subterfuges to circumvent them. This is the view of R. Ishmael, but R. Akiba said that we could not attempt to circumvent them on account of the sanctification of the Name. However, the same source comments: "but were there no infringement of the sanctification of the Name, we could circumvent him." By "sanctification of the Name," Rabbi Akiba refers to the dignity and reputation of God's name in the eyes of the world. If lying in the court may bring disrespect to Israel and thus to the God of the Hebrews will, then it had better not be done. The real question about perverting justice against a Gentile is whether a Jew can get away with it. The Jewish Encyclopedia summarizes the majority opinion, stating: "The Mishnah. . .declares that if a Gentile sue an Israelite, the verdict is the for defendant; if the Israelite is the plaintiff, he obtains full damages." [3] The Divine Right of Cheating Outright robbery of a Gentile is not endorsed, but the Talmud makes broad provision for indirect thievery; a Jew doesn't need to return a lost article to a Gentile. Baba Kama 113b continues: "And with all lost things of thy brother's: it is to your brother that you make restoration, but you need not make restoration to a heathen." As Rabbi Akiba warned, the Jew must avoid bringing God's name into dishonor by cheating Gentiles. Yet, as a passage in B.K. 113b, 114a reveals, Rabbi Samuel was not above cheating a Gentile out of the full price of a gold bowl, while Rabbi Kahana cheated a Gentile out of both the number and price of a quantity of barrels. A passage from the Talmud describes with praise how the head of a famous Talmudic academy cheated a Gentile out of a gold bowl for less than even a copper one was worth. This passage continues with examples of cheating from the likes of Rabina and Ashi, sages from the academy at Sura in Babylonia, and the two most important figures in the final editing of the Talmud. "Public Property" Despite the fear that defrauding Gentiles might bring dishonor God's name, the Talmud generally upholds the right of Jews to Gentiles' property. God "outlawed" Gentiles at Mt. Sinai and their property rights were now Israel's. The Rabbis by their own decree could at least theoretically declare the property of Gentiles to be ownerless. The Jewish Encyclopedia (p. 621) summarizes: All retaliation or measures of reprisal are based on the Jewish legal maxim of eminent domain, 'the judicial authority can annul the right to the possession of property and declare such property ownerless.' Pharisees: The Original Racists Perhaps the most remarkable feature of Rabbinic bias against the Gentile was that, in most cases, there is no mention of the possibility that the "goy" is doing his best or is the rightful owner of his property. He is viewed as a member of a class with known characteristics: The Jew is good, the Gentile bad; the Jew must be acquitted, the Gentile convicted. An essentially racist view of human nature was assumed. Indeed, the Pharisees were the original racists. Few religions possess such racist undertones as rabbinic Judaism. The bad example of the most respected sages of Israel had a widespread and corrosive effect on the relations of Jews with their neighbors. One wonders if the Gentiles were aware of their position as fair game to predatory Jews. Choschen Ham spells out some of the ground rules for exploiting Gentiles: If a Jew is doing good business with an Akum [Gentile] it is not allowed to other Jews in other places to come and do business with the same Akum. In other places, however, it is different, where another Jew is allowed to go to the same Akum, lead him in, do business with him and to deceive him and take his money. For the wealth of the Akum is to be regarded as common property and belongs to the first who can get it. And again: If a Jew is doing business with an Akum and a fellow Israelite comes along and defrauds the Akum, either by false measure, weight, or number, he must divide his profit with his fellow Israelite, since both had a part in the deal, and also to help him along. [4] Secret Hatred Just as the Talmud gives Jews the right to cheat Gentiles, so any inquiry into its true teachings by Gentiles is answered deceptively. This continues today. Jews must maintain a well-meaning appearance in order to dwell and trade among Gentiles. A commentary in Abodah Zarah (I, 2, fol. 7b) laments: "Since we are in captivity, we cannot live without trading with them, and we depend upon them for our food, and we must fear them. . . ." (Pranaitis, p. 65) For this reason, Jews were encouraged to practice philanthropy, even toward Gentiles. "Needy Gentiles may be helped as well as needy Jews," for the sake of peace. [5] Yet such expedients are to be employed only when there is no alternative. "Therefore," the Talmud says, If you enter a town and find them celebrating a feast, you may pretend to rejoice with them in order to hide your hatred. Those, however, who care about the salvation of their souls, should keep away from such celebrations. You should make it known that it is a hateful thing to rejoice with them, if you can do it without incurring their enmity. [6] Also: No one is allowed to praise them or say how good an Akum is. How much less to praise what they do or to recount anything about them which would redound to their glory. If, however, while praising them you intend to give glory to God, namely, because he has created comely creatures, then it is allowed to do so. [7] Gentiles: Keep Out Separatism between Jew and the corrupting Canaanites had a divinely sanctioned purpose in the time of Joshua. But the Pharisees nourished and intensified racism long after its usefulness was done. Gentiles were forbidden from becoming acquainted with the Jewish religion-an instruction never given by God. The Pharisees considered a Gentile so far beneath a Jew that hospitality or religious instruction were forbidden to him. In Sanh. 104a, "Hezekiah b. Hiyya deduces from II Kings XX.18 that he who shows hospitality to a heathen brings the penalty of exile upon his children." The Jewish Encyclopedia article on "Gentiles" (p. 621) heartily agrees: The Talmud comments on the untruthfulness of Gentiles (a band of strange children whose mouth speaketh vanity, and their right [in raising it to take an oath] is a right hand of falsehood) and contrasts it with the reputation of a Jew: The remnant of Israel shall not do iniquity nor speak lies; neither shall a deceitful tongue be found in their mouth. (Zeph. iii. 13) [8] Such holiness may be facilitated by following this suggestion from the Talmud as related by the Jewish Encyclopedia, p. 617, "Judah ben Illai recommends the daily recital of the benediction 'Blessed be thou who hast not made me a goy.'" Why Have Jews Been So Persecuted? What if these passages from the Talmud weren't written in the Talmud by authority of the Pharisees but in the New Testament by authority of Jesus? If they were, Jesus' followers would have become the most despised and mistrusted of men. Christians (if any survived) would have faced discrimination and even banishment from civilized society. People today would laugh at any Christian reply that their sufferings were caused by bigoted nations. Yet history books in our educational system describe the long saga of Jewish suffering as primarily caused by Christian "anti-semitic" bigotry against "innocent" Jews. Why have the Jews been exiled from 60 countries since they began to follow the leadership of the Pharisees nearly two millennia ago? It's because of something toxic within the religion of the Pharisees. Jesus put it most directly: Rabbinic Judaism is the "synagogue of Satan" (Rev 3:9)-the church that Satan goes to, the religion he inspired and owns. On Tuesday, February 23, 2016 at 9:17:18 AM UTC-6, Travis wrote: > > > > > > > > > *Da'wah, How Muslim Propagators Deceive the Infidels* > > February 22, 2016, Written by David Bukay > <http://moderndiplomacy.eu/index.php?option=com_k2&view=itemlist&task=user&id=461:davidbukay&Itemid=678>, > > Published in New Social Compact > <http://moderndiplomacy.eu/index.php?option=com_k2&view=itemlist&task=category&id=40:new-social-compact&Itemid=678> > > > http://moderndiplomacy.eu/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=1234:da-wah-how-muslim-propagators-deceive-the-infidels&Itemid=678 > > > > *Da'wah* is one of the three arms that operate the Islamic strategy, > together with *Jihad* and *Hijrah*. > > Among the three *Da'wah* is the most dangerous, just because Western > culture does not understand. It is the stealth devise, a means to deceive > and to mislead the infidels about the essence of Islam, its operational > aims and strategies, introducing the nice face of Islam as a religion of > peace and compassion. > > The motive of *Da'wah* is religious: the strengthening and expansion of > Islam, and it is based on the Qur'an commandments, which can be observed as > *Jihād > al-Da'wah*, the spreading of Islam among the infidels by peaceful > propagating means. It is intended to changing the infidels' minds and > behavior and to subverting their mode of thinking. It is a cultural > coercive strategy aimed at toppling Western democratic liberal regimes by > eliminating their freedoms and by infiltrating Western technology and > society's fabrics and destroying them from within. Where Jihad works on the > body, on the material structure, *Da'wah* works on the mental–spiritual > side as a persuasion means; where Jihad operates to terrorize and > intimidate, *Da'wah* aimed at deceiving, confusing, and misleading; where > Jihad acts to submit, *Da'wah* paves the way to Islamize. > > According to these lines, Jamal Badawi, one of the known Muslim > propagandists in the US, wrote an e-mail to Robert Spencer, on February 14 > 2005. The aim was to prove that all verses of the Qur'an are peaceful, and > that Islam promotes peace and it is against violence and wars: > > "The Qur’an prohibits compulsion in religion [2:256]. It teaches the > Oneness of God, acceptance and respect of all prophets [2:285], broad human > brotherhood [49:13], acceptance of plurality [5:48; 11:118], universal > justice and fair dealing [4:134, 5:8]. It demands just, kind and respectful > treatment of those who co-exist peacefully with Muslims [60:8-9]. Peaceful > dialogue with the People of the Book and the emphasis on common grounds > with them is a repeated theme in the Qur’an [3:64; 29:46, 5:5]. > > This list sums up most of the contemporary Islamic propaganda in plenty > internet sites and various publications. It is distinctive and highly > definitive that Muslim propagators purposely quote verses from the Qur'an > that were written in the early days of Islam at Mecca, where Muhammad was > weak and his followers were few and vulnerable. These passages make Islam > appear a bit compassionate and peaceful. However, the Islamic propaganda > that claims that the Meccan verses are dominant in Islamic teaching, is > either ignorant of actual Islamic doctrine and tidings, or it practices a > sophisticated deception of *Da'wah*. > > Well, the question is are these verses quoted above really mean what > Badawi says? It is easy to refute his claims as a pure propagation by > introducing the real meaning of the verses. > > *As about verse 2:256*, "no compulsion in religion," *La Ikrāh fīl-Dīn*. > Probably there is no verse more frequently cited by contemporary Muslims > propagators to mislead the infidels. Let's read verse 2:256 in entirety: > > There is no compulsion in religion. Truly the right way has become clearly > distinct from error; therefore, whoever disbelieves in Satan and believes > in Allah, indeed has laid hold on the firmest handle, which shall not break > off. > > This verse was given after the Badr War, in March 624. According to the > most authoritative Muslim exegetes, there are the following explanations to > the verse circumstances: > > First, the cause of this verse was the expulsion of the Jewish tribe of > Banu al-Nadir, and it has nothing to do with tolerance towards the other. > The women of *Ansar*, Arabs who joined Islam in Medina, used to make a > vow to convert their sons to Judaism if they lived. When the tribe of Banu > al-Nadir was expelled from Medina, some children of the *Ansar* were > among them, so their parents could not abandon them; hence Allah revealed: > “There is no compulsion in religion…” > > Second, according to Ibn Ishaq, in his *Sīrat Rasûl Allāh*, narrated Ibn > Abbas: it was revealed with regard to a man from the tribe of Bani Salim > whose two sons converted to Christianity but he was himself a Muslim. He > told the Prophet: “Shall I force them to embrace Islam as they insist on > Christianity”, hence Allah revealed this verse. But, continue Ibn Ishaq, it > was abrogated by the verses of “fighting” the infidels, in *Sûrat al-Fath*, > 48:16; *Sûrat al-Taubah*, 9:73; and *Sûrat al-Taubah*, 9:123. > > Third, according to Ibn Kathir: Allah says: “There is no compulsion in > religion”, meaning: do not force anyone to embrace Islam, because it is > clear and its proofs and evidences are manifest. Whoever Allah guides and > opens his heart to Islam has indeed embraced it with clear evidence. > Whoever Allah misguides and blinds his heart cannot embrace Islam by force. > Therefore, all people of the world should be called to Islam. If anyone of > them refuses to do so, or refuses to pay the Jizyah, they should be fought > till they are killed. This is the meaning of "compulsion." > > Fourth, according to Nahhas, with the authority of Ibn 'Abbas: "scholars > differed concerning 2:256. Some said it has been abrogated by *Sûrat > al-Taubah*, 9:73, for the Prophet compelled the Arabs to embrace Islam > and fought those that had no alternative but to surrender to Islam. Other > scholars said that it has not been abrogated concerning the People of the > Book. It is only the infidels who are compelled to embrace Islam, and upon > them 9:73 applies. The Prophet said: I have been ordered to fight against > the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but > Allah. This *Hadīth* is taken from the words of Allah in *Sûrat > al-Baqarah*, 2:193. Allah sent Muhammad calling people to Him, showing > the way to the truth... until the evidence of Allah's truth became manifest > ... He ordered him to call people by the sword..." > > Fifth, according to Suyuti, verse 2:256 was not abrogated by 9:73, but > this is a case of delaying or postponing the command to fight the infidels > until the Muslims become strong. This view exactly supports the issue: in > Mecca Muhammad was weak with few followers, and he could not resist his > enemies. From here the mild pronouncements concerning fighting his rivals. > However, in Medina Muhammad became strong, and he ordered the Believers to > fight the infidels. > > However, most important to understand the meaning of verse 2:256, is by > reading the following verse 2:257, which is connected to it. This sums up > the entire issue: > > Allah is the guardian of those who believe. He brings them out of the > darkness into the light, and as to those who disbelieve, their guardian is > Satan who takes them out of the light into the darkness. They are the > inmates of the fire, in it they shall abide forever. > > Concluding the issue, one has to look at the context, to realize there is > nothing compassionate and peace-loving here. No tolerance and no accepting > other religions as legitimate. Verse 2:257 confirms that 2:256 prove, by > definition and along its entire Scripture, that Islam is ethnocentric, > racist and homophobic. > > > > *As about 2:285*, in which Badawi says it "teaches the oneness of God, > acceptance and respect of all prophets." Well, Badawi is misleading as a > propagator. The verse says: > > The Apostle believes in what has been revealed to him *from his Lord*, > and so do the believers. They all believe in *Allah and his angels and > his book and his Apostles*. We make no difference between any of his > Apostles, and they say: *we hear and obey, our Allah* (emphasis is mine). > > That is, there is no pluralism and respect of the other. It is a firm > belief in Allah alone and in Islam as the only legitimate religion. > Moreover, this is the proof how Islam is compulsive and abusive. According > to Islamic Din al-Fitrah, all human being are Muslims from the beginning of > history to the end of the world. All Jewish and Christian prophets are > Muslims and all submit to Allah. It is totally opposite from pluralism and > tolerance. This is not exactly what Badawi says when he deceives the > infidels with his pure propagation. Islam is in fact ethnocentric and > racist. > > > > *As about 49:13*, in which Badawi says "broad human brotherhood." Well, > it is not exactly as he says. The verse declares: > > O people! We created you from a male and a female, and made you races and > tribes, that you may know one another. *The best among you in the sight > of Allah is the most righteous* (emphasis is mine). > > The verse refers to the Arabs alone. It is clear from the next verse > (49:14): > > The Desert-Arabs say, "We have believed." Say, "You have not believed; but > say, *'We have submitted*,' for faith has not yet entered into your > hearts. But *if you obey Allah and His Messenger*, He will not diminish > any of your deeds. Allah is Forgiving and Merciful" (emphasis is mine). > > There is absolutely no "broad human brotherhood," but submission to Islam > alone. by definition and along its entire Scripture, Islam is ethnocentric > and racist. > > *As about 5:48 and 11:118*, in which Badawi says "acceptance of > plurality." The analysis is far away from what he says: verse 5:48 declares: > > And we revealed to you the Book [Qur'an], with truth, confirming the > Scripture that preceded it, and *superseding it*. So judge [Muhammad] > between them *according to what Allah revealed*, [meaning the superiority > of the Qur'an] and do not follow their desires if they *differ from the > truth that has come to you*. For each of you we have assigned a law and a > method. Had Allah willed, He could have made you a single nation, but *He > tests you through what He has given you*. So compete in righteousness. To > Allah is your return, all of you; then He will inform you of what you had > disputed (emphasis is mine). > > It is also clear from the next verse (5:49): > > And *judge between them according to what Allah revealed*, and do not > follow their desires. And beware of them, lest they lure you away from some > of what Allah has revealed to you. *But if they turn away, know that > Allah intends to strike them with some of their sins*. In fact, a great > many people are corrupt (emphasis is mine). > > To be sure, verse 5:47 says: > > So let the *people of the Gospel rule according to what Allah revealed* > in it. *Those who do not rule according to what Allah revealed are the > sinners*. > > Verse 11:118 declares: > > Had your Lord willed, He could have made humanity one community, but *they > continue to differ* (emphasis is mine). > > This is not a declaration of plurality, but differentiation: those who are > not Muslims continue to differ and that is why Allah has not made humanity > one community. A proof comes from verses 11:117, and 11:119: > > Your Lord would never destroy the towns wrongfully, while their > inhabitants are righteous. > > Except those on whom your Lord has mercy-for that reason He created them. > The Word of your Lord is final: "I will fill Hell with jinn and humans, > altogether." > > These verses do not show any pluralism. On the contrary, by definition and > along its entire Scripture, Islam is ethnocentric, racist and homophobic. > > *As about verses 4:134, 5:8*, in which Badawi says "universal justice and > fair dealing." It is important to show these have nothing to do with the > subject matter. > > Whoever desires the reward of this world with Allah is the reward of this > world and the next. Allah is All-Hearing, All-Seeing. > > This verse has nothing to do with "universal justice and fair dealing." It > says: the Muslims loyal believers will receive Allah's rewards in this > world and the next. That is all. Moreover, the verses before and after > clear the issue: > > 4:132. To Allah belongs everything in the heavens and everything on earth. > God suffices as Manager. > > 4:133. If He wills, He can do away with you, O people, and bring others. > Allah is Able to do that. > > 4:135. O you who believe! Stand firmly for justice, as witnesses to Allah, > *even > if against yourselves, or your parents, or your relatives*. Whether one > is rich or poor, Allah takes care of both. So do not follow your desires, > lest you swerve. *If you deviate, or turn away, then Allah is Aware of > what you do*. > > As about 5:8. It relates only to the Muslims. > > *O you who believe!* Be upright to Allah, witnessing with justice; and > let not the hatred of a certain people [not Muslims] prevent you from > acting justly [to your fellow believers]. *Adhere to justice, for that is > nearer to piety; and fear Allah*. Allah is informed of what you do > (emphasis is mine). > > The verses before and after prove this issue clearly: > > And Remember Allah's blessings upon you, and His covenant which He > covenanted with you; *when you said, "We hear and we obey."* And remain > conscious of Allah, for Allah knows what the hearts contain. > > Allah has promised *those who believe and work righteousness*: they will > have forgiveness and a great reward (emphasis is mine). > > Concluding these, by definition and along its entire Scripture, Islam is > ethnocentric, racist and homophobic. > > > > *As about 60:8-9*, in which Badawi says Islam "demands just, kind and > respectful treatment of those who co-exist peacefully with Muslims." One > can only wonder how Badawi interpret these verses. The verses are as > follows: > > As for *those who have not fought against you for your religion*, nor > expelled you from your homes, Allah does not prohibit you from dealing with > them kindly and equitably. Allah loves the equitable. > > *But Allah prohibits you from befriending those who fought against you > over your religion*, and expelled you from your homes, and aided in your > expulsion. *Whoever takes them for friends-these are the wrongdoers*. > > These verses prove that those who resist Islamic coercive religion and > prefer not to become Muslims, their fate is to be fought. Islam is > ethnocentric and warmongering. > > > > *As about 3:64; 29:46, 5:5*, in which Badawi says Islam advocates for > "peaceful dialogue with the People of the Book and the emphasis on common > grounds with them is a repeated theme in the Qur’an." However, Badawi > reveals only a small portion of the truth. The verses are as follows: > > 3:64. Say, "O People of the Book, come to terms common between us and > you: that *we worship none but Allah*, and that *we associate nothing > with Him*, and that none of us takes others as lords besides Allah." *And > if they turn away, say, "Bear witness that we have submitted*." > > 5:5. Today all good things are made lawful for you. And the food of those > given the Scripture is lawful for you, and your food is lawful for them. So > are chaste believing women, and chaste women from the people who were given > the Scripture before you, provided you give them their dowries, and take > them in marriage, not in adultery, nor as mistresses. But *whoever > rejects faith, his work will be in vain, and in the Hereafter he will be > among the losers*. > > 29:46. And do not argue with the People of the Scripture except in the > best manner possible, except those who do wrong among them. And say, "We > believe in what was revealed to us, and in what was revealed to you; and *our > Allah and your Allah is One; and to Him we are submissive*" (all emphases > are mine). > > According to these verses it is not a peaceful dialogue but a coercive > one: if Jews and Christians accept Allah as their only deity, and associate > nothing with him, then there is a cooperation. However, if they stick to > their God then they are sinners. Even for women it is one-sided: Muslims > can take Jewish and Christian women but not vice-versa. But the issue is > much more complicated. Even in their prayer, in *Sūrat al-Fātihah*, verse > 7, Muslims disassociate themselves from the Jews, who have gone astray and > Christians, on whom there is the wrath of Allah. > > Unfortunately, Judaism and Christianity are rejected and not acceptable to > Allah, after he has sent his final messenger to the entire world. Jews are > sinners and transgressors and have therefore forfeited their status as the > chosen people. They are evil incarnate like devils, since they have killed > all the prophets. They have turned into monkeys and pigs destined to suffer > in Hellfire forever. > > As for Christianity, it is a corrupted and distorted religion based on > myths and legends. Jesus is a Muslim Prophet who asserts that the > foundations of Christianity, like the Trinity, are false, and that Christ’s > Divinity is a blasphemy. Christians are infidels and blasphemers and have > invented lies about Allah by ascribing partners to Allah, which is the > worst of sins. For that, they are condemned forever to Hell. Jesus will > come back and destroy Christianity by breaking the Cross, and on the Day of > Judgment he will be a witness against them. Indeed. On the Day of > Resurrection, Jews and Christians would take the place of Muslims in Hell. > > For Badawi's sake, here is an up-to-date version of Islamic behavior > concerning the non-Muslims: fighting is prescribed upon the believers > (2:216). It is Jihad in the cause of Allah (2:244 and other forty verses) > against the powers of Satan (4:76), the infidels and the hypocrites (9:5; > 9:73; 66:9), and the People of the Book (9:29). The order for the Muslims > is to smite their necks (47:4; 8:12) and to strike terror in their hearts > (3:151; 8:60), including the People of the Book (59:2), for the hereafter > world (4:74). For that, the Jihadi Muslims will earn paradise (3:195: 9:72: > 13:22-23; 47:4-6), and their reward will be black-eyed virgins (44:51-54; > 52:17-20; 56:22-24), and the utmost tiding is that they are not dead, but > alive, staying beside Allah (2:154; 3:169). > > > > > > > > > __._,_.___ > ------------------------------ > Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected] <javascript:>> > ------------------------------ > > > Visit Your Group > <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmMWNsODhpBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NTYyMzg2NTk-> > > > > [image: Yahoo! Groups] > <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlb2I0dWl0BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ1NjIzODY1OQ--> > > • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> • > Unsubscribe <javascript:> • Terms of Use > <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> > > __,_._,___ > > >
-- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
