I wrote and posted this in a conservative Group I belong to on Facebook. Right now, there's still a war, (that is hopefully dying down) between the Trump supporters versus the #NeverTrump crew. It's dawned on me that those who are #NeverTrump for the most part are "New World Order Globalists" in the mode of the Bush family, Mitt Romney, Lindsey Graham, and John McCain. Although they have a few "social conservative" traits, none of them are really conservative, and are most definitely opposed to a "Nationalist/America First" candidate, nor will they support any nationalist policies!
Plain Ol' *per-se* is not necessarily a "Globalist"; instead Plain Ol' is a Secular Progressive, which are aligned with Globalists and incorporate the loss of sovereignty in their anarchist Anti-American agenda. The goal of Secular Progressives is to do away with any and all religious tenets or foundation(s); and a global agenda is not necessarily ruled out! ====== I feel confident that you’re aware of the distinctions between the types of voters who make up the Republican Party; there are at least five or six groups of voters that usually coalesce and form a voting block as Republicans. I’m stereotyping here and generalizing; many of these characteristics by voters obviously overlap; but again, in general: The "Social Conservatives", or "traditionalists"; sometimes unflatteringly referred to as the "fundamentalist religious zealots"; of which family, church and community are their most important issues; The "Economic Conservatives"; where fiscal policy is of utmost importance; and who view nature as actually benign, encouraging individualism, experimentation, and entrepreneurship; The "Libertarians"; or "Constitutionalists; who in general look for a strict adherence to the Constitution, and a very limited, restricted government; The "Fatalists"; or; who up until recently were also referred to as "Neo-Cons"; (and I detest that term, because by definition, technically, all "Neo-Cons" are former Democrats) who in general believe in a strong central government, with a "Federalist" perspective. Ironically, (besides most of these “Mover’s and Shakers” being former Democrats; most all Fatalists are also who make up the “Ruling Class Elitist” “Establishment/Republican National Committee”; and what former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich refers to as “The Pseudo-Intellectual Georgetown Bar Crowd”. Besides the irony of all of this latter voting group being former Democrats, this “Fatalist” Group usually also holds the following policies and issues of utmost importance, such as: “Open-Borders”; “Consumerism”; “Feminism and Matriarchy”; “Multiculturalism, Diversity, and Egalitarianism”; “Global Solutions For Local Issues/Problems”; “Empire Building”; “Centralization” Again, ironically, these folks detest Donald Trump, and detest what he stands for; which is support for “Conservative/Nationalist” policies, such as: “Closed/Secured Borders” “Fair-Free Trade/Protectionism” “Patriarchy” “Homogeneous Population” “Monotheism” “Local Solutions For Local Issues/Problems” “War As Self Defense” “Decentralization” “Individual Rights” “Armed Populace” Again, after reading a number of your posts, it’s very clear to me where you fall within the voting blocks that usually make up the Republican Party. I just finished watching this video of Mr. Robert Welch from the John Birch Society; which was filmed in March of 1974. In this speech, he reads portions of his speech which was given back in 1958. I am now 59 years of age. I can remember back in my late teens and early twenties; (which would have been the late 1970s and early 1980s) of reading some of the John Birch Society's literature; (My recollection is that the literature that I'm referencing were flyers/brochures); and nothing that I read sounded all that kooky, misplaced or out of the norm...I remember thinking, even at 19 or 20 years of age, that most of what I read from the John Birch Society made sense to me. (I was in the U.S. Army at 19 years of age; 1976-1977; so maybe I wasn't the typical 19 or 20 year old) Nevertheless, most everyone that I knew politically, from both sides of the political spectrum labeled the John Birch Society as crackpots and kooks.... There is nothing that I hear from Mr.Welch that I find kooky or in the "Crackpot" mode! Why Mr. Welch's message didn't catch on and resonate with the American public forty and fifty-something years ago I believe can be attributed to the globalist, "New World Order" agenda, and these individuals can be found on both sides of the aisle! These Globalists, and we have many here in the Group Conservative Hammers, are the antipathy of what I believe a true Conservative, Nationalist candidate like Donald Trump represents, and of course they will not support not only Donald Trump, but any conservative that puts America and it’s populace first! Please watch the video and see the similarities! https://www.facebook.com/AwarenessAct/videos/1290777550936779/ On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:46 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected]> wrote: > Plain ole, is there anyone you like? > --- > it would be easier to answer who I don't like ... i.e., warmongering > abrahamics and US neocons who continually create more war. > > > On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 7:29:03 PM UTC-5, gtheist957 wrote: >> >> Plain ole, is there anyone you like? >> On May 17, 2016 3:55 PM, "plainolamerican" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> racist barbs at Pirro >>> --- >>> as if Italians are a separate race. >>> even the jews can't pull that one off. >>> >>> On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 3:44:00 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote: >>>> >>>> More Secular Progressive tripe.....Pirro is a successful television >>>> analyst; clearly more attractive, trustworthy and endearing than Hil >>>> Clinton. Yet Secular Progressives can only attack and sling hateful racist >>>> barbs at Pirro, all the while still attempting to maintain their moral >>>> high ground, which is laughable! >>>> >>>> You can't make this stuff up! Priceless! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:07 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> fuck that dago, Jeanine Pirro. >>>>> she's still pissed that Hillary beat the fuck out of her in the NY >>>>> senate race. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 2:56:42 PM UTC-5, Travis wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *Judge tells America – If Law Enforcement Won’t Stop Hillary, Voters >>>>>> Have To!* >>>>>> >>>>>> 9 hours ago >>>>>> >>>>>> [image: Description: Judge Jeanine Pirro 2] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Written by Onan Coca <http://eaglerising.com/author/onancoca/> >>>>>> >>>>>> *“Hillary Clinton cannot be President of the United States, and if >>>>>> the establishment, including law enforcement, does not stop her – you >>>>>> have >>>>>> to!”* – Judge Jeanine Pirro >>>>>> >>>>>> On the most recent episode of Fox News’ *Justice with Judge Jeanine* >>>>>> the eponymous host used her opening statement to remind the American >>>>>> voters >>>>>> of their responsibility to STOP Hillary Clinton from ever setting foot in >>>>>> the Oval Office again. The Judge encouraged voters that even (or >>>>>> especially) if our nation’s law enforcement chose to ignore their duty as >>>>>> sworn officers of the law, the people could not abdicate their duty of >>>>>> keeping that criminal out of office. Judge Jeanine the ran down a long >>>>>> (very long) list of the crimes that Clinton has been tied to in an effort >>>>>> to remind us all that Hillary Clinton may well be the least qualified >>>>>> (but >>>>>> most criminal) presidential candidate ever. >>>>>> >>>>>> Full Transcript from Fox News >>>>>> <http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/05/15/judge-jeanine-pirro-hillary-clinton-untrustworthy-dishonest-and-liar> >>>>>> : >>>>>> >>>>>> *Hillary Clinton cannot be President of the United States, and if the >>>>>> establishment including law enforcement does not stop her – you have to. >>>>>> * >>>>>> >>>>>> *This is not about politics. It’s about you, your family, and this >>>>>> great nation. It’s about preventing people who have no regard for the >>>>>> law, >>>>>> or you, for that matter, from running this country.* >>>>>> >>>>>> *At a time when just about everybody is fed up with establishment >>>>>> politicians, when two outsiders are winning epic contests against >>>>>> preordained presidential candidates, Hillary Clinton is still in line to >>>>>> be >>>>>> coronated the Democratic nominee for President of the United States. * >>>>>> >>>>>> *How can the woman – who is under criminal investigation – who knows >>>>>> she’s under criminal investigation, but lies to your face saying that >>>>>> she’s >>>>>> not – continue on her path to the White House?* >>>>>> >>>>>> *The majority of Americans believe, and are right, that Hillary >>>>>> Clinton is untrustworthy, dishonest and a liar. Hillary has danced with >>>>>> federal prosecutors for most of her career. She knows how to conceal, >>>>>> delete and destroy evidence – remember those pesky missing Rose Law Firm >>>>>> files? Not to mention 30,000 deleted emails… She lies so much she doesn’t >>>>>> know the difference between the truth and a lie, and, like most liars, >>>>>> can’t even keep her stories straight.* >>>>>> >>>>>> [image: Description: Hillary Criminal 2] >>>>>> <http://2lv0hm3wvpix464wwy2zh7d1.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Hillary-Criminal-2.jpg> >>>>>> *Example: this week – in response to Hillary’s claim that the FBI >>>>>> was doing a security inquiry on her private homebrewed server, one by the >>>>>> way conducted reportedly by over 100 FBI agents,FBI director Jim Comey >>>>>> says: security inquiry? I don’t know that term. We investigate crimes. >>>>>> This is a law enforcement proceeding. * >>>>>> >>>>>> *Now I told you that three months ago: now the cynics among you >>>>>> might say it’s all political. But Jim Comey is appointed by Barack Obama. >>>>>> And is one of the most clearheaded, logical and honorable people in >>>>>> Washington – a trait somewhat foreign to that town.* >>>>>> >>>>>> *And don’t give me that woman thing where it’s time for a female >>>>>> president. Yeah it is – but not her. * >>>>>> >>>>>> *What makes you think electing this woman who’s spent most of her >>>>>> career riding her husband’s coat tails is necessarily a good thing? >>>>>> Doesn’t >>>>>> it depend on the individual man or woman? For those of you who think a >>>>>> woman will help other women – consider this: the Clinton Foundation – an >>>>>> organization over which the Clintons have control – pays female employees >>>>>> 38 cents less per dollar than males. So much for that old pay inequality >>>>>> thing.* >>>>>> >>>>>> *Supporting women? Hillary made her bones creating the attack team >>>>>> on all the women who said Bill engaged in sexual activity, ranging from >>>>>> harassment to affairs to worse. If these women are all liars, why was >>>>>> Paula >>>>>> Jones awarded $850,000 from the Clintons? And Monica Lewinsky’s dress – >>>>>> if >>>>>> only that blue dress could talk.* >>>>>> >>>>>> *Which brings me to the Clinton Foundation, an alleged 501c3 not-for >>>>>> profit that I see as nothing more than a piggy bank for the Clintons, >>>>>> their >>>>>> friends and her presidential campaign. * >>>>>> >>>>>> *Just this week – it was reported that this wonderful charitable >>>>>> organization gave $2 million to Bill’s blonde divorcee friend, designated >>>>>> the energizer by the Secret Service when she visited him at home in >>>>>> Chappaqua when Hillary was on the road. * >>>>>> >>>>>> *The report in The Wall Street Journal says money from the charity >>>>>> was actually given to a for-profit company partly owned by Ms. >>>>>> “Energizer”. >>>>>> According to government watchdog groups, this may very well violate >>>>>> federal >>>>>> law. And consistent with past Clinton behavior, the destruction and/or >>>>>> removal of evidence begins.* >>>>>> >>>>>> *Shortly after the grant, Ms. Energizer’s company was reportedly >>>>>> removed from the Clinton Global Initiative’s website. I’m sure it was an >>>>>> oversight, like the moneys from countries to the foundation when Hillary >>>>>> was Secretary of State, over whom her department made decisions that >>>>>> benefited them.* >>>>>> >>>>>> *The Clintons have always been about the Clintons. Evidence: >>>>>> Benghazi. She lied about the video when she knew it was Al-Qaeda to >>>>>> benefit her politically. But even that doesn’t matter as much as knowing >>>>>> there are men waiting for help on a rooftop for eight hours when that >>>>>> assault on the consulate took place. Remember that 2008 3 am phone call >>>>>> she >>>>>> wants you to believe shows that she is ready to protect us? That’s >>>>>> baloney. >>>>>> She had a chance to prove it and she proved just the opposite. That her >>>>>> political future was more important than American lives.* >>>>>> >>>>>> *And the woman has no shame claiming that the parents of Tyrone Woods >>>>>> and Shawn Smith are lying, not her, about what she said to them as their >>>>>> children’s bodies were brought into Andrews. The woman has never been >>>>>> able >>>>>> to keep her stories straight. From one Blackberry for convenience and >>>>>> then >>>>>> there were three, and then there were 30,000 emails destroyed – she >>>>>> engages >>>>>> in the destruction of evidence to protect herself, like those pesky lost >>>>>> Rose Law Firm emails.* >>>>>> >>>>>> *And they are in it together. Bill just last week saying that email >>>>>> thing is kind of like a speeding ticket. No, Bill, it’s got nothing to do >>>>>> with speeding tickets. It’s got to do with espionage, conspiracy, >>>>>> destruction of evidence, concealment and risking the secrets of this >>>>>> great >>>>>> nation for the world to see. Russia has admitted it’s got 20,000 of her >>>>>> emails. Guccifer says that hacking her emails was one of the easiest >>>>>> things >>>>>> he’d ever done.* >>>>>> >>>>>> *So why do they get away with it? Why do they do things that if any >>>>>> of us – even a four-star general – does, would put us in jail? What is it >>>>>> about them that puts them above the law? I submit it is the people that >>>>>> are >>>>>> indebted to them, the people for whom the Clintons have done favors, the >>>>>> classic inside game.* >>>>>> >>>>>> *For years, Americans working two and three jobs to support their >>>>>> families have watched as Washington politicians elected to represent us >>>>>> walk into those hallowed chambers and proceed to line their pockets and >>>>>> their pensions and their campaign reelection coffers and walk out >>>>>> multi-millionaires. The Clintons are among the worst. * >>>>>> >>>>>> *If the establishment is not willing to admit that no one is above >>>>>> the law and is not willing to garner justice, then ordinary Americans >>>>>> need >>>>>> to make sure the scales of justice are level for all of us. * >>>>>> >>>>>> *The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of >>>>>> their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by >>>>>> EagleRising.com* >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> __._,_.___ >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Visit Your Group >>>>>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmZGNzdnJoBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NjM1MTEwNTI-> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> [image: Yahoo! Groups] >>>>>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlaDVncHU4BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ2MzUxMTA1Mg--> >>>>>> • Privacy >>>>>> <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> • >>>>>> Unsubscribe • Terms of Use >>>>>> <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> >>>>>> >>>>>> __,_._,___ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>> -- >>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>>> >>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>>> >>>>> --- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>> -- >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>> >>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>> >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
