The goal of Secular Progressives is to do away with any and all religious tenets --- because America is a secular nation and shouldn't tolerate religious myth believing assholes who wants the USA to be a theocracy.
On Wednesday, May 18, 2016 at 2:03:37 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote: > > I wrote and posted this in a conservative Group I belong to on Facebook. > Right now, there's still a war, (that is hopefully dying down) between the > Trump supporters versus the #NeverTrump crew. It's dawned on me that those > who are #NeverTrump for the most part are "New World Order Globalists" in > the mode of the Bush family, Mitt Romney, Lindsey Graham, and John McCain. > Although they have a few "social conservative" traits, none of them are > really conservative, and are most definitely opposed to a > "Nationalist/America First" candidate, nor will they support any > nationalist policies! > > Plain Ol' *per-se* is not necessarily a "Globalist"; instead Plain Ol' is > a Secular Progressive, which are aligned with Globalists and incorporate > the loss of sovereignty in their anarchist Anti-American agenda. The goal > of Secular Progressives is to do away with any and all religious tenets or > foundation(s); and a global agenda is not necessarily ruled out! > > ====== > > I feel confident that you’re aware of the distinctions between the types > of voters who make up the Republican Party; there are at least five or six > groups of voters that usually coalesce and form a voting block as > Republicans. I’m stereotyping here and generalizing; many of these > characteristics by voters obviously overlap; but again, in general: > > The "Social Conservatives", or "traditionalists"; sometimes unflatteringly > referred to as the "fundamentalist religious zealots"; of which family, > church and community are their most important issues; > > The "Economic Conservatives"; where fiscal policy is of utmost importance; > and who view nature as actually benign, encouraging individualism, > experimentation, and entrepreneurship; > > The "Libertarians"; or "Constitutionalists; who in general look for a > strict adherence to the Constitution, and a very limited, restricted > government; > > The "Fatalists"; or; who up until recently were also referred to as > "Neo-Cons"; (and I detest that term, because by definition, technically, > all "Neo-Cons" are former Democrats) who in general believe in a strong > central government, with a "Federalist" perspective. Ironically, (besides > most of these “Mover’s and Shakers” being former Democrats; most all > Fatalists are also who make up the “Ruling Class Elitist” > “Establishment/Republican National Committee”; and what former Speaker of > the House Newt Gingrich refers to as “The Pseudo-Intellectual Georgetown > Bar Crowd”. Besides the irony of all of this latter voting group being > former Democrats, this “Fatalist” Group usually also holds the following > policies and issues of utmost importance, such as: > > “Open-Borders”; > “Consumerism”; > “Feminism and Matriarchy”; > “Multiculturalism, Diversity, and Egalitarianism”; > “Global Solutions For Local Issues/Problems”; > “Empire Building”; > “Centralization” > > Again, ironically, these folks detest Donald Trump, and detest what he > stands for; which is support for “Conservative/Nationalist” policies, such > as: > > “Closed/Secured Borders” > “Fair-Free Trade/Protectionism” > “Patriarchy” > “Homogeneous Population” > “Monotheism” > “Local Solutions For Local Issues/Problems” > “War As Self Defense” > “Decentralization” > “Individual Rights” > “Armed Populace” > > Again, after reading a number of your posts, it’s very clear to me where > you fall within the voting blocks that usually make up the Republican > Party. > > I just finished watching this video of Mr. Robert Welch from the John > Birch Society; which was filmed in March of 1974. In this speech, he reads > portions of his speech which was given back in 1958. > > I am now 59 years of age. I can remember back in my late teens and early > twenties; (which would have been the late 1970s and early 1980s) of reading > some of the John Birch Society's literature; (My recollection is that the > literature that I'm referencing were flyers/brochures); and nothing that I > read sounded all that kooky, misplaced or out of the norm...I remember > thinking, even at 19 or 20 years of age, that most of what I read from the > John Birch Society made sense to me. (I was in the U.S. Army at 19 years of > age; 1976-1977; so maybe I wasn't the typical 19 or 20 year old) > > Nevertheless, most everyone that I knew politically, from both sides of > the political spectrum labeled the John Birch Society as crackpots and > kooks.... > > There is nothing that I hear from Mr.Welch that I find kooky or in the > "Crackpot" mode! Why Mr. Welch's message didn't catch on and resonate with > the American public forty and fifty-something years ago I believe can be > attributed to the globalist, "New World Order" agenda, and these > individuals can be found on both sides of the aisle! These Globalists, and > we have many here in the Group Conservative Hammers, are the antipathy of > what I believe a true Conservative, Nationalist candidate like Donald Trump > represents, and of course they will not support not only Donald Trump, but > any conservative that puts America and it’s populace first! Please watch > the video and see the similarities! > > https://www.facebook.com/AwarenessAct/videos/1290777550936779/ > > > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:46 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Plain ole, is there anyone you like? >> --- >> it would be easier to answer who I don't like ... i.e., warmongering >> abrahamics and US neocons who continually create more war. >> >> >> On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 7:29:03 PM UTC-5, gtheist957 wrote: >>> >>> Plain ole, is there anyone you like? >>> On May 17, 2016 3:55 PM, "plainolamerican" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> racist barbs at Pirro >>>> --- >>>> as if Italians are a separate race. >>>> even the jews can't pull that one off. >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 3:44:00 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote: >>>>> >>>>> More Secular Progressive tripe.....Pirro is a successful television >>>>> analyst; clearly more attractive, trustworthy and endearing than Hil >>>>> Clinton. Yet Secular Progressives can only attack and sling hateful >>>>> racist >>>>> barbs at Pirro, all the while still attempting to maintain their moral >>>>> high ground, which is laughable! >>>>> >>>>> You can't make this stuff up! Priceless! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:07 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected] >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> fuck that dago, Jeanine Pirro. >>>>>> she's still pissed that Hillary beat the fuck out of her in the NY >>>>>> senate race. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 2:56:42 PM UTC-5, Travis wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Judge tells America – If Law Enforcement Won’t Stop Hillary, Voters >>>>>>> Have To!* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 9 hours ago >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [image: Description: Judge Jeanine Pirro 2] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Written by Onan Coca <http://eaglerising.com/author/onancoca/> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *“Hillary Clinton cannot be President of the United States, and if >>>>>>> the establishment, including law enforcement, does not stop her – you >>>>>>> have >>>>>>> to!”* – Judge Jeanine Pirro >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On the most recent episode of Fox News’ *Justice with Judge Jeanine* >>>>>>> the eponymous host used her opening statement to remind the American >>>>>>> voters >>>>>>> of their responsibility to STOP Hillary Clinton from ever setting foot >>>>>>> in >>>>>>> the Oval Office again. The Judge encouraged voters that even (or >>>>>>> especially) if our nation’s law enforcement chose to ignore their duty >>>>>>> as >>>>>>> sworn officers of the law, the people could not abdicate their duty of >>>>>>> keeping that criminal out of office. Judge Jeanine the ran down a long >>>>>>> (very long) list of the crimes that Clinton has been tied to in an >>>>>>> effort >>>>>>> to remind us all that Hillary Clinton may well be the least qualified >>>>>>> (but >>>>>>> most criminal) presidential candidate ever. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Full Transcript from Fox News >>>>>>> <http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/05/15/judge-jeanine-pirro-hillary-clinton-untrustworthy-dishonest-and-liar> >>>>>>> : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Hillary Clinton cannot be President of the United States, and if >>>>>>> the establishment including law enforcement does not stop her – you >>>>>>> have >>>>>>> to. * >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *This is not about politics. It’s about you, your family, and this >>>>>>> great nation. It’s about preventing people who have no regard for the >>>>>>> law, >>>>>>> or you, for that matter, from running this country.* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *At a time when just about everybody is fed up with establishment >>>>>>> politicians, when two outsiders are winning epic contests against >>>>>>> preordained presidential candidates, Hillary Clinton is still in line >>>>>>> to be >>>>>>> coronated the Democratic nominee for President of the United States. * >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *How can the woman – who is under criminal investigation – who knows >>>>>>> she’s under criminal investigation, but lies to your face saying that >>>>>>> she’s >>>>>>> not – continue on her path to the White House?* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *The majority of Americans believe, and are right, that Hillary >>>>>>> Clinton is untrustworthy, dishonest and a liar. Hillary has danced with >>>>>>> federal prosecutors for most of her career. She knows how to conceal, >>>>>>> delete and destroy evidence – remember those pesky missing Rose Law >>>>>>> Firm >>>>>>> files? Not to mention 30,000 deleted emails… She lies so much she >>>>>>> doesn’t >>>>>>> know the difference between the truth and a lie, and, like most liars, >>>>>>> can’t even keep her stories straight.* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [image: Description: Hillary Criminal 2] >>>>>>> <http://2lv0hm3wvpix464wwy2zh7d1.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Hillary-Criminal-2.jpg> >>>>>>> *Example: this week – in response to Hillary’s claim that the FBI >>>>>>> was doing a security inquiry on her private homebrewed server, one by >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> way conducted reportedly by over 100 FBI agents,FBI director Jim Comey >>>>>>> says: security inquiry? I don’t know that term. We investigate crimes. >>>>>>> This is a law enforcement proceeding. * >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Now I told you that three months ago: now the cynics among you >>>>>>> might say it’s all political. But Jim Comey is appointed by Barack >>>>>>> Obama. >>>>>>> And is one of the most clearheaded, logical and honorable people in >>>>>>> Washington – a trait somewhat foreign to that town.* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *And don’t give me that woman thing where it’s time for a female >>>>>>> president. Yeah it is – but not her. * >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *What makes you think electing this woman who’s spent most of her >>>>>>> career riding her husband’s coat tails is necessarily a good thing? >>>>>>> Doesn’t >>>>>>> it depend on the individual man or woman? For those of you who think a >>>>>>> woman will help other women – consider this: the Clinton Foundation – >>>>>>> an >>>>>>> organization over which the Clintons have control – pays female >>>>>>> employees >>>>>>> 38 cents less per dollar than males. So much for that old pay >>>>>>> inequality >>>>>>> thing.* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Supporting women? Hillary made her bones creating the attack team >>>>>>> on all the women who said Bill engaged in sexual activity, ranging from >>>>>>> harassment to affairs to worse. If these women are all liars, why was >>>>>>> Paula >>>>>>> Jones awarded $850,000 from the Clintons? And Monica Lewinsky’s dress – >>>>>>> if >>>>>>> only that blue dress could talk.* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Which brings me to the Clinton Foundation, an alleged 501c3 not-for >>>>>>> profit that I see as nothing more than a piggy bank for the Clintons, >>>>>>> their >>>>>>> friends and her presidential campaign. * >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Just this week – it was reported that this wonderful charitable >>>>>>> organization gave $2 million to Bill’s blonde divorcee friend, >>>>>>> designated >>>>>>> the energizer by the Secret Service when she visited him at home in >>>>>>> Chappaqua when Hillary was on the road. * >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *The report in The Wall Street Journal says money from the charity >>>>>>> was actually given to a for-profit company partly owned by Ms. >>>>>>> “Energizer”. >>>>>>> According to government watchdog groups, this may very well violate >>>>>>> federal >>>>>>> law. And consistent with past Clinton behavior, the destruction and/or >>>>>>> removal of evidence begins.* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Shortly after the grant, Ms. Energizer’s company was reportedly >>>>>>> removed from the Clinton Global Initiative’s website. I’m sure it was >>>>>>> an >>>>>>> oversight, like the moneys from countries to the foundation when >>>>>>> Hillary >>>>>>> was Secretary of State, over whom her department made decisions that >>>>>>> benefited them.* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *The Clintons have always been about the Clintons. Evidence: >>>>>>> Benghazi. She lied about the video when she knew it was Al-Qaeda to >>>>>>> benefit her politically. But even that doesn’t matter as much as >>>>>>> knowing >>>>>>> there are men waiting for help on a rooftop for eight hours when that >>>>>>> assault on the consulate took place. Remember that 2008 3 am phone call >>>>>>> she >>>>>>> wants you to believe shows that she is ready to protect us? That’s >>>>>>> baloney. >>>>>>> She had a chance to prove it and she proved just the opposite. That her >>>>>>> political future was more important than American lives.* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *And the woman has no shame claiming that the parents of Tyrone >>>>>>> Woods and Shawn Smith are lying, not her, about what she said to them >>>>>>> as >>>>>>> their children’s bodies were brought into Andrews. The woman has never >>>>>>> been able to keep her stories straight. From one Blackberry for >>>>>>> convenience and then there were three, and then there were 30,000 >>>>>>> emails >>>>>>> destroyed – she engages in the destruction of evidence to protect >>>>>>> herself, >>>>>>> like those pesky lost Rose Law Firm emails.* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *And they are in it together. Bill just last week saying that email >>>>>>> thing is kind of like a speeding ticket. No, Bill, it’s got nothing to >>>>>>> do >>>>>>> with speeding tickets. It’s got to do with espionage, conspiracy, >>>>>>> destruction of evidence, concealment and risking the secrets of this >>>>>>> great >>>>>>> nation for the world to see. Russia has admitted it’s got 20,000 of her >>>>>>> emails. Guccifer says that hacking her emails was one of the easiest >>>>>>> things >>>>>>> he’d ever done.* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *So why do they get away with it? Why do they do things that if any >>>>>>> of us – even a four-star general – does, would put us in jail? What is >>>>>>> it >>>>>>> about them that puts them above the law? I submit it is the people that >>>>>>> are >>>>>>> indebted to them, the people for whom the Clintons have done favors, >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> classic inside game.* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *For years, Americans working two and three jobs to support their >>>>>>> families have watched as Washington politicians elected to represent us >>>>>>> walk into those hallowed chambers and proceed to line their pockets and >>>>>>> their pensions and their campaign reelection coffers and walk out >>>>>>> multi-millionaires. The Clintons are among the worst. * >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *If the establishment is not willing to admit that no one is above >>>>>>> the law and is not willing to garner justice, then ordinary Americans >>>>>>> need >>>>>>> to make sure the scales of justice are level for all of us. * >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of >>>>>>> their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by >>>>>>> EagleRising.com* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> __._,_.___ >>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>> Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]> >>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Visit Your Group >>>>>>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmZGNzdnJoBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NjM1MTEwNTI-> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [image: Yahoo! Groups] >>>>>>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlaDVncHU4BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ2MzUxMTA1Mg--> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> • Privacy >>>>>>> <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> • >>>>>>> Unsubscribe • Terms of Use >>>>>>> <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> __,_._,___ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>>>> >>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>>>> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> -- >>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>> >>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>> >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> -- >> -- >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "PoliticalForum" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
