Keith where do you see Paul Ryan fitting into your breakdown? I put him in the bush romney catagory. I don't see a compromise between trump and ryan using their rhetoric as a comparison. It would be interesting to see who really needs who.
On May 18, 2016 5:03 PM, "Keith In Tampa" <[email protected]> wrote: > And as is typical, the Secular Progessives lie, change the subject matter, > and place some false fictitious nuance out there, aas if this was the > subject matter and they have the high moral ground. > > I hope most of ya'll can see through this charade. > > > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:36 PM, plainolamerican < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> The goal of Secular Progressives is to do away with any and all >> religious tenets >> --- >> because America is a secular nation and shouldn't tolerate religious myth >> believing assholes who wants the USA to be a theocracy. >> >> On Wednesday, May 18, 2016 at 2:03:37 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote: >> >>> I wrote and posted this in a conservative Group I belong to on >>> Facebook. Right now, there's still a war, (that is hopefully dying down) >>> between the Trump supporters versus the #NeverTrump crew. It's dawned on >>> me that those who are #NeverTrump for the most part are "New World Order >>> Globalists" in the mode of the Bush family, Mitt Romney, Lindsey Graham, >>> and John McCain. Although they have a few "social conservative" traits, >>> none of them are really conservative, and are most definitely opposed to a >>> "Nationalist/America First" candidate, nor will they support any >>> nationalist policies! >>> >>> Plain Ol' *per-se* is not necessarily a "Globalist"; instead Plain Ol' >>> is a Secular Progressive, which are aligned with Globalists and incorporate >>> the loss of sovereignty in their anarchist Anti-American agenda. The goal >>> of Secular Progressives is to do away with any and all religious tenets or >>> foundation(s); and a global agenda is not necessarily ruled out! >>> >>> ====== >>> >>> I feel confident that you’re aware of the distinctions between the types >>> of voters who make up the Republican Party; there are at least five or six >>> groups of voters that usually coalesce and form a voting block as >>> Republicans. I’m stereotyping here and generalizing; many of these >>> characteristics by voters obviously overlap; but again, in general: >>> >>> The "Social Conservatives", or "traditionalists"; sometimes >>> unflatteringly referred to as the "fundamentalist religious zealots"; of >>> which family, church and community are their most important issues; >>> >>> The "Economic Conservatives"; where fiscal policy is of utmost >>> importance; and who view nature as actually benign, encouraging >>> individualism, experimentation, and entrepreneurship; >>> >>> The "Libertarians"; or "Constitutionalists; who in general look for a >>> strict adherence to the Constitution, and a very limited, restricted >>> government; >>> >>> The "Fatalists"; or; who up until recently were also referred to as >>> "Neo-Cons"; (and I detest that term, because by definition, technically, >>> all "Neo-Cons" are former Democrats) who in general believe in a strong >>> central government, with a "Federalist" perspective. Ironically, (besides >>> most of these “Mover’s and Shakers” being former Democrats; most all >>> Fatalists are also who make up the “Ruling Class Elitist” >>> “Establishment/Republican National Committee”; and what former Speaker of >>> the House Newt Gingrich refers to as “The Pseudo-Intellectual Georgetown >>> Bar Crowd”. Besides the irony of all of this latter voting group being >>> former Democrats, this “Fatalist” Group usually also holds the following >>> policies and issues of utmost importance, such as: >>> >>> “Open-Borders”; >>> “Consumerism”; >>> “Feminism and Matriarchy”; >>> “Multiculturalism, Diversity, and Egalitarianism”; >>> “Global Solutions For Local Issues/Problems”; >>> “Empire Building”; >>> “Centralization” >>> >>> Again, ironically, these folks detest Donald Trump, and detest what he >>> stands for; which is support for “Conservative/Nationalist” policies, such >>> as: >>> >>> “Closed/Secured Borders” >>> “Fair-Free Trade/Protectionism” >>> “Patriarchy” >>> “Homogeneous Population” >>> “Monotheism” >>> “Local Solutions For Local Issues/Problems” >>> “War As Self Defense” >>> “Decentralization” >>> “Individual Rights” >>> “Armed Populace” >>> >>> Again, after reading a number of your posts, it’s very clear to me where >>> you fall within the voting blocks that usually make up the Republican >>> Party. >>> >>> I just finished watching this video of Mr. Robert Welch from the John >>> Birch Society; which was filmed in March of 1974. In this speech, he reads >>> portions of his speech which was given back in 1958. >>> >>> I am now 59 years of age. I can remember back in my late teens and early >>> twenties; (which would have been the late 1970s and early 1980s) of reading >>> some of the John Birch Society's literature; (My recollection is that the >>> literature that I'm referencing were flyers/brochures); and nothing that I >>> read sounded all that kooky, misplaced or out of the norm...I remember >>> thinking, even at 19 or 20 years of age, that most of what I read from the >>> John Birch Society made sense to me. (I was in the U.S. Army at 19 years of >>> age; 1976-1977; so maybe I wasn't the typical 19 or 20 year old) >>> >>> Nevertheless, most everyone that I knew politically, from both sides of >>> the political spectrum labeled the John Birch Society as crackpots and >>> kooks.... >>> >>> There is nothing that I hear from Mr.Welch that I find kooky or in the >>> "Crackpot" mode! Why Mr. Welch's message didn't catch on and resonate with >>> the American public forty and fifty-something years ago I believe can be >>> attributed to the globalist, "New World Order" agenda, and these >>> individuals can be found on both sides of the aisle! These Globalists, and >>> we have many here in the Group Conservative Hammers, are the antipathy of >>> what I believe a true Conservative, Nationalist candidate like Donald Trump >>> represents, and of course they will not support not only Donald Trump, but >>> any conservative that puts America and it’s populace first! Please watch >>> the video and see the similarities! >>> >>> https://www.facebook.com/AwarenessAct/videos/1290777550936779/ >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:46 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Plain ole, is there anyone you like? >>>> --- >>>> it would be easier to answer who I don't like ... i.e., warmongering >>>> abrahamics and US neocons who continually create more war. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 7:29:03 PM UTC-5, gtheist957 wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Plain ole, is there anyone you like? >>>>> On May 17, 2016 3:55 PM, "plainolamerican" <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> racist barbs at Pirro >>>>>> --- >>>>>> as if Italians are a separate race. >>>>>> even the jews can't pull that one off. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 3:44:00 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> More Secular Progressive tripe.....Pirro is a successful television >>>>>>> analyst; clearly more attractive, trustworthy and endearing than Hil >>>>>>> Clinton. Yet Secular Progressives can only attack and sling hateful >>>>>>> racist >>>>>>> barbs at Pirro, all the while still attempting to maintain their moral >>>>>>> high ground, which is laughable! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can't make this stuff up! Priceless! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:07 PM, plainolamerican < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> fuck that dago, Jeanine Pirro. >>>>>>>> she's still pissed that Hillary beat the fuck out of her in the NY >>>>>>>> senate race. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 2:56:42 PM UTC-5, Travis wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Judge tells America – If Law Enforcement Won’t Stop Hillary, >>>>>>>>> Voters Have To!* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 9 hours ago >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [image: Description: Judge Jeanine Pirro 2] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Written by Onan Coca <http://eaglerising.com/author/onancoca/> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *“Hillary Clinton cannot be President of the United States, and if >>>>>>>>> the establishment, including law enforcement, does not stop her – you >>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>> to!”* – Judge Jeanine Pirro >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On the most recent episode of Fox News’ *Justice with Judge >>>>>>>>> Jeanine* the eponymous host used her opening statement to remind >>>>>>>>> the American voters of their responsibility to STOP Hillary Clinton >>>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>>> ever setting foot in the Oval Office again. The Judge encouraged >>>>>>>>> voters >>>>>>>>> that even (or especially) if our nation’s law enforcement chose to >>>>>>>>> ignore >>>>>>>>> their duty as sworn officers of the law, the people could not abdicate >>>>>>>>> their duty of keeping that criminal out of office. Judge Jeanine the >>>>>>>>> ran >>>>>>>>> down a long (very long) list of the crimes that Clinton has been tied >>>>>>>>> to in >>>>>>>>> an effort to remind us all that Hillary Clinton may well be the least >>>>>>>>> qualified (but most criminal) presidential candidate ever. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Full Transcript from Fox News >>>>>>>>> <http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/05/15/judge-jeanine-pirro-hillary-clinton-untrustworthy-dishonest-and-liar> >>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Hillary Clinton cannot be President of the United States, and if >>>>>>>>> the establishment including law enforcement does not stop her – you >>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>> to. * >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *This is not about politics. It’s about you, your family, and this >>>>>>>>> great nation. It’s about preventing people who have no regard for the >>>>>>>>> law, >>>>>>>>> or you, for that matter, from running this country.* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *At a time when just about everybody is fed up with establishment >>>>>>>>> politicians, when two outsiders are winning epic contests against >>>>>>>>> preordained presidential candidates, Hillary Clinton is still in line >>>>>>>>> to be >>>>>>>>> coronated the Democratic nominee for President of the United States. * >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *How can the woman – who is under criminal investigation – who >>>>>>>>> knows she’s under criminal investigation, but lies to your face >>>>>>>>> saying that >>>>>>>>> she’s not – continue on her path to the White House?* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *The majority of Americans believe, and are right, that Hillary >>>>>>>>> Clinton is untrustworthy, dishonest and a liar. Hillary has danced >>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>> federal prosecutors for most of her career. She knows how to conceal, >>>>>>>>> delete and destroy evidence – remember those pesky missing Rose Law >>>>>>>>> Firm >>>>>>>>> files? Not to mention 30,000 deleted emails… She lies so much she >>>>>>>>> doesn’t >>>>>>>>> know the difference between the truth and a lie, and, like most liars, >>>>>>>>> can’t even keep her stories straight.* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [image: Description: Hillary Criminal 2] >>>>>>>>> <http://2lv0hm3wvpix464wwy2zh7d1.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Hillary-Criminal-2.jpg> >>>>>>>>> *Example: this week – in response to Hillary’s claim that the FBI >>>>>>>>> was doing a security inquiry on her private homebrewed server, one by >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> way conducted reportedly by over 100 FBI agents,FBI director Jim Comey >>>>>>>>> says: security inquiry? I don’t know that term. We investigate crimes. >>>>>>>>> This is a law enforcement proceeding. * >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Now I told you that three months ago: now the cynics among you >>>>>>>>> might say it’s all political. But Jim Comey is appointed by Barack >>>>>>>>> Obama. >>>>>>>>> And is one of the most clearheaded, logical and honorable people in >>>>>>>>> Washington – a trait somewhat foreign to that town.* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *And don’t give me that woman thing where it’s time for a female >>>>>>>>> president. Yeah it is – but not her. * >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *What makes you think electing this woman who’s spent most of her >>>>>>>>> career riding her husband’s coat tails is necessarily a good thing? >>>>>>>>> Doesn’t >>>>>>>>> it depend on the individual man or woman? For those of you who think a >>>>>>>>> woman will help other women – consider this: the Clinton Foundation – >>>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>>> organization over which the Clintons have control – pays female >>>>>>>>> employees >>>>>>>>> 38 cents less per dollar than males. So much for that old pay >>>>>>>>> inequality >>>>>>>>> thing.* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Supporting women? Hillary made her bones creating the attack >>>>>>>>> team on all the women who said Bill engaged in sexual activity, >>>>>>>>> ranging >>>>>>>>> from harassment to affairs to worse. If these women are all liars, >>>>>>>>> why was >>>>>>>>> Paula Jones awarded $850,000 from the Clintons? And Monica Lewinsky’s >>>>>>>>> dress >>>>>>>>> – if only that blue dress could talk.* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Which brings me to the Clinton Foundation, an alleged 501c3 >>>>>>>>> not-for profit that I see as nothing more than a piggy bank for the >>>>>>>>> Clintons, their friends and her presidential campaign. * >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Just this week – it was reported that this wonderful charitable >>>>>>>>> organization gave $2 million to Bill’s blonde divorcee friend, >>>>>>>>> designated >>>>>>>>> the energizer by the Secret Service when she visited him at home in >>>>>>>>> Chappaqua when Hillary was on the road. * >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *The report in The Wall Street Journal says money from the charity >>>>>>>>> was actually given to a for-profit company partly owned by Ms. >>>>>>>>> “Energizer”. >>>>>>>>> According to government watchdog groups, this may very well violate >>>>>>>>> federal >>>>>>>>> law. And consistent with past Clinton behavior, the destruction and/or >>>>>>>>> removal of evidence begins.* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Shortly after the grant, Ms. Energizer’s company was reportedly >>>>>>>>> removed from the Clinton Global Initiative’s website. I’m sure it was >>>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>>> oversight, like the moneys from countries to the foundation when >>>>>>>>> Hillary >>>>>>>>> was Secretary of State, over whom her department made decisions that >>>>>>>>> benefited them.* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *The Clintons have always been about the Clintons. Evidence: >>>>>>>>> Benghazi. She lied about the video when she knew it was Al-Qaeda to >>>>>>>>> benefit her politically. But even that doesn’t matter as much as >>>>>>>>> knowing >>>>>>>>> there are men waiting for help on a rooftop for eight hours when that >>>>>>>>> assault on the consulate took place. Remember that 2008 3 am phone >>>>>>>>> call she >>>>>>>>> wants you to believe shows that she is ready to protect us? That’s >>>>>>>>> baloney. >>>>>>>>> She had a chance to prove it and she proved just the opposite. That >>>>>>>>> her >>>>>>>>> political future was more important than American lives.* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *And the woman has no shame claiming that the parents of Tyrone >>>>>>>>> Woods and Shawn Smith are lying, not her, about what she said to them >>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>> their children’s bodies were brought into Andrews. The woman has >>>>>>>>> never >>>>>>>>> been able to keep her stories straight. From one Blackberry for >>>>>>>>> convenience and then there were three, and then there were 30,000 >>>>>>>>> emails >>>>>>>>> destroyed – she engages in the destruction of evidence to protect >>>>>>>>> herself, >>>>>>>>> like those pesky lost Rose Law Firm emails.* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *And they are in it together. Bill just last week saying that >>>>>>>>> email thing is kind of like a speeding ticket. No, Bill, it’s got >>>>>>>>> nothing >>>>>>>>> to do with speeding tickets. It’s got to do with espionage, >>>>>>>>> conspiracy, >>>>>>>>> destruction of evidence, concealment and risking the secrets of this >>>>>>>>> great >>>>>>>>> nation for the world to see. Russia has admitted it’s got 20,000 of >>>>>>>>> her >>>>>>>>> emails. Guccifer says that hacking her emails was one of the easiest >>>>>>>>> things >>>>>>>>> he’d ever done.* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *So why do they get away with it? Why do they do things that if >>>>>>>>> any of us – even a four-star general – does, would put us in jail? >>>>>>>>> What is >>>>>>>>> it about them that puts them above the law? I submit it is the people >>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>> are indebted to them, the people for whom the Clintons have done >>>>>>>>> favors, >>>>>>>>> the classic inside game.* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *For years, Americans working two and three jobs to support their >>>>>>>>> families have watched as Washington politicians elected to represent >>>>>>>>> us >>>>>>>>> walk into those hallowed chambers and proceed to line their pockets >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>> their pensions and their campaign reelection coffers and walk out >>>>>>>>> multi-millionaires. The Clintons are among the worst. * >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *If the establishment is not willing to admit that no one is above >>>>>>>>> the law and is not willing to garner justice, then ordinary Americans >>>>>>>>> need >>>>>>>>> to make sure the scales of justice are level for all of us. * >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of >>>>>>>>> their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by >>>>>>>>> EagleRising.com* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> __._,_.___ >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>>> Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Visit Your Group >>>>>>>>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmZGNzdnJoBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NjM1MTEwNTI-> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [image: Yahoo! Groups] >>>>>>>>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlaDVncHU4BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ2MzUxMTA1Mg--> >>>>>>>>> • Privacy >>>>>>>>> <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> • >>>>>>>>> Unsubscribe • Terms of Use >>>>>>>>> <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> __,_._,___ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>>>>> For options & help see >>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>>>> >>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>>>> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> -- >>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>> >>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>> >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> >>> -- >> -- >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "PoliticalForum" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
