Opinion noted, and actually laughed at!  You're out of touch, but this is
nothing new!



On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 11:12 AM, plainolamerican <[email protected]
> wrote:

> I don't hate Trump ... I just think he's a fucking you nork asshole that
> Americans will never elect as potus.
>
> On Friday, May 20, 2016 at 10:52:14 AM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>
>> Keep on living in a state of fiction Plain Ol'!  The writing is already
>> on the wall, and the fat lady is already stage right, warming up!
>>
>>
>> ​
>>
>> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:26 AM, plainolamerican <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I don't need aid and Americans will never elect that nork pos loudmouth
>>> asshole Trump for potus.
>>>
>>> On Thursday, May 19, 2016 at 4:04:21 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>>>
>>>> You keep on dreaming and hoping that your Secular Progressive heroes
>>>> come to your aid Plain Ol'!  Like I said, it's going to be a very rude
>>>> awakening for you and your ilk.....
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 4:08 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  it's going to be a slam dunk come November!
>>>>> ---
>>>>> yep ... once again the Clinton's are going to beat the shit out of
>>>>> republicans.
>>>>>
>>>>> but it's not all good ... as Hillary is a zionist warmongering puke
>>>>> just like the neocon and zionist republicans.
>>>>>
>>>>> the bad news!
>>>>> the abrahamics can procreate faster than they can kill each other into
>>>>> extinction.
>>>>> The rest of the planet should wipe them out asap by any means
>>>>> necessary before the start using nukes.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thursday, May 19, 2016 at 2:35:39 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh you and your whole Secular Progressive crew are in for such a
>>>>>> shock!  Your Utopian March is over Plain Ol'!  I hope you've enjoyed the
>>>>>> last 7.5 years with a devisive, hateful Anti-Armed Forces; Anti-Business,
>>>>>> Secular Progressive President, because that little trip is over!  The
>>>>>> "Silent Majority" is no longer silent, and it's going to be a slam dunk
>>>>>> come November!   Your Anti-American charade is over! (Thank God!)  You
>>>>>> should consider maybe moving to Canad with the rest of your peeps!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 3:25 PM, plainolamerican <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  I meant where this conjecture by you was enumerated within our
>>>>>>> Constitution.  It's not
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> it doesn't have to be ... current laws and USSC decisions are all
>>>>>>> that matters.
>>>>>>> keep your mythical gods and religions out of our secular government
>>>>>>> and public schools and property.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thursday, May 19, 2016 at 2:19:07 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Citing something from the ACLU (A George Soros funded web site by
>>>>>>>> the way!)  is akin to citing the 10 Planks of the Communist
>>>>>>>> Manifesto....When I asked you to cite the "*Keeping out of
>>>>>>>> schools, and public property*" clause;  I meant where this
>>>>>>>> conjecture by you was enumerated within our Constitution.  It's not, 
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> there has never been such a notion, a quick look at Washington D.C. 
>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>> be all that you need to look at to know that your whole premise is 
>>>>>>>> flawed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> National Cathedral;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Washington D.C.:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ​
>>>>>>>> ​
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Supreme Court Building:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ​
>>>>>>>> ​
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 2:40 PM, plainolamerican <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Uhm.....Where is that whole "Keeping out of schools, and public
>>>>>>>>> property" clause enumerated?
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> Joint Statement of Current Law on Religion in the Public Schools
>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>> <https://www.aclu.org/joint-statement-current-law-religion-public-schools>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.aclu.org/joint-statement-current-*law*-*religi*...
>>>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/#>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    1.
>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>> <https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:dfUUZTiijz8J:https://www.aclu.org/joint-statement-current-law-religion-public-schools+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us>
>>>>>>>>>    2.
>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/search?biw=1366&bih=643&q=related:https://www.aclu.org/joint-statement-current-law-religion-public-schools+US+law+no+religion+in+schools&tbo=1&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiU8M_O5ObMAhULHT4KHUQ6CFUQHwggMAA>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> American Civil Liberties Union
>>>>>>>>> Students may be taught about religion, but public schools may not
>>>>>>>>>  teach religion. As the U.S.Supreme Court has repeatedly said,
>>>>>>>>> "[i]t might well be said that ...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Religious Holiday Displays on Public Property - Freedom From ...
>>>>>>>>> <http://ffrf.org/outreach/item/14019-religious-holiday-displays-on-public-property>
>>>>>>>>> ffrf.org/.../14019-*religious*-holiday-displays-on-*p*...
>>>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/#>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    1.
>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>> <http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:wEyh3wh5NCAJ:ffrf.org/outreach/item/14019-religious-holiday-displays-on-public-property+&cd=6&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us>
>>>>>>>>>    2.
>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/search?biw=1366&bih=643&q=related:ffrf.org/outreach/item/14019-religious-holiday-displays-on-public-property+US+law+no+religion+in+public+property&tbo=1&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiO4oPl5ObMAhWHQD4KHTSjC0kQHwhGMAU>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Freedom From Religion Foundation
>>>>>>>>> If you are concerned that your local, state, or federal government
>>>>>>>>> body is ... The Supreme Court has ruled that the government may
>>>>>>>>> not display nativity scenes at the ... Is the manger scene or
>>>>>>>>> otherreligious symbol on public property as part of an ... you
>>>>>>>>> think that your municipality or state is violating the existing
>>>>>>>>> law, you may ...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, May 19, 2016 at 1:32:38 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Uhm.....Where is that whole "Keeping out of schools, and public
>>>>>>>>>> property" clause enumerated?  Please cite that for us Plain Ol'.....
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:20 AM, plainolamerican <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Plain Ole the United States  began as a Christian nation settled
>>>>>>>>>>> mainly by Christians  fleeing religious persecution from other 
>>>>>>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>>>>>> sects.
>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>> and as soon as their communities developed they began
>>>>>>>>>>> persecuting and killing those with different beliefs.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.smithsonianmag.com/ist/?next=/history/americas-true-history-of-religious-tolerance-61312684/
>>>>>>>>>>> thankfully we had men like Thomas Jefferson to inform them that
>>>>>>>>>>> America is a secular nation.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>   The separation of church and state means that the federal
>>>>>>>>>>> government is prohibited from establishing a state sanctioned 
>>>>>>>>>>> religion like
>>>>>>>>>>> the church of england. For that reason. not the total eradication of
>>>>>>>>>>> religious expression.
>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>> afaic ...the religious are free to express themselves ... as
>>>>>>>>>>> long as they keep out of the government, schools and public 
>>>>>>>>>>> property.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, May 18, 2016 at 8:49:49 PM UTC-5, gtheist957 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Plain Ole the United States  began as a Christian nation
>>>>>>>>>>>> settled mainly by Christians  fleeing religious persecution from 
>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>> Christian sects.
>>>>>>>>>>>>   The separation of church and state means that the federal
>>>>>>>>>>>> government is prohibited from establishing a state sanctioned 
>>>>>>>>>>>> religion like
>>>>>>>>>>>> the church of england. For that reason. not the total eradication 
>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>> religious expression.
>>>>>>>>>>>> On May 18, 2016 2:37 PM, "plainolamerican" <
>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  The goal of Secular Progressives is to do away with any and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> all religious tenets
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>>> because America is a secular nation and shouldn't tolerate
>>>>>>>>>>>>> religious myth believing assholes who wants the USA to be a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> theocracy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, May 18, 2016 at 2:03:37 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wrote and posted this in a conservative Group I belong to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on Facebook.  Right now, there's still a war, (that is hopefully 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dying
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down) between the Trump supporters versus the #NeverTrump crew.  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dawned on me that those who are #NeverTrump for the most part 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are "New
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> World Order Globalists" in the mode of the Bush family, Mitt 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romney,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lindsey Graham, and John McCain.  Although they have a few 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "social
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conservative" traits, none of them are really conservative, and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are most
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definitely opposed to a "Nationalist/America First" candidate, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nor will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they support any nationalist policies!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Plain Ol' *per-se* is not necessarily a "Globalist"; instead
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Plain Ol' is a Secular Progressive, which are aligned with 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Globalists and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> incorporate the loss of sovereignty in their anarchist 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anti-American
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agenda.  The goal of Secular Progressives is to do away with any 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> religious tenets or foundation(s);  and a global agenda is not 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> necessarily
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ruled out!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ======
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I feel confident that you’re aware of the distinctions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between the types of voters who make up the Republican Party; 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least five or six groups of voters that usually coalesce and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> form a voting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> block as Republicans.  I’m stereotyping here and generalizing; 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these characteristics by voters obviously overlap; but again, in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> general:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The "Social Conservatives", or "traditionalists"; sometimes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unflatteringly referred to as the  "fundamentalist religious 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> zealots"; of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which family, church and community are their most important 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The "Economic Conservatives"; where fiscal policy is of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> utmost importance; and who view nature as actually benign, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> encouraging
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> individualism, experimentation, and entrepreneurship;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The "Libertarians"; or "Constitutionalists; who in general
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look for a strict adherence to the Constitution, and a very 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limited,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restricted government;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The "Fatalists"; or;  who up until recently were also
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> referred to as "Neo-Cons"; (and I detest that term, because by 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> technically, all "Neo-Cons" are former Democrats) who in general 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a strong central government, with a "Federalist" perspective.   
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ironically,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (besides most of these “Mover’s and Shakers” being former 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Democrats; most
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all Fatalists are also who make up the “Ruling Class Elitist”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  “Establishment/Republican National Committee”; and what former 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Speaker of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the House Newt Gingrich refers to as “The Pseudo-Intellectual 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Georgetown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bar Crowd”.   Besides the irony of all of this latter voting 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group being
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> former Democrats, this “Fatalist” Group usually also holds the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> policies and issues of utmost importance, such as:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  “Open-Borders”;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “Consumerism”;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “Feminism and Matriarchy”;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “Multiculturalism, Diversity, and Egalitarianism”;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “Global Solutions For Local Issues/Problems”;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “Empire Building”;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “Centralization”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Again, ironically, these folks detest Donald Trump, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> detest what he stands for; which is support for 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “Conservative/Nationalist”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> policies, such as:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “Closed/Secured Borders”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “Fair-Free Trade/Protectionism”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “Patriarchy”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “Homogeneous Population”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “Monotheism”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “Local Solutions For Local Issues/Problems”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “War As Self Defense”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “Decentralization”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “Individual Rights”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “Armed Populace”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Again, after reading a number of your posts, it’s very clear
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to me where you fall within the voting blocks that usually make 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republican Party.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just finished watching this video of  Mr. Robert Welch from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the John Birch Society; which was filmed in March of 1974.  In 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this speech,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he reads portions of his speech which was given back in 1958.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am now 59 years of age. I can remember back in my late
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> teens and early twenties; (which would have been the late 1970s 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and early
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1980s) of reading some of the John Birch Society's literature; 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (My
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recollection is that the literature that I'm referencing were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flyers/brochures); and nothing that I read sounded all that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kooky,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> misplaced or out of the norm...I remember thinking, even at 19 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or 20  years
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of age, that most of what I read from the John Birch Society 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> made sense to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me. (I was in the U.S. Army at 19 years of age; 1976-1977; so 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maybe I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wasn't the typical 19 or 20 year old)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Nevertheless, most everyone that I knew politically, from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both sides of the political spectrum labeled the John Birch 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Society as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> crackpots and kooks....
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is nothing that I hear from Mr.Welch that I find kooky
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or in the "Crackpot" mode! Why Mr. Welch's message didn't catch 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resonate with the American public forty and fifty-something 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years ago I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe can be attributed to the globalist, "New World Order" 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agenda, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these individuals can be found on both sides of the aisle!  These
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Globalists, and we have many here in the Group Conservative 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hammers, are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the antipathy of what I believe a true Conservative, Nationalist 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like Donald Trump represents, and of course they will not 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> support not only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump, but any conservative that puts America and it’s 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> populace
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first!  Please watch the video and see the similarities!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.facebook.com/AwarenessAct/videos/1290777550936779/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:46 PM, plainolamerican <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Plain ole, is there anyone you like?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it would be easier to answer who I don't like ... i.e.,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> warmongering abrahamics and US neocons who continually create 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more war.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 7:29:03 PM UTC-5, gtheist957
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Plain ole, is there anyone you like?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On May 17, 2016 3:55 PM, "plainolamerican" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> racist barbs at Pirro
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as if Italians are a separate race.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the jews can't pull that one off.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 3:44:00 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> More Secular Progressive tripe.....Pirro is a successful
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> television analyst;  clearly more attractive, trustworthy 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and endearing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than Hil Clinton.  Yet Secular Progressives can only attack 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and sling
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hateful racist barbs at Pirro,  all the while still 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attempting to maintain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their moral high ground, which is laughable!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can't make this stuff up!  Priceless!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:07 PM, plainolamerican <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuck that dago, Jeanine Pirro.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> she's still pissed that Hillary beat the fuck out of her
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the NY senate race.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 2:56:42 PM UTC-5, Travis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Judge tells America – If Law Enforcement Won’t Stop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hillary, Voters Have To!*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9 hours ago
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Description: Judge Jeanine Pirro 2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Written by Onan Coca
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://eaglerising.com/author/onancoca/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *“Hillary Clinton cannot be President of the United
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> States, and if the establishment, including law 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enforcement, does not stop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> her – you have to!”* – Judge Jeanine Pirro
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On the most recent episode of Fox News’ *Justice with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Judge Jeanine* the eponymous host used her opening
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> statement to remind the American voters of their 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> responsibility to STOP
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hillary Clinton from ever setting foot in the Oval Office 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again. The Judge
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> encouraged voters that even (or especially) if our 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nation’s law enforcement
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chose to ignore their duty as sworn officers of the law, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the people could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not abdicate their duty of keeping that criminal out of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> office. Judge
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jeanine the ran down a long (very long) list of the crimes 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that Clinton has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been tied to in an effort to remind us all that Hillary 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clinton may well be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the least qualified (but most criminal) presidential 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate ever.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Full Transcript from Fox News
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/05/15/judge-jeanine-pirro-hillary-clinton-untrustworthy-dishonest-and-liar>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Hillary Clinton cannot be President of the United
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> States, and if the establishment including law enforcement 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does not stop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> her – you have to. *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *This is not about politics. It’s about you, your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> family, and this great nation. It’s about preventing 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people who have no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regard for the law, or you, for that matter, from running 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this country.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *At a time when just about everybody is fed up with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> establishment politicians, when two outsiders are winning 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> epic contests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> against preordained presidential candidates, Hillary 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clinton is still in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line to be coronated the Democratic nominee for President 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the United
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> States. *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *How can the woman – who is under criminal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> investigation – who knows she’s under criminal 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> investigation, but lies to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your face saying that she’s not – continue on her path to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the White House?*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *The majority of Americans believe, and are right, that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hillary Clinton is untrustworthy, dishonest and a liar. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hillary has danced
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with federal prosecutors for most of her career. She knows 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how to conceal,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delete and destroy evidence – remember those pesky missing 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rose Law Firm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files? Not to mention 30,000 deleted emails… She lies so 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much she doesn’t
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know the difference between the truth and a lie, and, like 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> most liars,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can’t even keep her stories straight.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Description: Hillary Criminal 2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://2lv0hm3wvpix464wwy2zh7d1.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Hillary-Criminal-2.jpg>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Example:  this week – in response to Hillary’s claim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that the FBI was doing a security inquiry on her private 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> homebrewed server,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one by the way conducted reportedly by over 100 FBI 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agents,FBI director Jim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Comey says: security inquiry? I don’t know that term. We 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> investigate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> crimes.  This is a law enforcement proceeding. *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Now I told you that three months ago:  now the cynics
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> among you might say it’s all political. But Jim Comey is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appointed by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Barack Obama. And is one of the most clearheaded, logical 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and honorable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people in Washington – a trait somewhat foreign to that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> town.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *And don’t give me that woman thing where it’s time for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a female president.  Yeah it is – but not her. *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *What makes you think electing this woman who’s spent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> most of her career riding her husband’s coat tails is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> necessarily a good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thing? Doesn’t it depend on the individual man or woman? 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For those of you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who think a woman will help other women – consider this: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Clinton
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Foundation – an organization over which the Clintons have 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> control – pays
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> female employees 38 cents less per dollar than males. So 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for that old
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pay inequality thing.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Supporting women?  Hillary made her bones creating the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attack team on all the women who said Bill engaged in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sexual activity,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ranging from harassment to affairs to worse. If these 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> women are all liars,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> why was Paula Jones awarded $850,000 from the Clintons? 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And Monica
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lewinsky’s dress – if only that blue dress could talk.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Which brings me to the Clinton Foundation, an alleged
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 501c3 not-for profit that I see as nothing more than a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piggy bank for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clintons, their friends and her presidential campaign. *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Just this week – it was reported that this wonderful
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> charitable organization gave $2 million to Bill’s blonde 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> divorcee friend,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> designated the energizer by the Secret Service when she 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> visited him at home
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in Chappaqua when Hillary was on the road. *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *The report in The Wall Street Journal says money from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the charity was actually given to a for-profit company 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partly owned by Ms.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “Energizer”. According to government watchdog groups, this 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may very well
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> violate federal law. And consistent with past Clinton 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> behavior, the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destruction and/or removal of evidence begins.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Shortly after the grant, Ms. Energizer’s company was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reportedly removed from the Clinton Global Initiative’s 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> website. I’m sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it was an oversight, like the moneys from countries to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> foundation when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hillary was Secretary of State, over whom her department 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> made decisions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that benefited them.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *The Clintons have always been about the Clintons.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Evidence: Benghazi.  She lied about the video when she 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> knew it was Al-Qaeda
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to benefit her politically. But even that doesn’t matter 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as much as knowing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are men waiting for help on a rooftop for eight 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hours when that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assault on the consulate took place. Remember that 2008 3 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> am phone call she
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wants you to believe shows that she is ready to protect 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us? That’s baloney.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She had a chance to prove it and she proved just the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opposite. That her
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> political future was more important than American lives.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *And the woman has no shame claiming that the parents
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Tyrone Woods and Shawn Smith are lying, not her, about 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what she said to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them as their children’s bodies were brought into Andrews. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  The woman has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> never been able to keep her stories straight.  From one 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blackberry for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> convenience and then there were three, and then there were 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 30,000 emails
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroyed – she engages in the destruction of evidence to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protect herself,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like those pesky lost Rose Law Firm emails.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *And they are in it together. Bill just last week
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> saying that email thing is kind of like a speeding ticket. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, Bill, it’s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> got nothing to do with speeding tickets. It’s got to do 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with espionage,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conspiracy, destruction of evidence, concealment and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> risking the secrets of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this great nation for the world to see. Russia has 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> admitted it’s got 20,000
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of her emails. Guccifer says that hacking her emails was 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one of the easiest
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things he’d ever done.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *So why do they get away with it? Why do they do things
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that if any of us – even a four-star general – does, would 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> put us in jail?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What is it about them that puts them above the law? I 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> submit it is the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people that are indebted to them, the people for whom the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clintons have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> done favors, the classic inside game.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *For years, Americans working two and three jobs to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> support their families have watched as Washington 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> politicians elected to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> represent us walk into those hallowed chambers and proceed 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to line their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pockets and their pensions and their campaign reelection 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coffers and walk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out multi-millionaires. The Clintons are among the worst. *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *If the establishment is not willing to admit that no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one is above the law and is not willing to garner justice, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then ordinary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Americans need to make sure the scales of justice are 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> level for all of us. *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *The views expressed in this opinion article are solely
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those of their author and are not necessarily either 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shared or endorsed by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EagleRising.com*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> __._,_.___
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Visit Your Group
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmZGNzdnJoBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NjM1MTEwNTI->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Yahoo! Groups]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlaDVncHU4BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ2MzUxMTA1Mg-->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> • Privacy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> __,_._,___
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Groups.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For options & help see
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> polls.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from it, send an email to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For options & help see
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> polls.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from it, send an email to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For options & help see
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from it, send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For options & help see
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>>>>>>> For options & help see
>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>>>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>>>>> For options & help see
>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>> --
>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>
>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>> --
>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>
>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> --
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to