I don't hate Trump ... I just think he's a fucking you nork asshole that Americans will never elect as potus.
On Friday, May 20, 2016 at 10:52:14 AM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote: > > Keep on living in a state of fiction Plain Ol'! The writing is already on > the wall, and the fat lady is already stage right, warming up! > > > > > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:26 AM, plainolamerican <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> I don't need aid and Americans will never elect that nork pos loudmouth >> asshole Trump for potus. >> >> On Thursday, May 19, 2016 at 4:04:21 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote: >>> >>> You keep on dreaming and hoping that your Secular Progressive heroes >>> come to your aid Plain Ol'! Like I said, it's going to be a very rude >>> awakening for you and your ilk..... >>> >>> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 4:08 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> it's going to be a slam dunk come November! >>>> --- >>>> yep ... once again the Clinton's are going to beat the shit out of >>>> republicans. >>>> >>>> but it's not all good ... as Hillary is a zionist warmongering puke >>>> just like the neocon and zionist republicans. >>>> >>>> the bad news! >>>> the abrahamics can procreate faster than they can kill each other into >>>> extinction. >>>> The rest of the planet should wipe them out asap by any means necessary >>>> before the start using nukes. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thursday, May 19, 2016 at 2:35:39 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Oh you and your whole Secular Progressive crew are in for such a >>>>> shock! Your Utopian March is over Plain Ol'! I hope you've enjoyed the >>>>> last 7.5 years with a devisive, hateful Anti-Armed Forces; Anti-Business, >>>>> Secular Progressive President, because that little trip is over! The >>>>> "Silent Majority" is no longer silent, and it's going to be a slam dunk >>>>> come November! Your Anti-American charade is over! (Thank God!) You >>>>> should consider maybe moving to Canad with the rest of your peeps! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 3:25 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected] >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I meant where this conjecture by you was enumerated within our >>>>>> Constitution. It's not >>>>>> --- >>>>>> it doesn't have to be ... current laws and USSC decisions are all >>>>>> that matters. >>>>>> keep your mythical gods and religions out of our secular government >>>>>> and public schools and property. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thursday, May 19, 2016 at 2:19:07 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Citing something from the ACLU (A George Soros funded web site by >>>>>>> the way!) is akin to citing the 10 Planks of the Communist >>>>>>> Manifesto....When I asked you to cite the "*Keeping out of schools, >>>>>>> and public property*" clause; I meant where this conjecture by you >>>>>>> was enumerated within our Constitution. It's not, and there has never >>>>>>> been >>>>>>> such a notion, a quick look at Washington D.C. should be all that you >>>>>>> need >>>>>>> to look at to know that your whole premise is flawed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> National Cathedral; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Washington D.C.: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Supreme Court Building: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 2:40 PM, plainolamerican < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Uhm.....Where is that whole "Keeping out of schools, and public >>>>>>>> property" clause enumerated? >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> Joint Statement of Current Law on Religion in the Public Schools ... >>>>>>>> <https://www.aclu.org/joint-statement-current-law-religion-public-schools> >>>>>>>> https://www.aclu.org/joint-statement-current-*law*-*religi*... >>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/#> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:dfUUZTiijz8J:https://www.aclu.org/joint-statement-current-law-religion-public-schools+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us> >>>>>>>> 2. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/search?biw=1366&bih=643&q=related:https://www.aclu.org/joint-statement-current-law-religion-public-schools+US+law+no+religion+in+schools&tbo=1&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiU8M_O5ObMAhULHT4KHUQ6CFUQHwggMAA> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> American Civil Liberties Union >>>>>>>> Students may be taught about religion, but public schools may not >>>>>>>> teach religion. As the U.S.Supreme Court has repeatedly said, >>>>>>>> "[i]t might well be said that ... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Religious Holiday Displays on Public Property - Freedom From ... >>>>>>>> <http://ffrf.org/outreach/item/14019-religious-holiday-displays-on-public-property> >>>>>>>> ffrf.org/.../14019-*religious*-holiday-displays-on-*p*... >>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/#> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:wEyh3wh5NCAJ:ffrf.org/outreach/item/14019-religious-holiday-displays-on-public-property+&cd=6&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us> >>>>>>>> 2. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/search?biw=1366&bih=643&q=related:ffrf.org/outreach/item/14019-religious-holiday-displays-on-public-property+US+law+no+religion+in+public+property&tbo=1&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiO4oPl5ObMAhWHQD4KHTSjC0kQHwhGMAU> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Freedom From Religion Foundation >>>>>>>> If you are concerned that your local, state, or federal government >>>>>>>> body is ... The Supreme Court has ruled that the government may not >>>>>>>> display >>>>>>>> nativity scenes at the ... Is the manger scene or otherreligious >>>>>>>> symbol >>>>>>>> on public property as part of an ... you think that your >>>>>>>> municipality or state is violating the existing law, you may ... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thursday, May 19, 2016 at 1:32:38 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Uhm.....Where is that whole "Keeping out of schools, and public >>>>>>>>> property" clause enumerated? Please cite that for us Plain Ol'..... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:20 AM, plainolamerican < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Plain Ole the United States began as a Christian nation settled >>>>>>>>>> mainly by Christians fleeing religious persecution from other >>>>>>>>>> Christian >>>>>>>>>> sects. >>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>> and as soon as their communities developed they began persecuting >>>>>>>>>> and killing those with different beliefs. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.smithsonianmag.com/ist/?next=/history/americas-true-history-of-religious-tolerance-61312684/ >>>>>>>>>> thankfully we had men like Thomas Jefferson to inform them that >>>>>>>>>> America is a secular nation. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The separation of church and state means that the federal >>>>>>>>>> government is prohibited from establishing a state sanctioned >>>>>>>>>> religion like >>>>>>>>>> the church of england. For that reason. not the total eradication of >>>>>>>>>> religious expression. >>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>> afaic ...the religious are free to express themselves ... as long >>>>>>>>>> as they keep out of the government, schools and public property. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, May 18, 2016 at 8:49:49 PM UTC-5, gtheist957 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Plain Ole the United States began as a Christian nation settled >>>>>>>>>>> mainly by Christians fleeing religious persecution from other >>>>>>>>>>> Christian >>>>>>>>>>> sects. >>>>>>>>>>> The separation of church and state means that the federal >>>>>>>>>>> government is prohibited from establishing a state sanctioned >>>>>>>>>>> religion like >>>>>>>>>>> the church of england. For that reason. not the total eradication >>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>> religious expression. >>>>>>>>>>> On May 18, 2016 2:37 PM, "plainolamerican" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The goal of Secular Progressives is to do away with any and >>>>>>>>>>>> all religious tenets >>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>> because America is a secular nation and shouldn't tolerate >>>>>>>>>>>> religious myth believing assholes who wants the USA to be a >>>>>>>>>>>> theocracy. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, May 18, 2016 at 2:03:37 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I wrote and posted this in a conservative Group I belong to on >>>>>>>>>>>>> Facebook. Right now, there's still a war, (that is hopefully >>>>>>>>>>>>> dying down) >>>>>>>>>>>>> between the Trump supporters versus the #NeverTrump crew. It's >>>>>>>>>>>>> dawned on >>>>>>>>>>>>> me that those who are #NeverTrump for the most part are "New >>>>>>>>>>>>> World Order >>>>>>>>>>>>> Globalists" in the mode of the Bush family, Mitt Romney, Lindsey >>>>>>>>>>>>> Graham, >>>>>>>>>>>>> and John McCain. Although they have a few "social conservative" >>>>>>>>>>>>> traits, >>>>>>>>>>>>> none of them are really conservative, and are most definitely >>>>>>>>>>>>> opposed to a >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Nationalist/America First" candidate, nor will they support any >>>>>>>>>>>>> nationalist policies! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Plain Ol' *per-se* is not necessarily a "Globalist"; instead >>>>>>>>>>>>> Plain Ol' is a Secular Progressive, which are aligned with >>>>>>>>>>>>> Globalists and >>>>>>>>>>>>> incorporate the loss of sovereignty in their anarchist >>>>>>>>>>>>> Anti-American >>>>>>>>>>>>> agenda. The goal of Secular Progressives is to do away with any >>>>>>>>>>>>> and all >>>>>>>>>>>>> religious tenets or foundation(s); and a global agenda is not >>>>>>>>>>>>> necessarily >>>>>>>>>>>>> ruled out! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ====== >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I feel confident that you’re aware of the distinctions between >>>>>>>>>>>>> the types of voters who make up the Republican Party; there are >>>>>>>>>>>>> at least >>>>>>>>>>>>> five or six groups of voters that usually coalesce and form a >>>>>>>>>>>>> voting block >>>>>>>>>>>>> as Republicans. I’m stereotyping here and generalizing; many of >>>>>>>>>>>>> these >>>>>>>>>>>>> characteristics by voters obviously overlap; but again, in >>>>>>>>>>>>> general: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The "Social Conservatives", or "traditionalists"; sometimes >>>>>>>>>>>>> unflatteringly referred to as the "fundamentalist religious >>>>>>>>>>>>> zealots"; of >>>>>>>>>>>>> which family, church and community are their most important >>>>>>>>>>>>> issues; >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The "Economic Conservatives"; where fiscal policy is of utmost >>>>>>>>>>>>> importance; and who view nature as actually benign, encouraging >>>>>>>>>>>>> individualism, experimentation, and entrepreneurship; >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The "Libertarians"; or "Constitutionalists; who in general >>>>>>>>>>>>> look for a strict adherence to the Constitution, and a very >>>>>>>>>>>>> limited, >>>>>>>>>>>>> restricted government; >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The "Fatalists"; or; who up until recently were also referred >>>>>>>>>>>>> to as "Neo-Cons"; (and I detest that term, because by definition, >>>>>>>>>>>>> technically, all "Neo-Cons" are former Democrats) who in general >>>>>>>>>>>>> believe in >>>>>>>>>>>>> a strong central government, with a "Federalist" perspective. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ironically, >>>>>>>>>>>>> (besides most of these “Mover’s and Shakers” being former >>>>>>>>>>>>> Democrats; most >>>>>>>>>>>>> all Fatalists are also who make up the “Ruling Class Elitist” >>>>>>>>>>>>> “Establishment/Republican National Committee”; and what former >>>>>>>>>>>>> Speaker of >>>>>>>>>>>>> the House Newt Gingrich refers to as “The Pseudo-Intellectual >>>>>>>>>>>>> Georgetown >>>>>>>>>>>>> Bar Crowd”. Besides the irony of all of this latter voting >>>>>>>>>>>>> group being >>>>>>>>>>>>> former Democrats, this “Fatalist” Group usually also holds the >>>>>>>>>>>>> following >>>>>>>>>>>>> policies and issues of utmost importance, such as: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> “Open-Borders”; >>>>>>>>>>>>> “Consumerism”; >>>>>>>>>>>>> “Feminism and Matriarchy”; >>>>>>>>>>>>> “Multiculturalism, Diversity, and Egalitarianism”; >>>>>>>>>>>>> “Global Solutions For Local Issues/Problems”; >>>>>>>>>>>>> “Empire Building”; >>>>>>>>>>>>> “Centralization” >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Again, ironically, these folks detest Donald Trump, and detest >>>>>>>>>>>>> what he stands for; which is support for >>>>>>>>>>>>> “Conservative/Nationalist” >>>>>>>>>>>>> policies, such as: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> “Closed/Secured Borders” >>>>>>>>>>>>> “Fair-Free Trade/Protectionism” >>>>>>>>>>>>> “Patriarchy” >>>>>>>>>>>>> “Homogeneous Population” >>>>>>>>>>>>> “Monotheism” >>>>>>>>>>>>> “Local Solutions For Local Issues/Problems” >>>>>>>>>>>>> “War As Self Defense” >>>>>>>>>>>>> “Decentralization” >>>>>>>>>>>>> “Individual Rights” >>>>>>>>>>>>> “Armed Populace” >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Again, after reading a number of your posts, it’s very clear >>>>>>>>>>>>> to me where you fall within the voting blocks that usually make >>>>>>>>>>>>> up the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Republican Party. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I just finished watching this video of Mr. Robert Welch from >>>>>>>>>>>>> the John Birch Society; which was filmed in March of 1974. In >>>>>>>>>>>>> this speech, >>>>>>>>>>>>> he reads portions of his speech which was given back in 1958. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I am now 59 years of age. I can remember back in my late teens >>>>>>>>>>>>> and early twenties; (which would have been the late 1970s and >>>>>>>>>>>>> early 1980s) >>>>>>>>>>>>> of reading some of the John Birch Society's literature; (My >>>>>>>>>>>>> recollection is >>>>>>>>>>>>> that the literature that I'm referencing were flyers/brochures); >>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing that I read sounded all that kooky, misplaced or out of >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> norm...I remember thinking, even at 19 or 20 years of age, that >>>>>>>>>>>>> most of >>>>>>>>>>>>> what I read from the John Birch Society made sense to me. (I was >>>>>>>>>>>>> in the >>>>>>>>>>>>> U.S. Army at 19 years of age; 1976-1977; so maybe I wasn't the >>>>>>>>>>>>> typical 19 >>>>>>>>>>>>> or 20 year old) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nevertheless, most everyone that I knew politically, from >>>>>>>>>>>>> both sides of the political spectrum labeled the John Birch >>>>>>>>>>>>> Society as >>>>>>>>>>>>> crackpots and kooks.... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> There is nothing that I hear from Mr.Welch that I find kooky >>>>>>>>>>>>> or in the "Crackpot" mode! Why Mr. Welch's message didn't catch >>>>>>>>>>>>> on and >>>>>>>>>>>>> resonate with the American public forty and fifty-something years >>>>>>>>>>>>> ago I >>>>>>>>>>>>> believe can be attributed to the globalist, "New World Order" >>>>>>>>>>>>> agenda, and >>>>>>>>>>>>> these individuals can be found on both sides of the aisle! These >>>>>>>>>>>>> Globalists, and we have many here in the Group Conservative >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hammers, are >>>>>>>>>>>>> the antipathy of what I believe a true Conservative, Nationalist >>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate >>>>>>>>>>>>> like Donald Trump represents, and of course they will not support >>>>>>>>>>>>> not only >>>>>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump, but any conservative that puts America and it’s >>>>>>>>>>>>> populace >>>>>>>>>>>>> first! Please watch the video and see the similarities! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.facebook.com/AwarenessAct/videos/1290777550936779/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:46 PM, plainolamerican < >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Plain ole, is there anyone you like? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it would be easier to answer who I don't like ... i.e., >>>>>>>>>>>>>> warmongering abrahamics and US neocons who continually create >>>>>>>>>>>>>> more war. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 7:29:03 PM UTC-5, gtheist957 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Plain ole, is there anyone you like? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On May 17, 2016 3:55 PM, "plainolamerican" < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> racist barbs at Pirro >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as if Italians are a separate race. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the jews can't pull that one off. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 3:44:00 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> More Secular Progressive tripe.....Pirro is a successful >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> television analyst; clearly more attractive, trustworthy and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> endearing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than Hil Clinton. Yet Secular Progressives can only attack >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and sling >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hateful racist barbs at Pirro, all the while still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attempting to maintain >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their moral high ground, which is laughable! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can't make this stuff up! Priceless! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:07 PM, plainolamerican < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuck that dago, Jeanine Pirro. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> she's still pissed that Hillary beat the fuck out of her >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the NY senate race. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 2:56:42 PM UTC-5, Travis >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Judge tells America – If Law Enforcement Won’t Stop >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hillary, Voters Have To!* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9 hours ago >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Description: Judge Jeanine Pirro 2] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Written by Onan Coca >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://eaglerising.com/author/onancoca/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *“Hillary Clinton cannot be President of the United >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> States, and if the establishment, including law >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enforcement, does not stop >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> her – you have to!”* – Judge Jeanine Pirro >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On the most recent episode of Fox News’ *Justice with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Judge Jeanine* the eponymous host used her opening >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> statement to remind the American voters of their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> responsibility to STOP >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hillary Clinton from ever setting foot in the Oval Office >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again. The Judge >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> encouraged voters that even (or especially) if our nation’s >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> law enforcement >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chose to ignore their duty as sworn officers of the law, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the people could >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not abdicate their duty of keeping that criminal out of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> office. Judge >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jeanine the ran down a long (very long) list of the crimes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that Clinton has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been tied to in an effort to remind us all that Hillary >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clinton may well be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the least qualified (but most criminal) presidential >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate ever. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Full Transcript from Fox News >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/05/15/judge-jeanine-pirro-hillary-clinton-untrustworthy-dishonest-and-liar> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Hillary Clinton cannot be President of the United >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> States, and if the establishment including law enforcement >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does not stop >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> her – you have to. * >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *This is not about politics. It’s about you, your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> family, and this great nation. It’s about preventing people >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who have no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regard for the law, or you, for that matter, from running >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this country.* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *At a time when just about everybody is fed up with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> establishment politicians, when two outsiders are winning >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> epic contests >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> against preordained presidential candidates, Hillary >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clinton is still in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line to be coronated the Democratic nominee for President >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the United >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> States. * >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *How can the woman – who is under criminal investigation >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> – who knows she’s under criminal investigation, but lies to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your face >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> saying that she’s not – continue on her path to the White >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> House?* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *The majority of Americans believe, and are right, that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hillary Clinton is untrustworthy, dishonest and a liar. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hillary has danced >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with federal prosecutors for most of her career. She knows >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how to conceal, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delete and destroy evidence – remember those pesky missing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rose Law Firm >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files? Not to mention 30,000 deleted emails… She lies so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much she doesn’t >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know the difference between the truth and a lie, and, like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> most liars, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can’t even keep her stories straight.* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Description: Hillary Criminal 2] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://2lv0hm3wvpix464wwy2zh7d1.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Hillary-Criminal-2.jpg> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Example: this week – in response to Hillary’s claim >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that the FBI was doing a security inquiry on her private >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> homebrewed server, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one by the way conducted reportedly by over 100 FBI >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agents,FBI director Jim >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Comey says: security inquiry? I don’t know that term. We >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> investigate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> crimes. This is a law enforcement proceeding. * >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Now I told you that three months ago: now the cynics >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> among you might say it’s all political. But Jim Comey is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appointed by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Barack Obama. And is one of the most clearheaded, logical >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and honorable >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people in Washington – a trait somewhat foreign to that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> town.* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *And don’t give me that woman thing where it’s time for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a female president. Yeah it is – but not her. * >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *What makes you think electing this woman who’s spent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> most of her career riding her husband’s coat tails is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> necessarily a good >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thing? Doesn’t it depend on the individual man or woman? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For those of you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who think a woman will help other women – consider this: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Clinton >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Foundation – an organization over which the Clintons have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> control – pays >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> female employees 38 cents less per dollar than males. So >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for that old >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pay inequality thing.* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Supporting women? Hillary made her bones creating the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attack team on all the women who said Bill engaged in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sexual activity, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ranging from harassment to affairs to worse. If these women >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are all liars, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> why was Paula Jones awarded $850,000 from the Clintons? And >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Monica >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lewinsky’s dress – if only that blue dress could talk.* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Which brings me to the Clinton Foundation, an alleged >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 501c3 not-for profit that I see as nothing more than a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piggy bank for the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clintons, their friends and her presidential campaign. * >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Just this week – it was reported that this wonderful >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> charitable organization gave $2 million to Bill’s blonde >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> divorcee friend, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> designated the energizer by the Secret Service when she >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> visited him at home >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in Chappaqua when Hillary was on the road. * >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *The report in The Wall Street Journal says money from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the charity was actually given to a for-profit company >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partly owned by Ms. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “Energizer”. According to government watchdog groups, this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may very well >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> violate federal law. And consistent with past Clinton >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> behavior, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destruction and/or removal of evidence begins.* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Shortly after the grant, Ms. Energizer’s company was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reportedly removed from the Clinton Global Initiative’s >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> website. I’m sure >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it was an oversight, like the moneys from countries to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> foundation when >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hillary was Secretary of State, over whom her department >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> made decisions >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that benefited them.* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *The Clintons have always been about the Clintons. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Evidence: Benghazi. She lied about the video when she knew >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it was Al-Qaeda >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to benefit her politically. But even that doesn’t matter as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much as knowing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are men waiting for help on a rooftop for eight hours >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assault on the consulate took place. Remember that 2008 3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> am phone call she >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wants you to believe shows that she is ready to protect us? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That’s baloney. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She had a chance to prove it and she proved just the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opposite. That her >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> political future was more important than American lives.* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *And the woman has no shame claiming that the parents of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tyrone Woods and Shawn Smith are lying, not her, about what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> she said to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them as their children’s bodies were brought into Andrews. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The woman has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> never been able to keep her stories straight. From one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blackberry for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> convenience and then there were three, and then there were >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 30,000 emails >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroyed – she engages in the destruction of evidence to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protect herself, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like those pesky lost Rose Law Firm emails.* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *And they are in it together. Bill just last week saying >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that email thing is kind of like a speeding ticket. No, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bill, it’s got >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing to do with speeding tickets. It’s got to do with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> espionage, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conspiracy, destruction of evidence, concealment and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> risking the secrets of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this great nation for the world to see. Russia has admitted >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it’s got 20,000 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of her emails. Guccifer says that hacking her emails was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one of the easiest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things he’d ever done.* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *So why do they get away with it? Why do they do things >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that if any of us – even a four-star general – does, would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> put us in jail? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What is it about them that puts them above the law? I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> submit it is the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people that are indebted to them, the people for whom the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clintons have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> done favors, the classic inside game.* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *For years, Americans working two and three jobs to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> support their families have watched as Washington >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> politicians elected to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> represent us walk into those hallowed chambers and proceed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to line their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pockets and their pensions and their campaign reelection >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coffers and walk >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out multi-millionaires. The Clintons are among the worst. * >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *If the establishment is not willing to admit that no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one is above the law and is not willing to garner justice, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then ordinary >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Americans need to make sure the scales of justice are level >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for all of us. * >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *The views expressed in this opinion article are solely >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those of their author and are not necessarily either shared >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or endorsed by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EagleRising.com* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> __._,_.___ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Visit Your Group >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmZGNzdnJoBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NjM1MTEwNTI-> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Yahoo! Groups] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlaDVncHU4BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ2MzUxMTA1Mg--> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> • Privacy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> __,_._,___ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Groups. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For options & help see >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> polls. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from it, send an email to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For options & help see >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> polls. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from it, send an email to [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For options & help see >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>>>>>>>>> For options & help see >>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from >>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>>>>>>> For options & help see >>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>>>>> For options & help see >>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>>>> >>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>>>> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> -- >>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>> >>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>> >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> >>> -- >> -- >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "PoliticalForum" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
