I don't need aid and Americans will never elect that nork pos loudmouth 
asshole Trump for potus.

On Thursday, May 19, 2016 at 4:04:21 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>
> You keep on dreaming and hoping that your Secular Progressive heroes come 
> to your aid Plain Ol'!  Like I said, it's going to be a very rude awakening 
> for you and your ilk.....
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 4:08 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>>  it's going to be a slam dunk come November! 
>> ---
>> yep ... once again the Clinton's are going to beat the shit out of 
>> republicans.
>>
>> but it's not all good ... as Hillary is a zionist warmongering puke just 
>> like the neocon and zionist republicans.
>>
>> the bad news!
>> the abrahamics can procreate faster than they can kill each other into 
>> extinction. 
>> The rest of the planet should wipe them out asap by any means necessary 
>> before the start using nukes.
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, May 19, 2016 at 2:35:39 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>>
>>> Oh you and your whole Secular Progressive crew are in for such a shock!  
>>> Your Utopian March is over Plain Ol'!  I hope you've enjoyed the last 7.5 
>>> years with a devisive, hateful Anti-Armed Forces; Anti-Business, Secular 
>>> Progressive President, because that little trip is over!  The "Silent 
>>> Majority" is no longer silent, and it's going to be a slam dunk come 
>>> November!   Your Anti-American charade is over! (Thank God!)  You should 
>>> consider maybe moving to Canad with the rest of your peeps!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 3:25 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  I meant where this conjecture by you was enumerated within our 
>>>> Constitution.  It's not
>>>> ---
>>>> it doesn't have to be ... current laws and USSC decisions are all that 
>>>> matters.
>>>> keep your mythical gods and religions out of our secular government and 
>>>> public schools and property.
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday, May 19, 2016 at 2:19:07 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Citing something from the ACLU (A George Soros funded web site by the 
>>>>> way!)  is akin to citing the 10 Planks of the Communist Manifesto....When 
>>>>> I 
>>>>> asked you to cite the "*Keeping out of schools, and public property*" 
>>>>> clause;  I meant where this conjecture by you was enumerated within our 
>>>>> Constitution.  It's not, and there has never been such a notion, a quick 
>>>>> look at Washington D.C. should be all that you need to look at to know 
>>>>> that 
>>>>> your whole premise is flawed.
>>>>>
>>>>> National Cathedral;
>>>>>
>>>>> Washington D.C.:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ​
>>>>> ​
>>>>>
>>>>> Supreme Court Building:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ​
>>>>> ​
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 2:40 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected]
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Uhm.....Where is that whole "Keeping out of schools, and public 
>>>>>> property" clause enumerated?
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Joint Statement of Current Law on Religion in the Public Schools ... 
>>>>>> <https://www.aclu.org/joint-statement-current-law-religion-public-schools>
>>>>>> https://www.aclu.org/joint-statement-current-*law*-*religi*...
>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/#>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    1. 
>>>>>>    
>>>>>> <https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:dfUUZTiijz8J:https://www.aclu.org/joint-statement-current-law-religion-public-schools+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us>
>>>>>>    2. 
>>>>>>    
>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/search?biw=1366&bih=643&q=related:https://www.aclu.org/joint-statement-current-law-religion-public-schools+US+law+no+religion+in+schools&tbo=1&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiU8M_O5ObMAhULHT4KHUQ6CFUQHwggMAA>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> American Civil Liberties Union
>>>>>> Students may be taught about religion, but public schools may not
>>>>>>  teach religion. As the U.S.Supreme Court has repeatedly said, "[i]t 
>>>>>> might well be said that ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Religious Holiday Displays on Public Property - Freedom From ... 
>>>>>> <http://ffrf.org/outreach/item/14019-religious-holiday-displays-on-public-property>
>>>>>> ffrf.org/.../14019-*religious*-holiday-displays-on-*p*...
>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/#>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    1. 
>>>>>>    
>>>>>> <http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:wEyh3wh5NCAJ:ffrf.org/outreach/item/14019-religious-holiday-displays-on-public-property+&cd=6&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us>
>>>>>>    2. 
>>>>>>    
>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/search?biw=1366&bih=643&q=related:ffrf.org/outreach/item/14019-religious-holiday-displays-on-public-property+US+law+no+religion+in+public+property&tbo=1&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiO4oPl5ObMAhWHQD4KHTSjC0kQHwhGMAU>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Freedom From Religion Foundation
>>>>>> If you are concerned that your local, state, or federal government 
>>>>>> body is ... The Supreme Court has ruled that the government may not 
>>>>>> display 
>>>>>> nativity scenes at the ... Is the manger scene or otherreligious symbol 
>>>>>> on public property as part of an ... you think that your 
>>>>>> municipality or state is violating the existing law, you may ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thursday, May 19, 2016 at 1:32:38 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Uhm.....Where is that whole "Keeping out of schools, and public 
>>>>>>> property" clause enumerated?  Please cite that for us Plain Ol'.....
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:20 AM, plainolamerican <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Plain Ole the United States  began as a Christian nation settled 
>>>>>>>> mainly by Christians  fleeing religious persecution from other 
>>>>>>>> Christian 
>>>>>>>> sects.
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> and as soon as their communities developed they began persecuting 
>>>>>>>> and killing those with different beliefs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.smithsonianmag.com/ist/?next=/history/americas-true-history-of-religious-tolerance-61312684/
>>>>>>>> thankfully we had men like Thomas Jefferson to inform them that 
>>>>>>>> America is a secular nation.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   The separation of church and state means that the federal 
>>>>>>>> government is prohibited from establishing a state sanctioned religion 
>>>>>>>> like 
>>>>>>>> the church of england. For that reason. not the total eradication of 
>>>>>>>> religious expression.
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> afaic ...the religious are free to express themselves ... as long 
>>>>>>>> as they keep out of the government, schools and public property.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, May 18, 2016 at 8:49:49 PM UTC-5, gtheist957 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Plain Ole the United States  began as a Christian nation settled 
>>>>>>>>> mainly by Christians  fleeing religious persecution from other 
>>>>>>>>> Christian 
>>>>>>>>> sects.
>>>>>>>>>   The separation of church and state means that the federal 
>>>>>>>>> government is prohibited from establishing a state sanctioned 
>>>>>>>>> religion like 
>>>>>>>>> the church of england. For that reason. not the total eradication of 
>>>>>>>>> religious expression. 
>>>>>>>>> On May 18, 2016 2:37 PM, "plainolamerican" <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  The goal of Secular Progressives is to do away with any and all 
>>>>>>>>>> religious tenets
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> because America is a secular nation and shouldn't tolerate 
>>>>>>>>>> religious myth believing assholes who wants the USA to be a 
>>>>>>>>>> theocracy.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, May 18, 2016 at 2:03:37 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa 
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I wrote and posted this in a conservative Group I belong to on 
>>>>>>>>>>> Facebook.  Right now, there's still a war, (that is hopefully dying 
>>>>>>>>>>> down) 
>>>>>>>>>>> between the Trump supporters versus the #NeverTrump crew.  It's 
>>>>>>>>>>> dawned on 
>>>>>>>>>>> me that those who are #NeverTrump for the most part are "New World 
>>>>>>>>>>> Order 
>>>>>>>>>>> Globalists" in the mode of the Bush family, Mitt Romney, Lindsey 
>>>>>>>>>>> Graham, 
>>>>>>>>>>> and John McCain.  Although they have a few "social conservative" 
>>>>>>>>>>> traits, 
>>>>>>>>>>> none of them are really conservative, and are most definitely 
>>>>>>>>>>> opposed to a 
>>>>>>>>>>> "Nationalist/America First" candidate, nor will they support any 
>>>>>>>>>>> nationalist policies!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Plain Ol' *per-se* is not necessarily a "Globalist"; instead 
>>>>>>>>>>> Plain Ol' is a Secular Progressive, which are aligned with 
>>>>>>>>>>> Globalists and 
>>>>>>>>>>> incorporate the loss of sovereignty in their anarchist 
>>>>>>>>>>> Anti-American 
>>>>>>>>>>> agenda.  The goal of Secular Progressives is to do away with any 
>>>>>>>>>>> and all 
>>>>>>>>>>> religious tenets or foundation(s);  and a global agenda is not 
>>>>>>>>>>> necessarily 
>>>>>>>>>>> ruled out!  
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ======
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I feel confident that you’re aware of the distinctions between 
>>>>>>>>>>> the types of voters who make up the Republican Party; there are at 
>>>>>>>>>>> least 
>>>>>>>>>>> five or six groups of voters that usually coalesce and form a 
>>>>>>>>>>> voting block 
>>>>>>>>>>> as Republicans.  I’m stereotyping here and generalizing; many of 
>>>>>>>>>>> these 
>>>>>>>>>>> characteristics by voters obviously overlap; but again, in general: 
>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>> The "Social Conservatives", or "traditionalists"; sometimes 
>>>>>>>>>>> unflatteringly referred to as the  "fundamentalist religious 
>>>>>>>>>>> zealots"; of 
>>>>>>>>>>> which family, church and community are their most important issues; 
>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>> The "Economic Conservatives"; where fiscal policy is of utmost 
>>>>>>>>>>> importance; and who view nature as actually benign, encouraging 
>>>>>>>>>>> individualism, experimentation, and entrepreneurship;
>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>> The "Libertarians"; or "Constitutionalists; who in general look 
>>>>>>>>>>> for a strict adherence to the Constitution, and a very limited, 
>>>>>>>>>>> restricted 
>>>>>>>>>>> government;
>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>> The "Fatalists"; or;  who up until recently were also referred 
>>>>>>>>>>> to as "Neo-Cons"; (and I detest that term, because by definition, 
>>>>>>>>>>> technically, all "Neo-Cons" are former Democrats) who in general 
>>>>>>>>>>> believe in 
>>>>>>>>>>> a strong central government, with a "Federalist" perspective.   
>>>>>>>>>>> Ironically, 
>>>>>>>>>>> (besides most of these “Mover’s and Shakers” being former 
>>>>>>>>>>> Democrats; most 
>>>>>>>>>>> all Fatalists are also who make up the “Ruling Class Elitist” 
>>>>>>>>>>>  “Establishment/Republican National Committee”; and what former 
>>>>>>>>>>> Speaker of 
>>>>>>>>>>> the House Newt Gingrich refers to as “The Pseudo-Intellectual 
>>>>>>>>>>> Georgetown 
>>>>>>>>>>> Bar Crowd”.   Besides the irony of all of this latter voting group 
>>>>>>>>>>> being 
>>>>>>>>>>> former Democrats, this “Fatalist” Group usually also holds the 
>>>>>>>>>>> following 
>>>>>>>>>>> policies and issues of utmost importance, such as: 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  “Open-Borders”; 
>>>>>>>>>>> “Consumerism”; 
>>>>>>>>>>> “Feminism and Matriarchy”; 
>>>>>>>>>>> “Multiculturalism, Diversity, and Egalitarianism”; 
>>>>>>>>>>> “Global Solutions For Local Issues/Problems”; 
>>>>>>>>>>> “Empire Building”;
>>>>>>>>>>> “Centralization”
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Again, ironically, these folks detest Donald Trump, and detest 
>>>>>>>>>>> what he stands for; which is support for “Conservative/Nationalist” 
>>>>>>>>>>> policies, such as:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> “Closed/Secured Borders”
>>>>>>>>>>> “Fair-Free Trade/Protectionism”
>>>>>>>>>>> “Patriarchy”
>>>>>>>>>>> “Homogeneous Population”
>>>>>>>>>>> “Monotheism”
>>>>>>>>>>> “Local Solutions For Local Issues/Problems”
>>>>>>>>>>> “War As Self Defense”
>>>>>>>>>>> “Decentralization”
>>>>>>>>>>> “Individual Rights”
>>>>>>>>>>> “Armed Populace”
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Again, after reading a number of your posts, it’s very clear to 
>>>>>>>>>>> me where you fall within the voting blocks that usually make up the 
>>>>>>>>>>> Republican Party. 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I just finished watching this video of  Mr. Robert Welch from 
>>>>>>>>>>> the John Birch Society; which was filmed in March of 1974.  In this 
>>>>>>>>>>> speech, 
>>>>>>>>>>> he reads portions of his speech which was given back in 1958.  
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I am now 59 years of age. I can remember back in my late teens 
>>>>>>>>>>> and early twenties; (which would have been the late 1970s and early 
>>>>>>>>>>> 1980s) 
>>>>>>>>>>> of reading some of the John Birch Society's literature; (My 
>>>>>>>>>>> recollection is 
>>>>>>>>>>> that the literature that I'm referencing were flyers/brochures); 
>>>>>>>>>>> and 
>>>>>>>>>>> nothing that I read sounded all that kooky, misplaced or out of the 
>>>>>>>>>>> norm...I remember thinking, even at 19 or 20  years of age, that 
>>>>>>>>>>> most of 
>>>>>>>>>>> what I read from the John Birch Society made sense to me. (I was in 
>>>>>>>>>>> the 
>>>>>>>>>>> U.S. Army at 19 years of age; 1976-1977; so maybe I wasn't the 
>>>>>>>>>>> typical 19 
>>>>>>>>>>> or 20 year old)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  Nevertheless, most everyone that I knew politically, from both 
>>>>>>>>>>> sides of the political spectrum labeled the John Birch Society as 
>>>>>>>>>>> crackpots 
>>>>>>>>>>> and kooks....
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> There is nothing that I hear from Mr.Welch that I find kooky or 
>>>>>>>>>>> in the "Crackpot" mode! Why Mr. Welch's message didn't catch on and 
>>>>>>>>>>> resonate with the American public forty and fifty-something years 
>>>>>>>>>>> ago I 
>>>>>>>>>>> believe can be attributed to the globalist, "New World Order" 
>>>>>>>>>>> agenda, and 
>>>>>>>>>>> these individuals can be found on both sides of the aisle!  These 
>>>>>>>>>>> Globalists, and we have many here in the Group Conservative 
>>>>>>>>>>> Hammers, are 
>>>>>>>>>>> the antipathy of what I believe a true Conservative, Nationalist 
>>>>>>>>>>> candidate 
>>>>>>>>>>> like Donald Trump represents, and of course they will not support 
>>>>>>>>>>> not only 
>>>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump, but any conservative that puts America and it’s 
>>>>>>>>>>> populace 
>>>>>>>>>>> first!  Please watch the video and see the similarities!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.facebook.com/AwarenessAct/videos/1290777550936779/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:46 PM, plainolamerican <
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Plain ole, is there anyone you like?
>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>> it would be easier to answer who I don't like ... i.e., 
>>>>>>>>>>>> warmongering abrahamics and US neocons who continually create more 
>>>>>>>>>>>> war.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 7:29:03 PM UTC-5, gtheist957 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Plain ole, is there anyone you like? 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On May 17, 2016 3:55 PM, "plainolamerican" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> racist barbs at Pirro
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as if Italians are a separate race.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the jews can't pull that one off.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 3:44:00 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> More Secular Progressive tripe.....Pirro is a successful 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> television analyst;  clearly more attractive, trustworthy and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> endearing 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than Hil Clinton.  Yet Secular Progressives can only attack and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sling 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hateful racist barbs at Pirro,  all the while still attempting 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to maintain 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their moral high ground, which is laughable!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can't make this stuff up!  Priceless!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:07 PM, plainolamerican <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuck that dago, Jeanine Pirro.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> she's still pissed that Hillary beat the fuck out of her in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the NY senate race.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 2:56:42 PM UTC-5, Travis wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Judge tells America – If Law Enforcement Won’t Stop 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hillary, Voters Have To!*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9 hours ago
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Description: Judge Jeanine Pirro 2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Written by Onan Coca 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://eaglerising.com/author/onancoca/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *“Hillary Clinton cannot be President of the United 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> States, and if the establishment, including law enforcement, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does not stop 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> her – you have to!”* – Judge Jeanine Pirro
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On the most recent episode of Fox News’ *Justice with 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Judge Jeanine* the eponymous host used her opening 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> statement to remind the American voters of their 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> responsibility to STOP 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hillary Clinton from ever setting foot in the Oval Office 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again. The Judge 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> encouraged voters that even (or especially) if our nation’s 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> law enforcement 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chose to ignore their duty as sworn officers of the law, the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people could 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not abdicate their duty of keeping that criminal out of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> office. Judge 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jeanine the ran down a long (very long) list of the crimes 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that Clinton has 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been tied to in an effort to remind us all that Hillary 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clinton may well be 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the least qualified (but most criminal) presidential 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate ever.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Full Transcript from Fox News 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/05/15/judge-jeanine-pirro-hillary-clinton-untrustworthy-dishonest-and-liar>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Hillary Clinton cannot be President of the United States, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and if the establishment including law enforcement does not 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stop her – you 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have to. *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *This is not about politics. It’s about you, your family, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and this great nation. It’s about preventing people who have 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no regard for 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the law, or you, for that matter, from running this country.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *At a time when just about everybody is fed up with 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> establishment politicians, when two outsiders are winning 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> epic contests 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> against preordained presidential candidates, Hillary Clinton 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is still in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line to be coronated the Democratic nominee for President of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the United 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> States. *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *How can the woman – who is under criminal investigation – 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who knows she’s under criminal investigation, but lies to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your face saying 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that she’s not – continue on her path to the White House?*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *The majority of Americans believe, and are right, that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hillary Clinton is untrustworthy, dishonest and a liar. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hillary has danced 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with federal prosecutors for most of her career. She knows 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how to conceal, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delete and destroy evidence – remember those pesky missing 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rose Law Firm 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files? Not to mention 30,000 deleted emails… She lies so much 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> she doesn’t 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know the difference between the truth and a lie, and, like 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> most liars, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can’t even keep her stories straight.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Description: Hillary Criminal 2] 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://2lv0hm3wvpix464wwy2zh7d1.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Hillary-Criminal-2.jpg>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Example:  this week – in response to Hillary’s claim that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the FBI was doing a security inquiry on her private 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> homebrewed server, one 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by the way conducted reportedly by over 100 FBI agents,FBI 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> director Jim 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Comey says: security inquiry? I don’t know that term. We 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> investigate 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> crimes.  This is a law enforcement proceeding. *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Now I told you that three months ago:  now the cynics 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> among you might say it’s all political. But Jim Comey is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appointed by 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Barack Obama. And is one of the most clearheaded, logical and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> honorable 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people in Washington – a trait somewhat foreign to that town.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *And don’t give me that woman thing where it’s time for a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> female president.  Yeah it is – but not her. *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *What makes you think electing this woman who’s spent most 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of her career riding her husband’s coat tails is necessarily 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a good thing? 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doesn’t it depend on the individual man or woman? For those 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of you who 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think a woman will help other women – consider this: the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clinton Foundation 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> – an organization over which the Clintons have control – pays 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> female 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> employees 38 cents less per dollar than males. So much for 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that old pay 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inequality thing.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Supporting women?  Hillary made her bones creating the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attack team on all the women who said Bill engaged in sexual 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> activity, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ranging from harassment to affairs to worse. If these women 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are all liars, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> why was Paula Jones awarded $850,000 from the Clintons? And 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Monica 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lewinsky’s dress – if only that blue dress could talk.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Which brings me to the Clinton Foundation, an alleged 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 501c3 not-for profit that I see as nothing more than a piggy 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bank for the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clintons, their friends and her presidential campaign. *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Just this week – it was reported that this wonderful 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> charitable organization gave $2 million to Bill’s blonde 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> divorcee friend, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> designated the energizer by the Secret Service when she 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> visited him at home 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in Chappaqua when Hillary was on the road. *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *The report in The Wall Street Journal says money from the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> charity was actually given to a for-profit company partly 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned by Ms. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “Energizer”. According to government watchdog groups, this 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may very well 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> violate federal law. And consistent with past Clinton 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> behavior, the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destruction and/or removal of evidence begins.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Shortly after the grant, Ms. Energizer’s company was 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reportedly removed from the Clinton Global Initiative’s 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> website. I’m sure 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it was an oversight, like the moneys from countries to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> foundation when 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hillary was Secretary of State, over whom her department made 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decisions 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that benefited them.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *The Clintons have always been about the Clintons. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Evidence: Benghazi.  She lied about the video when she knew 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it was Al-Qaeda 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to benefit her politically. But even that doesn’t matter as 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much as knowing 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are men waiting for help on a rooftop for eight hours 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assault on the consulate took place. Remember that 2008 3 am 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> phone call she 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wants you to believe shows that she is ready to protect us? 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That’s baloney. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She had a chance to prove it and she proved just the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opposite. That her 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> political future was more important than American lives.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *And the woman has no shame claiming that the parents of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tyrone Woods and Shawn Smith are lying, not her, about what 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> she said to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them as their children’s bodies were brought into Andrews.  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The woman has 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> never been able to keep her stories straight.  From one 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blackberry for 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> convenience and then there were three, and then there were 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 30,000 emails 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroyed – she engages in the destruction of evidence to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protect herself, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like those pesky lost Rose Law Firm emails.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *And they are in it together. Bill just last week saying 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that email thing is kind of like a speeding ticket. No, Bill, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it’s got 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing to do with speeding tickets. It’s got to do with 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> espionage, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conspiracy, destruction of evidence, concealment and risking 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the secrets of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this great nation for the world to see. Russia has admitted 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it’s got 20,000 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of her emails. Guccifer says that hacking her emails was one 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the easiest 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things he’d ever done.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *So why do they get away with it? Why do they do things 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that if any of us – even a four-star general – does, would 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> put us in jail? 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What is it about them that puts them above the law? I submit 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it is the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people that are indebted to them, the people for whom the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clintons have 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> done favors, the classic inside game.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *For years, Americans working two and three jobs to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> support their families have watched as Washington politicians 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> elected to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> represent us walk into those hallowed chambers and proceed to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line their 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pockets and their pensions and their campaign reelection 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coffers and walk 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out multi-millionaires. The Clintons are among the worst. *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *If the establishment is not willing to admit that no one 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is above the law and is not willing to garner justice, then 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ordinary 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Americans need to make sure the scales of justice are level 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for all of us. *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *The views expressed in this opinion article are solely 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those of their author and are not necessarily either shared 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or endorsed by 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EagleRising.com*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> __._,_.___
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Visit Your Group 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmZGNzdnJoBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NjM1MTEwNTI->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Yahoo! Groups] 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlaDVncHU4BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ2MzUxMTA1Mg-->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> • Privacy 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> __,_._,___
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For options & help see 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> polls. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from it, send an email to [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For options & help see 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>>>>>>>> For options & help see 
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>>>>>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --- 
>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from 
>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>>>>>> For options & help see 
>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>>>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>>>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --- 
>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>>>> For options & help see 
>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --- 
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --- 
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>  
>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>
>>>> --- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>> -- 
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>  
>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "PoliticalForum" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to