Yes, it is curious that no government agency was tracking this, 
particularly when the guy who's in charge of the entire government has 
stated countless times that "we see too much of this". He doesn't know what 
he's seeing nor how much. But I'm sure he really cares and it's high on his 
list of priorities, right? I mean, the fact that he spent more time picking 
basketball brackets instead of looking into it is ok, right?

It is my understanding that the FBI tracks shootings, but it's believed 
that not all jurisdictions report. Kind of like the crazy shit that goes on 
with background checks. And sanctuary cities. Compliance with policies and 
even laws democrats keep screaming would save lives is strictly voluntary. 
And it occurs to NONE of them - including Obama - to make reporting this 
shit mandatory.

On Saturday, July 9, 2016 at 12:14:22 PM UTC-4, MJ wrote:
>
>
> WaPo took it upon themselves to track KILLINGS (curious how some G effort 
> was not already doing this).
> What of INCIDENTS .... 
>
> Just curious.
>
> Regard$,
> --MJ
>
> “Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it invites 
> every man to become a law unto himself.... To declare in the administration 
> of the criminal law the end justifies the means  to declare that the 
> government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction of a private 
> criminal [or, I would interject, to protect the impunity of a privileged 
> criminal]  would bring terrible retribution.”
> -- Justice Louis Brandeis, Olmstead v. U.S., 1928 (dissenting)
>
>
>
> At 12:11 PM 7/9/2016, you wrote:
>
> Again, FACTS MATTER.
>
> https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/police-shootings/
>
> Spend some time on this database learning the facts about police 
> shootings. 
>
> Of the 19/990 (<2%) unarmed blacks killed who were not in the process of 
> attacking or threatening a cop or another person at the time, the vast 
> majority of them were either resisting arrest and/or mentally ill 
> (schizophrenia most often mentioned). Three were accidental. One was an 
> innocent bystander who was shot while a black criminal in the act of 
> stealing a vehicle pointed a gun at cops (who opened fire). The black 
> criminal was subsequently charged with 2nd degree murder. Only ONE shows 
> clear evidence of murder by cop and that is Walter Scott. The cop who 
> murdered him was taken into custody and charged within hours - and rightly 
> so.
>
> There were only FIFTEEN unarmed blacks killed who were in the process of 
> attacking a cop when they were shot.
>
> That means only 3.4% of those killed by cops were unarmed blacks - 
> including those who were in the process of attacking a cop at the time they 
> were shot (trying to get the cops' gun or outright assault happened in many 
> of these cases).
>
> Now, if you want to look at overall statistics, 258/990 (26%) of those 
> killed by cops were black. Of those 258, 183 were deemed "attack in 
> progress". That leaves 63 who weren't attacking cops at the time they were 
> shot. Of those 63, 32 were brandishing weapons they refused to put down. 
>
> So we're down to  31 who weren't either attacking a cop or refusing to 
> surrender a weapon. Oh but wait, NINE of them were using their vehicles as 
> a weapon - trying to run over cops attempting to arrest them. 
>
> THAT LEAVES 22 who didn't fit in one of the categories below: attack in 
> progress, brandishing a weapon or refusing to put it down, or trying to run 
> over a cop with a vehicle. Three are unknown/disputed which gets us back to 
> the fact above that *ONLY NINETEEN BLACKS WERE KILLED BY POLICE who 
> weren't in the process of breaking the law or threatening cops or others. 
> That's 1.9% of those shot and killed by cops. *
>
> *Oh, and if you are really interested in pertinent facts, consider that 
> the FBI states that between 2003-2009 there were 98 MILLION ARRESTS during 
> a six-year period, pegging the number of police shootings during that time 
> at 0.005% of arrests.*
>
> But the leftloon narrative of the day is that it's "open season on 
> blacks". Fucking morons. Is it that they're dishonest (liars) or just 
> incredibly ignorant? It takes some kind of stupid to call police shooting 
> 19 blacks nationwide who didn't warrant it while ignoring the fact that  
> FOUR TIMES as many people have been murdered in Chicago alone (mostly 
> blacks by blacks) in half the time.
>
> http://crime.chicagotribune.com/chicago/homicides
>
>
> -- 
> -- 
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>  
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to