On a lighter note. Dana Loesch asked her followers on Twitter to name the "cop-killer killer robot".
The responses are pretty entertaining. https://twitter.com/dloesch/status/751960622766567424 C4PO is my fav. Thatbearguy @Thatbearguy On 11 July 2016 at 10:43, 'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum < [email protected]> wrote: > > I heard yesterday that the robot had a pound of C4 on it. No wonder they > didn't show the footage of blowing that POS up! > > On Sunday, July 10, 2016 at 1:07:00 PM UTC-4, KeithInTampa wrote: >> >> I agree Perp.....I see no distinction between using this mechanized robot >> which apparently had some type of cannon on it; versus using the Dallas >> Swat team. The author is attempting to portray this as some type of >> violation of our Constitutional rights, and I just don't see it that way. >> >> I genuinely believe, based on the news coverage of the whole incident >> that evening, that they were in contact with Johnson, (it was quite >> obvious that the Dallas Police Chief had "first hand" knowledge of what >> Johnson was conveying to Dallas Police long before the robot was engaged) >> and yes, there was some attempt to get Johnson to surrender. >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 12:40 PM, 'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> I fail to see the difference in terms of morality between sending in 20 >>> cops with machine guns (and risking some or all of them being blown up by a >>> terrorist - which this guy WAS) vs. sending in a remote-controlled weapon >>> to take him out. The decision-making would be the same - determining he was >>> guilty without trial and needed to be killed. The only thing using a robot >>> to do it with achieved was to preserve the lives of LEOs. How is that a >>> dangerous thing? I applaud it, and only wish we had had similar capability >>> to take out the terrorist in Orlando without harming innocents before he >>> killed 49 of them. >>> >>> >>> On Sunday, July 10, 2016 at 12:09:31 PM UTC-4, MJ wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> July 9th, 2016 >>>> >>>> *A Drone Was Used to Blow up a US Citizen Without Trial Yesterday. Let >>>> That Sink In *by hqanon >>>> >>>> * ( RPI >>>> <http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/peace-and-prosperity/2016/july/08/in-dallas-drone-wars-just-came-home/>) >>>> *The Dallas shootings have ushered in a very new world for U.S. >>>> citizens. For the very first time, a drone has been used on U.S. soil to >>>> kill an American without trial or charges. >>>> >>>> The suspected shooter in yesterday’s tragic killings, U.S. Army veteran >>>> Micah Xavier Johnson, was, according to police and press reports, holed up >>>> in a parking garage and would not give himself up. After hours of what >>>> police claimed were fruitless negotiations with Johnson, a weaponized >>>> robot was sent >>>> <http://undergroundreporter.org/killer-robot-dallas-human-rights/> to >>>> where he was hiding and blown up, taking Johnson with it. >>>> >>>> Get past the horror of what Johnson was accused of doing and think >>>> about that precedent for a moment. Is it not chilling? >>>> >>>> RPI regular contributor Peter Van Buren, a retired State Department >>>> official who did a tour in Iraq, put a very fine point on the “robot” bomb: >>>> >>>> [image: Emacs!] >>>> >>>> Indeed, even without wings, this was a drone sent in to kill an >>>> American suspected of a crime. >>>> >>>> Police claim that continuing the negotiations was pointless and >>>> attempting to capture him would have put officers at risk. He was >>>> supposedly shooting. While no sane person wants police officers to be >>>> killed, risk is something we are told they willingly accept when they sign >>>> up for police duty. There are plenty of low-risk jobs out there. >>>> >>>> The media and opinion-leaders are presenting us with a false choice: if >>>> we question the use of drones to kill Americans even if we suspect they >>>> have done very bad things we somehow do not care about the lives of >>>> police officers. That is not the case. It is perfectly possible to not want >>>> police officers to be killed in the line of duty but to wholeheartedly >>>> reject the idea of authorities using drones to remotely kill Americans >>>> before they are found guilty. >>>> >>>> African-American Dallas protester Mark Hughes was wrongly identified >>>> <http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2016/07/08/3796589/dallas-misidentified-suspect/> >>>> by Dallas Police as a suspect in the shootings. Police tweeted photos of >>>> Hughes marching with protesters openly carrying a rifle, as is permitted in >>>> Texas. Police claimed he was involved in the shooting. He was a suspect >>>> just like Johnson was a suspect. During questioning they told Hughes >>>> that they had video of him shooting people >>>> <http://www.rawstory.com/2016/07/man-wrongly-idd-as-dallas-shooting-person-of-interest-says-cops-lied-to-him-during-interrogation/>, >>>> which was a lie. What if police had sent in a drone to take out Mark >>>> Hughes? What will happen in the future to a future Mark Hughes, falsely >>>> accused by police of being involved in a shooting? Will we come to accept >>>> murder without trial? >>>> >>>> >>>> http://anonhq.com/drone-used-blow-us-citizen-without-trial-yesterday-let-sink-inrpi-dallas-shootings-ushered-new-world-u-s-citizens-first-time-drone/ >>>> >>> -- >>> -- >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>> >>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>> >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
