LOL, those are hilarious! On Monday, July 11, 2016 at 11:13:02 AM UTC-4, Bear Guy wrote: > > On a lighter note. Dana Loesch asked her followers on Twitter to name the > "cop-killer killer robot". > > The responses are pretty entertaining. > > https://twitter.com/dloesch/status/751960622766567424 > > C4PO is my fav. > > Thatbearguy > @Thatbearguy > > > > On 11 July 2016 at 10:43, 'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum < > [email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: > >> >> I heard yesterday that the robot had a pound of C4 on it. No wonder they >> didn't show the footage of blowing that POS up! >> >> On Sunday, July 10, 2016 at 1:07:00 PM UTC-4, KeithInTampa wrote: >>> >>> I agree Perp.....I see no distinction between using this mechanized >>> robot which apparently had some type of cannon on it; versus using the >>> Dallas Swat team. The author is attempting to portray this as some type of >>> violation of our Constitutional rights, and I just don't see it that way. >>> >>> I genuinely believe, based on the news coverage of the whole incident >>> that evening, that they were in contact with Johnson, (it was quite >>> obvious that the Dallas Police Chief had "first hand" knowledge of what >>> Johnson was conveying to Dallas Police long before the robot was engaged) >>> and yes, there was some attempt to get Johnson to surrender. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 12:40 PM, 'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I fail to see the difference in terms of morality between sending in 20 >>>> cops with machine guns (and risking some or all of them being blown up by >>>> a >>>> terrorist - which this guy WAS) vs. sending in a remote-controlled weapon >>>> to take him out. The decision-making would be the same - determining he >>>> was >>>> guilty without trial and needed to be killed. The only thing using a robot >>>> to do it with achieved was to preserve the lives of LEOs. How is that a >>>> dangerous thing? I applaud it, and only wish we had had similar capability >>>> to take out the terrorist in Orlando without harming innocents before he >>>> killed 49 of them. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sunday, July 10, 2016 at 12:09:31 PM UTC-4, MJ wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> July 9th, 2016 >>>>> >>>>> *A Drone Was Used to Blow up a US Citizen Without Trial Yesterday. Let >>>>> That Sink In *by hqanon >>>>> >>>>> * ( RPI >>>>> <http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/peace-and-prosperity/2016/july/08/in-dallas-drone-wars-just-came-home/>) >>>>> >>>>> *The Dallas shootings have ushered in a very new world for U.S. >>>>> citizens. For the very first time, a drone has been used on U.S. soil to >>>>> kill an American without trial or charges. >>>>> >>>>> The suspected shooter in yesterday’s tragic killings, U.S. Army >>>>> veteran Micah Xavier Johnson, was, according to police and press reports, >>>>> holed up in a parking garage and would not give himself up. After hours >>>>> of >>>>> what police claimed were fruitless negotiations with Johnson, a >>>>> weaponized >>>>> robot was sent >>>>> <http://undergroundreporter.org/killer-robot-dallas-human-rights/> to >>>>> where he was hiding and blown up, taking Johnson with it. >>>>> >>>>> Get past the horror of what Johnson was accused of doing and think >>>>> about that precedent for a moment. Is it not chilling? >>>>> >>>>> RPI regular contributor Peter Van Buren, a retired State Department >>>>> official who did a tour in Iraq, put a very fine point on the “robot” >>>>> bomb: >>>>> >>>>> [image: Emacs!] >>>>> >>>>> Indeed, even without wings, this was a drone sent in to kill an >>>>> American suspected of a crime. >>>>> >>>>> Police claim that continuing the negotiations was pointless and >>>>> attempting to capture him would have put officers at risk. He was >>>>> supposedly shooting. While no sane person wants police officers to be >>>>> killed, risk is something we are told they willingly accept when they >>>>> sign >>>>> up for police duty. There are plenty of low-risk jobs out there. >>>>> >>>>> The media and opinion-leaders are presenting us with a false choice: >>>>> if we question the use of drones to kill Americans even if we suspect >>>>> they have done very bad things we somehow do not care about the lives >>>>> of >>>>> police officers. That is not the case. It is perfectly possible to not >>>>> want >>>>> police officers to be killed in the line of duty but to wholeheartedly >>>>> reject the idea of authorities using drones to remotely kill Americans >>>>> before they are found guilty. >>>>> >>>>> African-American Dallas protester Mark Hughes was wrongly identified >>>>> <http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2016/07/08/3796589/dallas-misidentified-suspect/> >>>>> >>>>> by Dallas Police as a suspect in the shootings. Police tweeted photos of >>>>> Hughes marching with protesters openly carrying a rifle, as is permitted >>>>> in >>>>> Texas. Police claimed he was involved in the shooting. He was a suspect >>>>> just like Johnson was a suspect. During questioning they told Hughes >>>>> that they had video of him shooting people >>>>> <http://www.rawstory.com/2016/07/man-wrongly-idd-as-dallas-shooting-person-of-interest-says-cops-lied-to-him-during-interrogation/>, >>>>> >>>>> which was a lie. What if police had sent in a drone to take out Mark >>>>> Hughes? What will happen in the future to a future Mark Hughes, falsely >>>>> accused by police of being involved in a shooting? Will we come to accept >>>>> murder without trial? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://anonhq.com/drone-used-blow-us-citizen-without-trial-yesterday-let-sink-inrpi-dallas-shootings-ushered-new-world-u-s-citizens-first-time-drone/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> -- >>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>> >>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>> >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> >>> -- >> -- >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "PoliticalForum" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > >
-- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
