Watching the uniformed speculate over false narratives is always amusing!

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/01/04/walter-scott-shooting-case-update-officer-michael-slager-bonded-from-jail-judge-and-prosecutor-deny-speedy-trial/

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2015/04/12/game-changer-or-paradigm-shift-walter-scott-shooting-enhanced-video-shows-officer-slager-with-taser-darts/

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:34 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected]>
wrote:

> According to the FBI there were 27 murdered on the job in 2014 and 51
> (yes, FIFTY-ONE) murdered on the job in 2015.
> There have been at least 26 police officers killed on the job using guns
> so far this year. That means we will no doubt lose at least 50 by the end
> of the year
> ---
> so there must also have been a war on police last year also, right?
>
> there needs to be a war on policemen who shoot unarmed civilians in the
> back.
>
>
> On Saturday, July 9, 2016 at 9:21:12 PM UTC-5, Perplexed wrote:
>>
>>
>> The data cited in your article is quite outdated. Most of it only goes
>> through 2012 and this is 2016. The militant black movements didn't start
>> getting support from the mainstream media, NFL players, celebrities, and
>> every dumbass democrat in the House of Representatives until late 2014
>> after months of the "hands up don't shoot" bs lies they all pushed to the
>> mobs.
>>
>> According to the FBI there were 27 murdered on the job in 2014 and 51
>> (yes, FIFTY-ONE) murdered on the job in 2015.
>>
>> There have been at least 26 police officers killed on the job using guns
>> so far this year. That means we will no doubt lose at least 50 by the end
>> of the year even if it doesn't get any worse. That's more than TWICE - and
>> almost THREE TIMES the number of blacks who were killed by cops who weren't
>> doing something to warrant being killed.
>>
>> So what there isn't is a war or open season on black people. THAT is the
>> lie that needs to stop being told. There IS, however, an ALARMING increase
>> in the number of cops being shot by murderous thugs doing so based on the
>> PACK OF LIES being fed to them by disgusting democrats, a dishonest media,
>> and black activists.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, July 9, 2016 at 5:45:37 PM UTC-4, MJ wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Karen DeCoster
>>>
>>> *"Let Radley Balko's article shut up all of the hyperventilating
>>> diptards. Facts are more powerful than your state-worship and
>>> ignorance-based cliché recitals. " *September 10, 2015
>>>
>>> *Once again: There is no ‘war on cops.’ And those who claim otherwise
>>> are playing a dangerous game. *By Radley Balko
>>>
>>> Here’s Fox News earlier this week, shamelessly exploiting a tragedy to
>>> gin up outrage.
>>> http://youtu.be/x9uJHbXpMoU
>>>
>>>
>>> They certainly aren’t the only ones. Here are some more examples of
>>> media outlets and politicians spreading the hysteria:
>>>
>>>    - “War On Police Sparks National Crime Wave”
>>>    
>>> <http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/090315-769630-war-on-police-fuels-national-crime-wave.htm>
>>>    - “Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick: There’s A War On Cops And Media ‘Are Not In
>>>    Police Officers’ Corner'”
>>>    
>>> <http://keranews.org/post/lt-gov-dan-patrick-there-s-war-cops-and-media-are-not-police-officers-corner>
>>>    - “Police face recruiting shortage due to war on cops”
>>>    
>>> <http://nypost.com/2015/09/07/police-face-recruiting-shortage-due-to-war-on-cops/>
>>>    - “Do Cops’ Lives Matter to Obama?”
>>>    
>>> <http://www.creators.com/opinion/pat-buchanan/do-cops-lives-matter-to-obama.html>
>>>    - “[New York Police Chief] Bratton warns of tough times ahead due to
>>>    ‘war on cops'”
>>>    
>>> <http://nypost.com/2015/09/01/bratton-warns-tough-times-ahead-due-to-war-on-cops/>
>>>
>>>
>>> As I’ve noted here before, we’re seeing similar rhetoric from
>>> politicians, particularly from GOP presidential hopefuls, including Donald
>>> Trump
>>> <https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CB8QFjAAahUKEwiluonVntvHAhWMGj4KHVH4DEE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Fnews%2Fpost-politics%2Fwp%2F2015%2F08%2F29%2Ftrump-in-tennessee-downplays-police-brutality-promises-to-get-rid-of-gangs%2F&usg=AFQjCNGui_Bt4Y3H6WAqTfDAYsjwb6Xwbw&sig2=yxNyOcv5Baxu3zBZMH_cMA>,
>>> Ted Cruz
>>> <https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CB8QqQIwAGoVChMIutzS3p7bxwIVgnE-Ch1K6g2N&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.msnbc.com%2Frachel-maddow-show%2Fted-cruz-shows-how-not-respond-police-killings&usg=AFQjCNE4qkak84teylpnfVZ2njiLAsbBIg&sig2=Om0suqndg5UpN_fgSH_puw&bvm=bv.101800829,d.cWw>,
>>> and Scott Walker.
>>> <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-watch/wp/2015/09/03/scott-walker-couldnt-be-more-wrong-about-the-threat-to-police-officers/>
>>>
>>> All of this fact-free fearmongering is having an effect. A Rasmussen
>>> poll taken last week
>>> <http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/lifestyle/general_lifestyle/august_2015/58_think_there_s_a_war_on_police_in_america_today>found
>>> that 58 percent of respondents now believe there is now a “war on police.”
>>> Just 27 percent disagreed.
>>>
>>> So let’s go through the numbers. Again
>>> <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-watch/wp/2014/10/02/once-again-police-work-is-not-getting-more-dangerous/>.
>>> So far, 2015 is on pace to see 35 felonious killings of police officers. If
>>> that pace holds, this year would end with the second lowest number of
>>> murdered cops in decades. Here’s a graph depicting annual killings of cops
>>> with firearms from Mark A. Perry at the American Enterprise Institute:
>>> <https://www.aei.org/publication/is-there-really-a-war-on-cops-the-data-show-that-2015-will-likely-be-one-of-the-safest-years-in-history-for-police/>
>>> [image: PerryAEI]
>>>
>>> But these are just the raw numbers. If we look at the *rate* of
>>> killings of cops, the trend is more pronounced. There are two ways examine
>>> the rate of police killings. The first is to look at the rate of killings
>>> of cops per 100K cops on the street. This figure is somewhat difficult to
>>> calculate because there are widely varying estimates of how many cops are
>>> on the street. It depends on how you define “police officer,” who is doing
>>> the estimating, and various other factors. But if you use consistent
>>> sources, the number of police has generally gone up, while the number of
>>> officers killed has generally gone down. So your graph looks something like
>>> this one, from Dan Wang
>>> <http://danwang.co/statistics-on-police-fatalities/>:
>>> [image: FKPer100KCops]
>>>
>>> The other way you could measure the rate of killings of police officers
>>> is to look at the number with respect to the overall population. Here’s
>>> another graph from Perry that plots those figures:
>>> [image: police1]
>>>
>>> As you can see, by this measure 2015 is shaping up to be the second
>>> safest year for police *ever, *after 2013.
>>>
>>> Speaking of which, it’s important to note again here that 2013 was an
>>> abnormally and historically low year for police fatalities, as this graph
>>> from University of South Carolina law professor (and former police officer)
>>> Seth Stoughton shows.
>>>
>>> [Tweets @ link]
>>>
>>> So when police advocates say that 2014 saw an 80+ percent increase in
>>> homicides of cops over 2013, remember a few things: First, 2013 wasn’t just
>>> an all-time low, it was an all-time low by a significant margin. Second,
>>> the 2013 figure was so low that even a small increase will look large when
>>> expressed as a percentage. Third, the figure for the following year, 2014,
>>> (51 officers killed) was essentially consistent with the average for the
>>> previous five years (50 killed), and still lower than any five-year average
>>> going back to 1960. ( See this graph
>>> <http://i1.wp.com/danwang.co/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/average-police-fatalities-decade.png>,
>>> also from Wang.) Fourth, again, 2015 is on pace (35 killings) to be lower
>>> than any year but 2013. Another common response from police organizations
>>> and their advocates is that the reduction in fatalities is due to better
>>> medical care and improvements in protective gear such as bulletproof vests.
>>> Both things are undoubtedly true. But *assaults* on police officers are
>>> in decline as well. That is, not only are fewer people killing police
>>> officers, fewer people are trying to harm them. These graphs from Stoughton
>>> show the raw numbers of assaults on police:
>>> [image: AssaultGraph]
>>>
>>>
>>> [image: WeaponGraph]
>>>
>>> As you can see, at best you could argue that assaults on police with
>>> firearms are about even with where they’ve been for most of the last
>>> decade, save for a dip in 2009 and 2010. But these too are raw figures.
>>> When we look at the rate of assault on cops, from either the perspective of
>>> total cops or total population, the downward trend once again becomes more
>>> pronounced. From Daniel Bier
>>> <http://blog.skepticallibertarian.com/2014/08/21/methodological-notes-on-police-fatalities-and-assaults/>,
>>> here are two graphs looking at the assault *rates* on police officers.
>>> [image: 20150320_assaultandinjuryrates1]
>>>
>>> Any murder of a police officer is a tragedy. (As is any murder of a
>>> non-police officer.) But media outlets, politicians, and police advocates
>>> do real damage when they push this false narrative about a rising threat to
>>> law enforcement. First, this sort of propaganda weights the public debate
>>> and discourse. When there’s a fictional “war on cops” blaring in the
>>> background, it becomes much more difficult to have an honest discussion
>>> about police cameras, police militarization, use of lethal force policies,
>>> police discipline, police transparency
>>> <https://twitter.com/romenesko/status/639220767553626112>, training,
>>> police accountability, and a host of other issues. Of course, that’s
>>> precisely the point.
>>>
>>> But there’s also a much more pernicious effect of exaggerating the
>>> threats faced by law enforcement. When cops are constantly told that
>>> they’re under constant fire, or that every interaction with a citizen could
>>> be their last, or that they’re fortunate each time they come home from the
>>> job in one piece, it’s absolute poison for police-community relations. That
>>> kind of reminder on a regular basis would put *anyone* on edge. We’re
>>> putting police officers in a perpetually combative mindset that
>>> psychologically isolates them from the communities they serve. Incessantly
>>> telling cops that they’re under fire can condition them to see the people
>>> with whom they interact not as citizens with rights, but as potential
>>> threats. That not only means more animosity, anger and confrontation, it
>>> can also be a barrier to building relationships with people in the
>>> community ­ the sorts of relationships that help police officers solve
>>> crimes and keep communities safe.
>>>
>>> It also just makes for a miserable work life. If you’ve been trained to
>>> think your job is getting progressively more dangerous, and that a
>>> significant percentage of the people you encounter on a daily basis want to
>>> do you harm, you’re going to be less tolerant of dissent. You’re going to
>>> constantly be on-guard, on-edge, and jumpy. That isn’t a state of mind
>>> that’s conducive to de-escalation, that opts for persuasion over brute
>>> force, or seeks out peaceful conflict resolution. It’s a state of mind
>>> ruled by the limbic system, not the frontal lobe. And yes, it’s a state of
>>> mind that makes an officer more likely to reach for his gun
>>> <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-watch/wp/2014/09/26/a-sort-of-defense-of-south-carolina-state-trooper-sean-groubert/>.
>>> Again, this isn’t a comment on cops. It’s a comment on human beings in
>>> general.
>>>
>>> An over-emphasis on and obsession with a “war on cops” would be
>>> dangerous and counterproductive even if it were true. But by every
>>> imaginable measure, it *just isn’t true*. When this false narrative
>>> comes from police organizations and their supporters, it’s at least
>>> somewhat understandable. When it comes from politicians, it’s grandstanding
>>> and demagoguery. When it comes from media organizations, it’s journalistic
>>> malpractice. And it’s almost certainly getting people killed.
>>>
>>> One last point: I’ve seen some police officials and their advocates
>>> respond to these statistics by pointing out that even if assaults and
>>> killings of cops are down, anti-police *rhetoric* is increasing.
>>> Therefore, they say, they’re justified in proclaiming that there’s a war on
>>> the police. This is nonsense. Police agencies are government agencies.
>>> They’re government agencies in whom we entrust the power to detain, arrest,
>>> and kill. Yes, it’s true that some people are demanding more of those
>>> agencies. It’s true that personal technology is enabling people to create
>>> an independent video narrative of their interactions with police. It’s true
>>> that those videos have sometimes revealed police misconduct and brutality,
>>> and that police officers, like all people, sometimes mis-remember,
>>> misstate, and outright lie when recounting contentious, traumatic,
>>> high-stakes incidents. And it’s true that because of all of this, the
>>> public as a whole today finds police officers as a whole less
>>> trustworthy than in the past
>>> <http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/aug/26/public-trust-police-low-poll-finds/>.
>>> It’s also true that some activists, pundits, and politicians are demanding
>>> more accountability, transparency, and training for police.
>>>
>>> None of these things are indicative of a “war.” On the contrary, all of
>>> this new skepticism, criticism, forced transparency, and mistrust of the
>>> police is ­ again ­ coming even as violence against police officers is
>>> reaching historic lows. This is how a democracy is supposed to work. It’s
>>> something worth celebrating.
>>>
>>> Instead, police groups and their advocates are claiming that the mere
>>> act of criticizing a government entity is akin to declaring war on it, and
>>> that therefore, police critics are culpable every time a police officer is
>>> murdered. (And given the way they ignore and abuse statistics, those
>>> critics are also apparently culpable for a lot of murders that never
>>> happened.) They’re essentially saying that exercising constitutional rights
>>> and participating in democracy are in and of themselves acts of violence.
>>> And in many cases, this is coming from the very people that the government
>>> empowers to use actual violence.
>>>
>>> *That* is something worth worrying about.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-watch/wp/2015/09/10/once-again-there-is-no-war-on-cops-and-those-who-claim-otherwise-are-playing-a-dangerous-game/
>>>
>> --
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to