You evidently lost some civility along with that job, warp ten. I have had quite enough of people who rely on shoulds- it is arrogant and intrusive. I happen to like my abstract thoughts and intend to keep thinking them.
On Nov 5, 7:18�pm, WarpTen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That wasn't the point which obviously was over your head. You and gaar > should reread and try to block your mental abstractions long enough to > get the meaning of what is being presented in someone's post. > > On Nov 5, 4:53�pm, rigsy03 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > The Government isn't a god, either. It can't deal with the weather or > > fires or food safety or stop crime, etc. > > > On Nov 5, 4:46 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The Government isn't my Wife... > > > > I expect things of myself, and my Wife, that I don't expect from the > > > Government. > > > > On Nov 5, 2:17 pm, WarpTen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > It is the government's responsibility, after taking our money, to > > > > establish a stable economy for all people, not just those who are in > > > > business, or special interest groups. People should be able to find > > > > employment sufficient enough to provide the basic necessities for the > > > > family. When budget cuts forced school closings around the country, > > > > decent hard working people found themselves out of work and unable to > > > > pay their bills. This is not lazy looking for a handout people, but > > > > people who take pride in working for a living. Who is responsible for > > > > economic shortfalls? The politician who claim they are going to fix > > > > it all up and make everything good. Reality? Year after year it gets > > > > worse while the financial portfolios grow larger for those at the top > > > > of the food chain. This recent bail out is a perfect example as the > > > > people get shafted with 800 billion in debt so irresponsible > > > > executives can walk away with millions of dollars in their pockets. > > > > What is wrong with the picture? You tell me! > > > > > If you turned over your paycheck every week to your wife with the > > > > belief that she was going to take care of all the bills and provide > > > > all the provisions necessary for the home only to find one day that > > > > some of the services are getting turned off because she decided one > > > > day to go on a shopping spree, what would you do? Nothing? Suck it up > > > > and hope that she gets it better next month? Listen to others that > > > > say they will take your pay check and make it work for you and then > > > > dig you deeper in the muck? It's time to put an end to irresponsible > > > > government, period. Take a good look back just recently and see how > > > > Bush and Chaney really helped us all out. > > > > > On Nov 5, 8:29 am, Kamakazee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > "The fact is > > > > > there are more people homeless now due to the foreclosure crisis > > > > > brought on by bad government policies. People "are" lacking shelter > > > > > in > > > > > the US, stop deluding yourself. Thousands of children go to bed > > > > > without dinner every night and thousands more are nutritionally > > > > > deficient." > > > > > > I don't dispute the above; I dispute whose fault it is. Are you > > > > > claiming it's the govt's responsibility to see that children got to be > > > > > each night only after they've had dinner? That their meals are > > > > > nutritionally sufficient? > > > > > > Already many schools, including those here in Dallas, have programs > > > > > pursuant to which kids are sent home on Fridays with backpacks full of > > > > > food for the weekend. So they can be ensured of having decent meals. > > > > > Is this the govt's duty? Apparently it's becoming so (though many of > > > > > these programs are funded by private charities). Is this creating any > > > > > responsibility or independence on the part of the parents? I would > > > > > argue the exact opposite, more than likely it's giving them the > > > > > opportunity to spend their money on things other then nutritionally > > > > > sufficient meals. > > > > > > On Nov 5, 8:15 am, WarpTen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Your the one that needs to get out of the basement and possibly even > > > > > > out of the closet. I'm approaching 60 years old and have a better > > > > > > grasp as to the reality of poverty in the US than you can imagine. > > > > > > I've seen this country rise and fall throughout the years and can > > > > > > see > > > > > > what government or the lack thereof can do to the economy. The fact > > > > > > is > > > > > > there are more people homeless now due to the foreclosure crisis > > > > > > brought on by bad government policies. People "are" lacking shelter > > > > > > in > > > > > > the US, stop deluding yourself. Thousands of children go to bed > > > > > > without dinner every night and thousands more are nutritionally > > > > > > deficient. Check any poverty stats for a eye opener and get a > > > > > > reality > > > > > > check! Even Bush recognized these poverty issues! > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 7:14 am, Kamakazee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > "People just want the basics not luxury and not handouts. Every > > > > > > > person > > > > > > > should have food and shelter. Is that too much to ask? " > > > > > > > Every person can have "food and shelter" in the US. Those that > > > > > > > physically can't work for it are provided for by the govt. Those > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > can work for it should, and if they work hard enough, they might > > > > > > > even > > > > > > > get the "luxury" you reference above. > > > > > > > > Get out of your parents' basement for a few hours and look > > > > > > > around. No > > > > > > > one is starving in the US. No one is lacking shelter in the US. > > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 6:23 am, WarpTen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > The money comes from the people dummy! The problem is that after > > > > > > > > giving away most of their money to the government and the rest > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > business (so that CEO's can earn Millions) there is nothing > > > > > > > > left and > > > > > > > > then of course they are wondering where they are going to get > > > > > > > > money to > > > > > > > > feed their children. You are a capitalistic pig Kay! > > > > > > > > > People just want the basics not luxury and not handouts. Every > > > > > > > > person > > > > > > > > should have food and shelter. Is that too much to ask? > > > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 12:36 am, Kay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Oh, people voting for him just don't care - - they do not > > > > > > > > > understand > > > > > > > > > how business works and what makes this country run. > > > > > > > > > > What they care about is handouts for themselves and no > > > > > > > > > thought of > > > > > > > > > where the money will come from. > > > > > > > > > > I heard a woman on the radio a couple of days ago saying she > > > > > > > > > is voting > > > > > > > > > for Obama "cause then I doan need to warry bout how I will > > > > > > > > > fill up my > > > > > > > > > gas tank, I woan need to warry bout how I'm gonna pay my > > > > > > > > > bills, I woan > > > > > > > > > warry bout losin' my job cause Barack he gonna take care of > > > > > > > > > me." > > > > > > > > > > Soooooo..........that's just great, ain't it?- Hide quoted > > > > > > > > > text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
