On Nov 5, 5:43 pm, WarpTen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is obvious that you didn't really take the time to research poverty > but as a convenience to accommodate yourself you merely did a copy and > paste on the first thing you could find. Obviously you didn't take > the time to see that the article you offered is dated at the beginning > of 2004 which is representative of previous years accumulated data. > This is typical of the type of posts you present in this forum, weak > and outdated.
Obviously YOU didn't READ that this is the second of such Reports, and the numbers only went UP for the Poor during the near Decade between the two... I offer you FACTS to support my position... You have offered nothing but your opinion, stated as fact. Imagine that. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
