"Fool us once shame on you; Fool us twice shame on us; Fool us thrice you must be the Bush Administration. "
I think you're just generally a fool, regardless of the administration. Does this help? On Nov 7, 10:28 am, WarpTen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The "FACTS" are on Every News Station in Every City across the > Nation. They are Not My Facts, nor are they made up facts. > > This administration is no better than any of the Enron executives. > When Bush and Chaney come under Federal Investigation for their > crooked dealings and their lies, the world will see why we have > Spiraled Down the Abyss of Economic Disaster over the Past Eight > Years. > > Look what they left us with! > > They are leaving office and leaving all the garbage behind for > everyone else to clean up. > > The only thing they are taking with them is the millions they > accumulated through there unified corruption and egregious lies to the > American People and the World. > > FACT>> Iraq oil revenues are booming and they have a huge surplus > going on while the USA continues investing Billions in the rebuilding > of Iraq and our homeland is facing a massive budget deficit that is > historical. > What do you think is behind this Skewed Logic? and Who do you think > has something to gain from it? > > Do the names Bush, Chaney, Halliburton and anyone else associated with > Big Oil ring a bell? > > Fool us once shame on you; Fool us twice shame on us; Fool us thrice > you must be the Bush Administration. > > On Nov 6, 1:36 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Understood... > > > Why worry about facts when you can make up your own shit. > > > I call those Dan Rather Facts, for obvious reasons. > > > You seem to call it "Truth". > > > On Nov 6, 11:14 am, WarpTen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > To hell with them stats. It is the talk of the town about how many > > > people are suffering right now in this county. Wake up and quit > > > denying the truth!! Your just wasting time with all your bullshit > > > facts. > > > > On Nov 6, 9:42 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Nov 5, 5:43 pm, WarpTen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > It is obvious that you didn't really take the time to research poverty > > > > > but as a convenience to accommodate yourself you merely did a copy and > > > > > paste on the first thing you could find. Obviously you didn't take > > > > > the time to see that the article you offered is dated at the beginning > > > > > of 2004 which is representative of previous years accumulated data. > > > > > This is typical of the type of posts you present in this forum, weak > > > > > and outdated. > > > > > Obviously YOU didn't READ that this is the second of such Reports, and > > > > the numbers only went UP for the Poor during the near Decade between > > > > the two... > > > > > I offer you FACTS to support my position... > > > > > You have offered nothing but your opinion, stated as fact. > > > > > Imagine that.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
