So what is your opinion of these 50 republicans? Because I can sure 
remember a time when you expressed seething hatred of warmongers. Are you 
now warmly embracing them because they hate Trump as much as you do?

Personally I think this helps Trump. Most Americans agree that invading 
Iraq was a huge mistake and it was these blithering idiots who advised Bush 
it was the right thing to do.

On Tuesday, August 9, 2016 at 1:09:52 PM UTC-4, plainolamerican wrote:
>
>
> https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/group-of-50-former-gop-national-security-officials-trump-would-be-most-reckless-president-in-american-history/2016/08/08/6715042c-5d9f-11e6-af8e-54aa2e849447_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_trumpletter-430pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory
>
> A group of 50 former national security officials, all of whom have served 
> Republican presidents from Richard M. Nixon to George W. Bush, have signed 
> an open letter calling Donald Trump unqualified to be president and warning 
> that, if elected, “he would be the most reckless President in American 
> history.”
>
> The letter offers a withering critique of the GOP nominee, saying he 
> “lacks the character, values and experience” to be president. The 
> signatories declare their conviction that he would be dangerous “and would 
> put at risk our country’s national security and well-being.”
>
> They state flatly that none of them intend to vote for Trump in November. 
> Some have decided to vote for Hillary Clinton, while others intend to sit 
> out the election or write in another name, said John Bellinger III, a 
> former legal adviser to Condoleezza Rice and the writer of the letter’s 
> first draft.
>
> “We also know that many have doubts about Hillary Clinton, as do many of 
> us,” the letter says. “But Donald Trump is not the answer to America’s 
> daunting challenges and to this crucial election. We are convinced that in 
> the Oval Office, he would be the most reckless President in American 
> history.”
>
> In a statement, Trump said the letter writers share the blame for “making 
> the world such a dangerous place.”
>
> “They are nothing more than the failed Washington elite looking to hold 
> onto their power, and it’s time they are held accountable for their 
> actions,” he said.
>
> Trump said the former officials — along with Clinton — took part in the 
> decisions that led to the invasion of Iraq, the deaths of Americans in 
> Benghazi, Libya, and the rise of the Islamic State.
>
> “Yet despite these failures, they think they are entitled to use their 
> favor trading to land taxpayer-funded government contracts and speaking 
> fees,” he said.
>
> Although no former secretaries of state signed the letter, it carries the 
> signatures of Michael Chertoff and Tom Ridge, former secretaries of 
> homeland security; Michael Hayden, a former director of the CIA and the 
> National Security Agency; John Negroponte, a former director of national 
> intelligence and deputy secretary of state; Robert Zoellick, who also was a 
> deputy secretary of state and president of the World Bank and the U.S. 
> trade representative under George W. Bush; Carla Hills, the U.S. trade 
> representative under George H.W. Bush; and William H. Taft IV, a former 
> deputy secretary of defense and ambassador to NATO under the elder Bush.
>
> Also signing the letter were several aides who were senior advisers in the 
> White House, State Department and Pentagon. Among them were Eric Edelman, a 
> national security adviser to then-Vice President Richard B. Cheney, and 
> Bellinger, who worked closely with Rice when she was secretary of state and 
> when she was on the NSC.
>
> Bellinger said that some involved with the letter wanted to wait until 
> September to release their views but that the candidate’s behavior in 
> recent weeks — from his comments on NATO to inviting Russian intelligence 
> to hack Clinton’s emails — galvanized them to move sooner.
>
> “This is not about NATO, it’s not about trade, it’s not about Russia, it’s 
> not about cyber. We really wanted to focus on the character, temperament 
> and judgment that we have seen are required of good presidents,” Bellinger 
> said.
>
> Although the signatories all served Republican presidents, many of the 
> criticisms echo those being leveled by the Clinton campaign.
>
> “He appears to lack basic knowledge about and belief in the U.S. 
> Constitution, U.S. laws and U.S. institutions, including religious 
> tolerance, freedom of the press and an independent judiciary,” the letter 
> says of Trump.
>
> Later on, it adds, “At the same time, he persistently compliments our 
> adversaries and threatens our allies and friends. Unlike previous 
> Presidents who had limited experience in foreign affairs, Mr. Trump has 
> shown no interest in educating himself. He continues to display an alarming 
> ignorance of basic facts of contemporary international politics.”
>
> The letter said Trump “lacks the temperament to be President,” and gave a 
> scathing assessment of his ability to take advice, discipline himself, 
> control his emotions and reflect before acting.
>
> “He is unable or unwilling to separate truth from falsehood,” the letter 
> states in a particularly pointed criticism of Trump’s personal traits. “He 
> does not encourage conflicting views. He lacks self-control and acts 
> impetuously. He cannot tolerate personal criticism. He has alarmed our 
> closest allies with his erratic behavior. All of these are dangerous 
> qualities in an individual who aspires to be President and 
> Commander-in-Chief, with command of the U.S. nuclear arsenal.”
>
> Bellinger said the letter is not intended to be political.
>
> “What we really wanted to do was to raise the alarm and awareness among 
> voters who may find Mr. Trump attractive in a lot of ways, but do not 
> understand what is required to be president of the United States,” he said. 
> “We are trying to say to them, we have served inside the White House, we 
> have worked with presidents for decades, we know what’s required to be 
> president, and we are deeply concerned Donald Trump does not have these 
> qualifications, the judgment or the temperament.”
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to