in the DC congressionally approved statute they have separate definitions.
I never said sodomy was not sex.
he lied if you allow that by statute sodomy is sex. in DC ........not. This
is why the prosecuter phrased that question that way.... "For the purposes
of this hearing............" and went on to give definitions "For the
purposes of this hearing..."
By DC statute (which to my knowledge has not been changed) he told the
"legal" truth. (extreme hair splitting)
with the prosecutors "NEW" definitions for the hearing.... he lied. But
those definitions would NOT stand later if brought to civil trial.
They knew which question to ask and which term to use and did not..........
or do you prefer to think they hadn't read the statute??
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 5:16 PM, KeithInTampa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So Mark, sodomy is not sex?
>
> He lied, to a grand jury, and to the special investigator, and he got
> away with it, something that numerous Americans have been imprisoned
> for. Have you read the statute? He lied.
>
>
>
> On Nov 8, 5:52 pm, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > what lie??? read the DC statute as to what constitutes sex. then read the
> DC
> > statute as to what constitutes sodomy. Under the statute he told the
> truth
> > (he did not have sex, he did commit sodomy), under the "special"
> > term/definition invented just for his questioning (never used before OR
> > after his inquisition) the special council tried to trick slick willy
> into
> > answering the charge...... he stuck with statute and got off (again).
> Smart
> > man.
> >
> > Had they asked him about SODOMY and he lied (said no) it would have been
> al
> > over for him. They knew that, he knew that, people like you do not know
> that
> > because they don't do their homework.
> >
> > It was a GAME!!!!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 4:41 PM, rigsy03 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > You are kidding. A guy who perfected the lie?
> >
> > > On Nov 8, 2:10 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Bill would make a great justice.
> >
> > > > On Nov 8, 1:50 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > Ramakazee,
> >
> > > > > Better check first to see if they have a football team.
> >
> > > > > On Nov 8, 1:39 pm, Kamakazee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > Ireland here I come if that happens...
> >
> > > > > > On Nov 8, 10:52 am, Travis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > Even worse: both of them on court.
> >
> > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Kamakazee <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > She was a valient lil trooper the last few weeks, working her
> > > chubby
> > > > > > > > hips almost to the bone campaigning in FL and OH (both of
> which
> > > Obama
> > > > > > > > won).
> >
> > > > > > > > Now the question becomes, what goodies does she get?
> >
> > > > > > > > I dunno, but it's gonna be good I thinik.
> >
> > > > > > > > Watch. Wait. See.
> >
> > > > > > > > PS. Worst case scenario: Hillbilly Bill on the USSC.
> >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > *~@):~{>- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > --
> > Mark M. Kahle
> > Blessed are the bewildered for they don't know the difference.... Me-
> Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
> >
>
--
Mark M. Kahle
Blessed are the bewildered for they don't know the difference.... Me
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
