Pitt. Pitt. Pitt. Let's use plain old common sense here. Flynn was head of military intelligence, and by most accounts the best at it in Obama's administration. Obama didn't like Flynn telling him he was wrong on ISIS, so he fired him.
So he KNEW that every single phone conversation he had with a foreign government was being monitored. There is no way in hell he said anything worthy of all of this shit that happened. As for the monitoring of the Russians b/c of the Podesta and DNC stuff, do you honestly think that if they'd have heard ANYTHING WHATSOEVER from ANYONE associated with Trump that THAT is what would have been illegally leaked to the WaPo? OF COURSE THEY'D HAVE LEAKED IT. THEY'D HAVE LEAKED IT THE MINUTE THEY HEARD IT BEFORE THE ELECTION! There is just one problem though. OBVIOUSLY it never happened, because it was never leaked, and nobody was ever indicted. On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:40:01 PM UTC-5, Pittalum wrote: > > Not exactly. > > It appears that we were aware of some Russian cyberactivities targeting > mostly Democratic political organizations occurring at the same time phone > conversations were frequent between Flynn and Manafort and some routinely > monitored Russians - and all in the home stretch of a presidential election. > > I got no problem looking a bit further into it. I say, release the > transcripts. > > What do you say? > > On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:18:42 PM UTC-5, btdt100 wrote: >> >> To clarify the context you are describing, you are saying that the leaked >> information from the NSA/CIA was obtained when the NSA/CIA was >> investigating leaked information? >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 10:32:18 AM UTC-6, Pittalum wrote: >>> >>> Just so we have some basic context to what's being looked at: >>> >>> "Both the frequency of the communications during early summer and the >>> proximity to Trump of those involved "raised a red flag" with US >>> intelligence and law enforcement, according to these officials. The >>> communications were intercepted during routine intelligence collection >>> targeting Russian officials and other Russian nationals known to US >>> intelligence. >>> >>> The extensive contacts drew concerns of US intelligence and law >>> enforcement officials in part because it came at a time of Russian >>> cyberactivities targeting mostly Democratic Party political >>> organizations >>> <http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/07/politics/us-blames-russia-for-targeting-election-systems/> >>> ." >>> >>> >>> http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/14/politics/donald-trump-aides-russians-campaign/index.html >>> >>> It's not like your boys Flynn and Manafort were being closely monitored >>> or anything like that. They were busted talking, and frequently at that, to >>> people that WERE being monitored. >>> >>> I can only imagine the *convulsions* cons would be *contorting* themselves >>> into had this been Hillary's aides talking to (insert your favorite >>> intelligence agency)' monitored Russians while said Russians were bugging >>> and releasing damaging information from Republican political organizations!! >>> >>> >>> On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 10:04:01 AM UTC-5, OhioMark wrote: >>>> >>>> We know his people were behind this. They illegally recorded a >>>> citizen's conversations, then illegally released these illegal recordings >>>> to the press. >>>> These traitors need to be hunted down, prosecuted and tossed in a deep >>>> dark hole. >>> >>> -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
