They have the transcripts, check out the NPR thread. Nothing to see here, but as always, the damage was done.
On Thursday, February 16, 2017 at 9:27:22 AM UTC-6, Pittalum wrote: > I suspect we're never going to really know what was said or not said on > those calls. Evidently, whatever was said was questionable enough that > Flynn felt the need to mislead other officials about it. I'm all for > dropping this case right now, after sleeping on it. This Trump thing is > starting to get a bit out of control, and it's making me nervous. > > In any case, I never really liked Flynn all that much - from what I've > heard about him. He reminded me a little too much of the Perle's and > Wolfie's that populated the W admin, except with an Iran obsession instead > of Iraq. And we all know how that turned out... > > > http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/flynn-and-the-dangerous-iran-obsession/ > > > On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 5:52:19 PM UTC-5, Perplexed wrote: >> >> >> Pitt. Pitt. Pitt. >> >> Let's use plain old common sense here. Flynn was head of military >> intelligence, and by most accounts the best at it in Obama's >> administration. Obama didn't like Flynn telling him he was wrong on ISIS, >> so he fired him. >> >> So he KNEW that every single phone conversation he had with a foreign >> government was being monitored. There is no way in hell he said anything >> worthy of all of this shit that happened. >> >> As for the monitoring of the Russians b/c of the Podesta and DNC stuff, >> do you honestly think that if they'd have heard ANYTHING WHATSOEVER from >> ANYONE associated with Trump that THAT is what would have been illegally >> leaked to the WaPo? OF COURSE THEY'D HAVE LEAKED IT. THEY'D HAVE LEAKED IT >> THE MINUTE THEY HEARD IT BEFORE THE ELECTION! There is just one problem >> though. OBVIOUSLY it never happened, because it was never leaked, and >> nobody was ever indicted. >> >> On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:40:01 PM UTC-5, Pittalum wrote: >>> >>> Not exactly. >>> >>> It appears that we were aware of some Russian cyberactivities targeting >>> mostly Democratic political organizations occurring at the same time phone >>> conversations were frequent between Flynn and Manafort and some routinely >>> monitored Russians - and all in the home stretch of a presidential election. >>> >>> I got no problem looking a bit further into it. I say, release the >>> transcripts. >>> >>> What do you say? >>> >>> On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 2:18:42 PM UTC-5, btdt100 wrote: >>>> >>>> To clarify the context you are describing, you are saying that the >>>> leaked information from the NSA/CIA was obtained when the NSA/CIA was >>>> investigating leaked information? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 10:32:18 AM UTC-6, Pittalum wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Just so we have some basic context to what's being looked at: >>>>> >>>>> "Both the frequency of the communications during early summer and the >>>>> proximity to Trump of those involved "raised a red flag" with US >>>>> intelligence and law enforcement, according to these officials. The >>>>> communications were intercepted during routine intelligence collection >>>>> targeting Russian officials and other Russian nationals known to US >>>>> intelligence. >>>>> >>>>> The extensive contacts drew concerns of US intelligence and law >>>>> enforcement officials in part because it came at a time of Russian >>>>> cyberactivities targeting mostly Democratic Party political >>>>> organizations >>>>> <http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/07/politics/us-blames-russia-for-targeting-election-systems/> >>>>> ." >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/14/politics/donald-trump-aides-russians-campaign/index.html >>>>> >>>>> It's not like your boys Flynn and Manafort were being closely >>>>> monitored or anything like that. They were busted talking, and frequently >>>>> at that, to people that WERE being monitored. >>>>> >>>>> I can only imagine the *convulsions* cons would be *contorting* >>>>> themselves >>>>> into had this been Hillary's aides talking to (insert your favorite >>>>> intelligence agency)' monitored Russians while said Russians were bugging >>>>> and releasing damaging information from Republican political >>>>> organizations!! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 10:04:01 AM UTC-5, OhioMark wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> We know his people were behind this. They illegally recorded a >>>>>> citizen's conversations, then illegally released these illegal >>>>>> recordings >>>>>> to the press. >>>>>> These traitors need to be hunted down, prosecuted and tossed in a >>>>>> deep dark hole. >>>>> >>>>> -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
