Already one third of the first $125billion of taxpayer's bailout funds went straight into the pockets of Wall St Parasites and you are vilifying the victims of the criminal greed of the ruling elites. Can you be more of a mindless sychophant? Can't be capitalism gone wrong, can't be the government that fucked up--I know its those with disabilities and no jobs that fucked up the country. Lets get em
On Nov 12, 6:43 am, "\"Lone Wolf\"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This argument is pathetic, as if its it those on social security that > a drain on society. The poorest 40% of Americans own 0.2% of total > wealth, they are really living it up on social security. Have you ever > had to live on social security--you can't. It is a miserable existence > where payments are way under poverty line. > > The rich have ALL the money, the top 10% have 90% of the wealth. It is > the workers that can no longer support the rich working long hours for > slave wages, having to live of credit cards. > > You lot are sick in the head. You are even more of an idiot if you > think Obama is going to change anything. > > On Nov 12, 4:37 am, jgg1000a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > a) an FDR envisioned self funded retirement annutiy? > > > b) a political handout used by Democrats and Republicans to buy votes > > > c) a non sustainable public retirement system that relied on a high > > worker/retiree ratio to work, > > > d) A welfare program that the poor should be refunded all payroll > > constitutions but receive all benefits, > > > e) a retirement system that will require current taxes to pay benefits > > within 10 years?, or > > > f) all the above > > > Is FICA tax an Income tax as many Democrats insist? Or is it funding > > for a self-funding retirement account? How you answer this question > > determines how you view a FTP like "privatized" Social Security > > system... It seems Obama sees Social Security as a public pension > > that should be paid for by the rich... > > >http://www.usnews.com/blogs/capital-commerce/2008/11/10/is-obama-plan... > > > >>> Now this: My guy Dan Clifton, superanalyst at Strategas Research, has > > >>> noticed that Speaker Pelosi is pushing for a permanent refundable tax > > >>> credit on payroll taxes paid. Clifton thinks that tax credit could be > > >>> paid for by a five percent surtax on higher income taxpayers. "While > > >>> this achieves the same goal of raising the top tax rate, to achieve the > > >>> permanent middle class tax cut, the 5 pct. surtax will fall on top of > > >>> the higher income tax rates after the Bush tax cuts expire (39.6% + > > >>> 5%)."- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
