It is clear you know little about the Social Security issue... On Nov 11, 3:06 pm, "\"Lone Wolf\"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Already one third of the first $125billion of taxpayer's bailout funds > went straight into the pockets of Wall St Parasites and you are > vilifying the victims of the criminal greed of the ruling elites. Can > you be more of a mindless sychophant? Can't be capitalism gone wrong, > can't be the government that fucked up--I know its those with > disabilities and no jobs that fucked up the country. Lets get em > > On Nov 12, 6:43 am, "\"Lone Wolf\"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This argument is pathetic, as if its it those on social security that > > a drain on society. The poorest 40% of Americans own 0.2% of total > > wealth, they are really living it up on social security. Have you ever > > had to live on social security--you can't. It is a miserable existence > > where payments are way under poverty line. > > > The rich have ALL the money, the top 10% have 90% of the wealth. It is > > the workers that can no longer support the rich working long hours for > > slave wages, having to live of credit cards. > > > You lot are sick in the head. You are even more of an idiot if you > > think Obama is going to change anything. > > > On Nov 12, 4:37 am, jgg1000a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > a) an FDR envisioned self funded retirement annutiy? > > > > b) a political handout used by Democrats and Republicans to buy votes > > > > c) a non sustainable public retirement system that relied on a high > > > worker/retiree ratio to work, > > > > d) A welfare program that the poor should be refunded all payroll > > > constitutions but receive all benefits, > > > > e) a retirement system that will require current taxes to pay benefits > > > within 10 years?, or > > > > f) all the above > > > > Is FICA tax an Income tax as many Democrats insist? Or is it funding > > > for a self-funding retirement account? How you answer this question > > > determines how you view a FTP like "privatized" Social Security > > > system... It seems Obama sees Social Security as a public pension > > > that should be paid for by the rich... > > > >http://www.usnews.com/blogs/capital-commerce/2008/11/10/is-obama-plan... > > > > >>> Now this: My guy Dan Clifton, superanalyst at Strategas Research, has > > > >>> noticed that Speaker Pelosi is pushing for a permanent refundable tax > > > >>> credit on payroll taxes paid. Clifton thinks that tax credit could be > > > >>> paid for by a five percent surtax on higher income taxpayers. "While > > > >>> this achieves the same goal of raising the top tax rate, to achieve > > > >>> the permanent middle class tax cut, the 5 pct. surtax will fall on > > > >>> top of the higher income tax rates after the Bush tax cuts expire > > > >>> (39.6% + 5%)."- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
