how many times must i answer the same quetion from you sunshine ? [ i was going to ask if you were really that foolish and uniformed but i already know you are . so look up who owns all of those newspapers and TV stations you constantly whine about . i can hardly wait to hear the crying and wailing when talk radio has to provide equal access to all ]
On Nov 16, 8:45 am, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > you keep dodging the question, murkey. either shit or get off the > pot. why is the unfairness doctrine aimed at only at conservative > talk radio, and not at the liberal dominated press? can't answer it > can ya. don't hurt yourself dancing and dodging. feel free to email > the dnc for an answer, we can wait. > > On Nov 16, 8:22 am, "mike [move on] 532" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > i was going to ask if you were really that foolish and uniformed but i > > already know you are . so look up who owns all of those newspapers and > > TV stations you constantly whine about . i can hardly wait to hear the > > crying and wailing when talk radio has to provide equal access to all > > > On Nov 16, 7:52 am, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > no murkey, free speech has been denied in the dominate liberal msm. > > > newspapers, tv news, most all cable shows, hollywood, and on and on. > > > and isn't it ironic that none of these bastions of liberal crap are > > > not included in the censorship doctrine. only the one area that is > > > dominated by conservatives. why is that murky? why? > > > > On Nov 16, 3:22 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > How is Free Speech being denied? > > > > > You have Liberal Talk Radio, just as we have Conservative. > > > > > Not our fault your Liberal Talk Radio isn't successful and > > > > Conservative Radio is. > > > > > On Nov 15, 11:56 pm, "mike [move on] 532" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > go get your mommy and have her read this to you . the answer to where > > > > > free speech has been denied is on the talk radio programs . > > > > > > On Nov 15, 11:09 am, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > come on murky, you have not provided one instance where free speech > > > > > > has been repressed. since there is none, why would there be a need > > > > > > for the censorship doctrine? why ? > > > > > > > On Nov 15, 10:10 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Nov 14, 11:23 pm, "mike [move on] 532" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > on the public's air waves of course ! haven't you been paying > > > > > > > > attention ? > > > > > > > > Just because no one wants to listen to your Loony Liberal tripe > > > > > > > doesn't mean there isn't Free Speech... > > > > > > > > It just means no one wants to listen to your Loony Liberal > > > > > > > tripe.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
