on the public's air waves of course ! haven't you been paying attention ?
On Nov 14, 5:49 pm, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > come on murky, where is free speech being denied today where the > unfairness doctrine is needed? now if the dems manage to initiate > this censorship, then we will truly have the lack of free speech, but > right now, at this moment in time, murky, where is there a lack of > free speech? where? > > On Nov 14, 3:23 pm, "Keith In Tampa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Nov 13, 2:30 am, "mike [Chief Moonbat] 532" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: great i am glad to see you are finally coming on board the free > > speech for all express ! > > > ======== > > Here is but one example, but a good example, of why you are a > > Moonbat......You cannot see the truth, even when it is laid out before you, > > and why I have that rule, not to even get sucked into responding to any of > > your ridiculous, ludicrous tripe. It is a waste of time to engage you in > > any kind of meaningful dialogue. > > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Keith In Tampa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > > On Nov 11, 8:32 am, "mike [Chief Moonbat] 532" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > fish boy it has never been considered unconstitutional and that is the > > > fact > > > of the mater > > > > ==== > > > > The Constitutionality of the Fairness Doctrine was brought into question > > > on > > > numerous occasions not only before the Supreme Court, as Gaar just > > > demonstrated, but in numerous federal District and Circuit Courts. That > > > is > > > one of the reasons for the Fairness Doctrine's demise over twenty years > > > ago. > > > > Today, with the way that the mainstream media has become so partisan, (and > > > that is a fact, even the Washington Post as well as the New York Times, > > > NBC > > > and CBS have all recently, like this week, admitted to this fact) the > > > Fairness Doctrine will literally cause a number of media outlets to shut > > > their doors. As I said yesterday, I cannot envision ABC, CBS or NBC > > > continuing a nightly news broadcast if such a doctrine becomes law once > > > again. Shows that were once considered entertainment, I surmise will also > > > be open game to trial court attorneys, like for instance Gaar's example, > > > "The Late Show With David Letterman", The View with Barbara Walters and > > > that > > > red headed whore, I forget her name. Shows like Boston Legal, "24" ; *e.g > > > *.; a variety of what was once considered "entertainment" will now in the > > > New Millennium be subject to the same standards as those few conservatives > > > on talk radio. > > > > Of course, another option, is that it could very well be the demise of the > > > public airwaves, other than networks like PBS. I surmise that the > > > liability > > > of any major network would be too great, to air the kind of shows that are > > > currently on broadcast television. > > > ChiefMoonbat.jpg > > 256KViewDownload- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
