come on murky, where is free speech being denied today where the unfairness doctrine is needed? now if the dems manage to initiate this censorship, then we will truly have the lack of free speech, but right now, at this moment in time, murky, where is there a lack of free speech? where?
On Nov 14, 3:23 pm, "Keith In Tampa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 13, 2:30 am, "mike [Chief Moonbat] 532" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: great i am glad to see you are finally coming on board the free > speech for all express ! > > ======== > Here is but one example, but a good example, of why you are a > Moonbat......You cannot see the truth, even when it is laid out before you, > and why I have that rule, not to even get sucked into responding to any of > your ridiculous, ludicrous tripe. It is a waste of time to engage you in > any kind of meaningful dialogue. > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Keith In Tampa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > On Nov 11, 8:32 am, "mike [Chief Moonbat] 532" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > fish boy it has never been considered unconstitutional and that is the fact > > of the mater > > > ==== > > > The Constitutionality of the Fairness Doctrine was brought into question on > > numerous occasions not only before the Supreme Court, as Gaar just > > demonstrated, but in numerous federal District and Circuit Courts. That is > > one of the reasons for the Fairness Doctrine's demise over twenty years > > ago. > > > Today, with the way that the mainstream media has become so partisan, (and > > that is a fact, even the Washington Post as well as the New York Times, NBC > > and CBS have all recently, like this week, admitted to this fact) the > > Fairness Doctrine will literally cause a number of media outlets to shut > > their doors. As I said yesterday, I cannot envision ABC, CBS or NBC > > continuing a nightly news broadcast if such a doctrine becomes law once > > again. Shows that were once considered entertainment, I surmise will also > > be open game to trial court attorneys, like for instance Gaar's example, > > "The Late Show With David Letterman", The View with Barbara Walters and that > > red headed whore, I forget her name. Shows like Boston Legal, "24" ; *e.g > > *.; a variety of what was once considered "entertainment" will now in the > > New Millennium be subject to the same standards as those few conservatives > > on talk radio. > > > Of course, another option, is that it could very well be the demise of the > > public airwaves, other than networks like PBS. I surmise that the liability > > of any major network would be too great, to air the kind of shows that are > > currently on broadcast television. > > > > ChiefMoonbat.jpg > 256KViewDownload --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
