What action did I take that could be considered abuse? The reason I
stepped in was to *prevent* abuse. Not surprised you don't get that.

On Nov 18, 10:53 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yep, using a Thread about the "Fairness Doctrine" to point out how
> such things can be abused, even on a much smaller scale.
>
> No surprise you wouldn't get that.
>
> On Nov 18, 7:51 am, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Remember, I had not even posted today or in this thread until you
> > attacked me.
>
> > On Nov 18, 10:47 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Isn't meant to scare you wncs, just acountable.
>
> > > On Nov 18, 7:41 am, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Ooooh I'm scared to death.
>
> > > > On Nov 18, 10:39 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > I think it is time we asked an impartial observer...
>
> > > > > I'll write the Owner, and ask her to look into your actions.
>
> > > > > Your THREATS of Moderation here are disturbing.
>
> > > > > These types of posts happen in MANY Threads, yet you seem only
> > > > > interested in stopping mine.
>
> > > > > Imagine that.
>
> > > > > Looks like I may have to ask the Owner to excuse you of your Duties,
> > > > > since you seem to be trying to use them to further your Partisan ideas
> > > > > here.
>
> > > > > Watch out the threats you make wncs, you are supposed to be impartial
> > > > > when asserting Moderation, and as I have pointed out you are starting
> > > > > to use it in a Partisan manner to enforce your OPINION, and that is
> > > > > NOT something we allow as Moderators.
>
> > > > > As for a place we can discuss such things, you should have thought
> > > > > about that BEFORE you decided to assert your Moderation where it
> > > > > wasn't called for, and then made the discussion about it Public.
>
> > > > > My suggestion, at this point, is that you not do anything Moderation
> > > > > wise, I would hate to have to have the Owner remove you as a
> > > > > Moderator, like she needed to do with a couple of former Moderators.
>
> > > > > Capiche?
>
> > > > > On Nov 18, 7:33 am, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > If you have a problem with me as a moderator, there is a place to
> > > > > > address it, and it is not here. Any further hijacking of threads to
> > > > > > continue your psycho rants against me will be
> > > > > > viewed as disruptive to the board.
> > > > > > Capiche?
>
> > > > > > On Nov 18, 10:31 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Disrupt the Board?
>
> > > > > > > Are you now going to try and silence me from pointing out your
> > > > > > > Partisan use of Moderation?
>
> > > > > > > Again, no surprise there.
>
> > > > > > > As long as you are going to attempt to justify your Partisan use 
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > Moderation, I will continue to point out that is what you have 
> > > > > > > done.
>
> > > > > > > Capiche?
>
> > > > > > > Otherwise, please feel free to SHOW ME where we have EVER done 
> > > > > > > what
> > > > > > > you did the other day, as Moderators, I'll wait here.
>
> > > > > > > On Nov 18, 7:28 am, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > I have addressed all of your concerns regarding my comments the 
> > > > > > > > other
> > > > > > > > day. I'm sorry we disagree on it, especially since we usually 
> > > > > > > > agree on
> > > > > > > > matters of moderation.
> > > > > > > > Now, can we move on, or are you going to continue disrupting 
> > > > > > > > the board
> > > > > > > > with petty bullshit?
>
> > > > > > > > On Nov 18, 10:25 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > On Nov 18, 7:20 am, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > What brought on this attack?! I explained to you why I 
> > > > > > > > > > stepped in when
> > > > > > > > > > I did.
>
> > > > > > > > > And I explained why it was inappropriate.
>
> > > > > > > > > No surprise you won't admit it and continue to try and defend 
> > > > > > > > > your
> > > > > > > > > actions.
>
> > > > > > > > > > I've seen such accusations be used against someone later, 
> > > > > > > > > > and I
> > > > > > > > > > aimed to prevent Hollywood from that, especially since the 
> > > > > > > > > > accusation
> > > > > > > > > > was false.
>
> > > > > > > > > They were NOT False, and you have YET to address the argument 
> > > > > > > > > made
> > > > > > > > > that proves they were justified.
>
> > > > > > > > > Imagine that, you expect us to take your word for it, rather 
> > > > > > > > > than
> > > > > > > > > having to make a cogent argument to support your OPINION.
>
> > > > > > > > > Now, please SHOW ME where we Moderate OPINIONS, I'll waut 
> > > > > > > > > here.
>
> > > > > > > > > > Now, I have explained this to you. Are you going to 
> > > > > > > > > > continue to attack
> > > > > > > > > > me daily in thread where I haven't even posted?!
>
> > > > > > > > > I will as long as you continue to try and assert your OPINION 
> > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > Moderation.
>
> > > > > > > > > > Crybaby.
>
> > > > > > > > > It is called making you accountable.
>
> > > > > > > > > No surprise you don't like it.
>
> > > > > > > > > > Don't you have a plane to catch?
>
> > > > > > > > > All in good time, even when I do it won't stop me from 
> > > > > > > > > pointing out
> > > > > > > > > your Partisan use of Moderation.
>
> > > > > > > > > Capiche?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to