Please show when I have taken any action as moderator that was inappropriate. Again, it is painfully obvious that you were okay with my performance as a moderator until your post-election psycho meltdown. Everyone can see that.
On Nov 18, 10:57 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You used your position to assert your OPINION as some sort of Fact, > where Moderation was not called for. > > No surprise you continue to try to justify such actions. > > I am just trying to make sure you never do it again. > > Your trying to justify it only asserts you will in fact do it whenever > youplease, and that disturbs me. > > On Nov 18, 7:55 am, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > What action did I take that could be considered abuse? The reason I > > stepped in was to *prevent* abuse. Not surprised you don't get that. > > > On Nov 18, 10:53 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Yep, using a Thread about the "Fairness Doctrine" to point out how > > > such things can be abused, even on a much smaller scale. > > > > No surprise you wouldn't get that. > > > > On Nov 18, 7:51 am, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Remember, I had not even posted today or in this thread until you > > > > attacked me. > > > > > On Nov 18, 10:47 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Isn't meant to scare you wncs, just acountable. > > > > > > On Nov 18, 7:41 am, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Ooooh I'm scared to death. > > > > > > > On Nov 18, 10:39 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I think it is time we asked an impartial observer... > > > > > > > > I'll write the Owner, and ask her to look into your actions. > > > > > > > > Your THREATS of Moderation here are disturbing. > > > > > > > > These types of posts happen in MANY Threads, yet you seem only > > > > > > > interested in stopping mine. > > > > > > > > Imagine that. > > > > > > > > Looks like I may have to ask the Owner to excuse you of your > > > > > > > Duties, > > > > > > > since you seem to be trying to use them to further your Partisan > > > > > > > ideas > > > > > > > here. > > > > > > > > Watch out the threats you make wncs, you are supposed to be > > > > > > > impartial > > > > > > > when asserting Moderation, and as I have pointed out you are > > > > > > > starting > > > > > > > to use it in a Partisan manner to enforce your OPINION, and that > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > NOT something we allow as Moderators. > > > > > > > > As for a place we can discuss such things, you should have thought > > > > > > > about that BEFORE you decided to assert your Moderation where it > > > > > > > wasn't called for, and then made the discussion about it Public. > > > > > > > > My suggestion, at this point, is that you not do anything > > > > > > > Moderation > > > > > > > wise, I would hate to have to have the Owner remove you as a > > > > > > > Moderator, like she needed to do with a couple of former > > > > > > > Moderators. > > > > > > > > Capiche? > > > > > > > > On Nov 18, 7:33 am, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > If you have a problem with me as a moderator, there is a place > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > address it, and it is not here. Any further hijacking of > > > > > > > > threads to > > > > > > > > continue your psycho rants against me will be > > > > > > > > viewed as disruptive to the board. > > > > > > > > Capiche? > > > > > > > > > On Nov 18, 10:31 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Disrupt the Board? > > > > > > > > > > Are you now going to try and silence me from pointing out your > > > > > > > > > Partisan use of Moderation? > > > > > > > > > > Again, no surprise there. > > > > > > > > > > As long as you are going to attempt to justify your Partisan > > > > > > > > > use of > > > > > > > > > Moderation, I will continue to point out that is what you > > > > > > > > > have done. > > > > > > > > > > Capiche? > > > > > > > > > > Otherwise, please feel free to SHOW ME where we have EVER > > > > > > > > > done what > > > > > > > > > you did the other day, as Moderators, I'll wait here. > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 18, 7:28 am, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I have addressed all of your concerns regarding my comments > > > > > > > > > > the other > > > > > > > > > > day. I'm sorry we disagree on it, especially since we > > > > > > > > > > usually agree on > > > > > > > > > > matters of moderation. > > > > > > > > > > Now, can we move on, or are you going to continue > > > > > > > > > > disrupting the board > > > > > > > > > > with petty bullshit? > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 18, 10:25 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 18, 7:20 am, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > What brought on this attack?! I explained to you why I > > > > > > > > > > > > stepped in when > > > > > > > > > > > > I did. > > > > > > > > > > > > And I explained why it was inappropriate. > > > > > > > > > > > > No surprise you won't admit it and continue to try and > > > > > > > > > > > defend your > > > > > > > > > > > actions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've seen such accusations be used against someone > > > > > > > > > > > > later, and I > > > > > > > > > > > > aimed to prevent Hollywood from that, especially since > > > > > > > > > > > > the accusation > > > > > > > > > > > > was false. > > > > > > > > > > > > They were NOT False, and you have YET to address the > > > > > > > > > > > argument made > > > > > > > > > > > that proves they were justified. > > > > > > > > > > > > Imagine that, you expect us to take your word for it, > > > > > > > > > > > rather than > > > > > > > > > > > having to make a cogent argument to support your OPINION. > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, please SHOW ME where we Moderate OPINIONS, I'll waut > > > > > > > > > > > here. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, I have explained this to you. Are you going to > > > > > > > > > > > > continue to attack > > > > > > > > > > > > me daily in thread where I haven't even posted?! > > > > > > > > > > > > I will as long as you continue to try and assert your > > > > > > > > > > > OPINION in > > > > > > > > > > > Moderation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Crybaby. > > > > > > > > > > > > It is called making you accountable. > > > > > > > > > > > > No surprise you don't like it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Don't you have a plane to catch? > > > > > > > > > > > > All in good time, even when I do it won't stop me from > > > > > > > > > > > pointing out > > > > > > > > > > > your Partisan use of Moderation. > > > > > > > > > > > > Capiche?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
