i have to admit i could hardly stop laughing when i saw that garr had
accused someone else of Partisan use of Moderation  ! that is really
very funny almost as funny as mark calling the fairness doctrine the
censorship doctrine .

On Nov 18, 10:33 am, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you have a problem with me as a moderator, there is a place to
> address it, and it is not here. Any further hijacking of threads to
> continue your psycho rants against me will be
> viewed as disruptive to the board.
> Capiche?
>
> On Nov 18, 10:31 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Disrupt the Board?
>
> > Are you now going to try and silence me from pointing out your
> > Partisan use of Moderation?
>
> > Again, no surprise there.
>
> > As long as you are going to attempt to justify your Partisan use of
> > Moderation, I will continue to point out that is what you have done.
>
> > Capiche?
>
> > Otherwise, please feel free to SHOW ME where we have EVER done what
> > you did the other day, as Moderators, I'll wait here.
>
> > On Nov 18, 7:28 am, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > I have addressed all of your concerns regarding my comments the other
> > > day. I'm sorry we disagree on it, especially since we usually agree on
> > > matters of moderation.
> > > Now, can we move on, or are you going to continue disrupting the board
> > > with petty bullshit?
>
> > > On Nov 18, 10:25 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > On Nov 18, 7:20 am, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > What brought on this attack?! I explained to you why I stepped in when
> > > > > I did.
>
> > > > And I explained why it was inappropriate.
>
> > > > No surprise you won't admit it and continue to try and defend your
> > > > actions.
>
> > > > > I've seen such accusations be used against someone later, and I
> > > > > aimed to prevent Hollywood from that, especially since the accusation
> > > > > was false.
>
> > > > They were NOT False, and you have YET to address the argument made
> > > > that proves they were justified.
>
> > > > Imagine that, you expect us to take your word for it, rather than
> > > > having to make a cogent argument to support your OPINION.
>
> > > > Now, please SHOW ME where we Moderate OPINIONS, I'll waut here.
>
> > > > > Now, I have explained this to you. Are you going to continue to attack
> > > > > me daily in thread where I haven't even posted?!
>
> > > > I will as long as you continue to try and assert your OPINION in
> > > > Moderation.
>
> > > > > Crybaby.
>
> > > > It is called making you accountable.
>
> > > > No surprise you don't like it.
>
> > > > > Don't you have a plane to catch?
>
> > > > All in good time, even when I do it won't stop me from pointing out
> > > > your Partisan use of Moderation.
>
> > > > Capiche?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to