Oh I do Mikey. Almost 34 years and counting. How many marriages and beds have you been kicked out of? Must suck that strong women don't bow down to your power trips.
On Dec 13, 8:50 am, mike 532 <[email protected]> wrote: > maybe you should give that love to something or someone who feels the > same way about you . instead of sniffing after strangers ! > > On Dec 13, 9:37 am, NavyBrat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > :-) I do love all kinds of dogs! > > > On Dec 13, 7:26 am, mike 532 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > " and they called it puppy loveeeeeeeeeeeeeee! " > > > > On Dec 13, 9:25 am, NavyBrat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I Am your master! Owned! > > > > > On Dec 13, 7:21 am, mike 532 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > go home puppy your master is calling you ! > > > > > > On Dec 13, 9:17 am, NavyBrat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Except when you wnat to curtail the free speech of others. How > > > > > > noble! > > > > > > > On Dec 13, 5:57 am, mike 532 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > hey just doing my part to keep America free ! > > > > > > > > On Dec 13, 7:53 am, mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > come on murky, you are either a sarah stalker, but judging by > > > > > > > > all your > > > > > > > > anti female posts, I would guess you are a limp wrister which > > > > > > > > means > > > > > > > > you do not stalk women . so that leaves fear, and you fools > > > > > > > > know that > > > > > > > > she would kick your boy out of the black house if she ran > > > > > > > > against > > > > > > > > him. so we will be afforded the opportunity to see you post > > > > > > > > these > > > > > > > > lies and innuendos for the next 4 yrs. > > > > > > > > > On Dec 13, 3:19 am, mike 532 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > poor marky ! there is nothing to fear from Palin she is and > > > > > > > > > was just > > > > > > > > > a distraction but i do intend to keep on posting the facts > > > > > > > > > about her > > > > > > > > > as they come up until she is out of office and forced to stay > > > > > > > > > out of > > > > > > > > > any other office . she is corrupt and unfit for public office > > > > > > > > > ! > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 12, 5:48 pm, mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > the liberal retards such as murky and his ilk will continue > > > > > > > > > > to attack > > > > > > > > > > sarah for the next 4 yrs, because of all the conservative > > > > > > > > > > republicans > > > > > > > > > > out there, they fear her the most. > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 12, 5:25 pm, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Which advisor on Obama inner circle talked with the > > > > > > > > > > > Illinois > > > > > > > > > > > governor??? Are they corrupt??? If they knew about a > > > > > > > > > > > pay to play > > > > > > > > > > > scheme and did nothing are they corrupt??? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 12, 11:46 am, mike 532 <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > it is not about the election it is about a corrupt > > > > > > > > > > > > politician who is > > > > > > > > > > > > unfit for office any office ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 12, 9:48 am, Kamakazee <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sweet Jesus, when will you and Letterman realize the > > > > > > > > > > > > > election is over? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And ya realize your CIC Elect is having a bit of > > > > > > > > > > > > > difficulty explaining > > > > > > > > > > > > > that whole mess in IL right? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 12, 7:26 am, mike 532 > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Palin used these nonofficial accounts for official > > > > > > > > > > > > > > business, in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > violation of Alaska state open records > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rules,http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2008/12/11290_palin_emai... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would You Pay $10,000 for Sarah Palin's Emails? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How > > > > > > > > > > > > > > much would you pay for access to the emails Sarah > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Palin has sent and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > received as governor of Alaska? Would you part with > > > > > > > > > > > > > > $10,000 for them? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's basically what her office is asking. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > During the general election, I filed an open > > > > > > > > > > > > > > records act request for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > all emails that had gone to and from Palin in her > > > > > > > > > > > > > > official capacity. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And Alaska citizen watchdog Andrée McLeod, who had > > > > > > > > > > > > > > long been > > > > > > > > > > > > > > peppering > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Palin's office with similar requests, did the same. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At a time when > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Palin was on the hot seat as Senator John McCain's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vice presidential > > > > > > > > > > > > > > running mate, her office replied that it would cost > > > > > > > > > > > > > > over $65,000 to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > round up all of Palin's emails and that Mother > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jones would have to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cover this cost. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The problem: Palin had used at least two > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nonofficial email accounts > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (such as a Yahoo account) to conduct her state > > > > > > > > > > > > > > business. Given that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the governor's office did not have access to those > > > > > > > > > > > > > > accounts, its > > > > > > > > > > > > > > information specialists had concluded that the only > > > > > > > > > > > > > > way to gather all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > her emails would be to search the state email > > > > > > > > > > > > > > accounts for about 70 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > people who worked within the executive offices of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the governor and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > look for emails to and from Palin's nonofficial > > > > > > > > > > > > > > email accounts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Palin's office estimated it would cost almost a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thousand dollars for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > each search of these 70 or so official accounts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It seemed absurd and unfair for Palin's office to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > pass the cost of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this search on to those who had requested Palin's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > emails. After all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > she should have been using her state email account > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for state > > > > > > > > > > > > > > business. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In a letter to her office, I maintained that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > requesters should not be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > forced to pay for Palin's inappropriate use of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nonofficial accounts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Palin's office eventually agreed, deciding it would > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not charge fees > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for the extensive search operation that would be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > necessary to compile > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Palin's emails. In early October, it informed me > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that it would begin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reviewing Palin's official emails and gather the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > emails related to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > state business that were sent to and from her > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nonofficial accounts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All for no charge. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But there was a rub: this whole process could be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > expected to take > > > > > > > > > > > > > > weeks. That meant that none of her emails (from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > either official or > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nonofficial accounts) would become public prior to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the November 4 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > election. Because Palin had used these nonofficial > > > > > > > > > > > > > > accounts for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > official business, arguably in violation of Alaska > > > > > > > > > > > > > > state open records > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rules, she had managed (wittingly or not) to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > orchestrate the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > functional equivalent of a cover-up--at least, a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > temporary one. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On December 5, Linda Perez, Palin's administrative > > > > > > > > > > > > > > director, sent me > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > letter noting that Alaska's Department of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Administration had > > > > > > > > > > > > > > completed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the job of assembling Palin's emails into a single > > > > > > > > > > > > > > account. "The > > > > > > > > > > > > > > account is now available for records production > > > > > > > > > > > > > > purposes," she wrote. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In all, there are approximately 25,700 emails in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this account, the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > letter reported. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But they are not yet ready for release, and now > > > > > > > > > > > > > > here come the real > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fees. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Each email, Perez wrote, has to be opened and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > printed separately in a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "fairly time-consuming" process. The cost for doing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this: $3,955.23. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The calculations: a staffer paid $15.39 an hour > > > > > > > > > > > > > > could review about > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 100 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > emails per hour. And Perez said that Mother Jones > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and McLeod would > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have to pay for this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The process, though, would not end there. Once > > > > > > > > > > > > > > these emails are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > printed out, the records would then be sent to the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > state's Department > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of Law (which is headed by a Palin appointee) for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "privilege review." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That is, individual emails could be withheld on the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > basis of various > > > > > > > > > > > > > > exemptions. (When the Palin administration > > > > > > > > > > > > > > responded to an earlier > > > > > > > > > > > > > > email request from McLeod regarding two Palin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > staffers, it withheld > > > > > > > > > > > > > > over 1100 emails, relying on questionable > > > > > > > > > > > > > > exemptions.) So there's no > > > > > > > > > > > > > > guaranteeing how many of these emails will be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > released. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And there's more. Once the legal review is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > finished, the emails > > > > > > > > > > > > > > deemed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > appropriate for release will have to be copied, and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Palin's office > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will charge a duplication fee. In earlier > > > > > > > > > > > > > > correspondences, Palin's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > office indicated the fee could be over 25 cents a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > page. If about > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 25,000 emails (a page each) are cleared for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > release, the copying fee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > could top $6,000. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ten thousand dollars to see Palin emails reviewed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by Palin's legal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > department? Is it worth it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Other media outfits have submitted requests for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some of Palin's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > emails > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (based on subjects). It may be possible to create a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > consortium of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > groups to share the costs. I will be talking to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > representatives of > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
