My home is so well run by me and hubby that it gives me plenty of free time to 'play' with you. Hell...I'm thinkin gabout making it a board game! LOL! I'm sure I could make some serious dough with that. Wonder if Hasbroe would be interested?
On Dec 13, 9:42 am, mike 532 <[email protected]> wrote: > what a strange way to please yourself stalking a stranger ! well > that kind of thing does seem to please a certain segment of the > population . but have to tell you if you put even half as much energy > or time into your home life you might feel different about > things . > On Dec 13, 11:35 am, NavyBrat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Nah...Its kind of a gift to me too...since I enjoy it so much. > > > On Dec 13, 9:33 am, mike 532 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > thank you very much ! but i just can't " except " any presents from > > > you . > > > maybe you could give it to your other half instead . > > > On Dec 13, 11:28 am, NavyBrat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Concider it my Christmas gift to you. > > > > > On Dec 13, 9:24 am, mike 532 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > " Oh I do Mikey " > > > > > if that were true you wouldn't be chasing around after me like a love > > > > > sick puppy . > > > > > On Dec 13, 11:16 am, NavyBrat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Oh I do Mikey. Almost 34 years and counting. How many marriages and > > > > > > beds have you been kicked out of? Must suck that strong women don't > > > > > > bow down to your power trips. > > > > > > > On Dec 13, 8:50 am, mike 532 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > maybe you should give that love to something or someone who feels > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > same way about you . instead of sniffing after strangers ! > > > > > > > > On Dec 13, 9:37 am, NavyBrat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > :-) I do love all kinds of dogs! > > > > > > > > > On Dec 13, 7:26 am, mike 532 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > " and they called it puppy loveeeeeeeeeeeeeee! " > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 13, 9:25 am, NavyBrat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I Am your master! Owned! > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 13, 7:21 am, mike 532 <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > go home puppy your master is calling you ! > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 13, 9:17 am, NavyBrat <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Except when you wnat to curtail the free speech of > > > > > > > > > > > > others. How noble! > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 13, 5:57 am, mike 532 <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hey just doing my part to keep America free ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 13, 7:53 am, mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > come on murky, you are either a sarah stalker, but > > > > > > > > > > > > > > judging by all your > > > > > > > > > > > > > > anti female posts, I would guess you are a limp > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrister which means > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you do not stalk women . so that leaves fear, and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you fools know that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > she would kick your boy out of the black house if > > > > > > > > > > > > > > she ran against > > > > > > > > > > > > > > him. so we will be afforded the opportunity to see > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you post these > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lies and innuendos for the next 4 yrs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 13, 3:19 am, mike 532 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > poor marky ! there is nothing to fear from Palin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > she is and was just > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a distraction but i do intend to keep on posting > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the facts about her > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as they come up until she is out of office and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > forced to stay out of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > any other office . she is corrupt and unfit for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public office ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 12, 5:48 pm, mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the liberal retards such as murky and his ilk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will continue to attack > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sarah for the next 4 yrs, because of all the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > conservative republicans > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out there, they fear her the most. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 12, 5:25 pm, jgg1000a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which advisor on Obama inner circle talked > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with the Illinois > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > governor??? Are they corrupt??? If they > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > knew about a pay to play > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > scheme and did nothing are they corrupt??? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 12, 11:46 am, mike 532 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it is not about the election it is about a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > corrupt politician who is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > unfit for office any office ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 12, 9:48 am, Kamakazee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sweet Jesus, when will you and Letterman > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > realize the election is over? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And ya realize your CIC Elect is having a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bit of difficulty explaining > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that whole mess in IL right? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 12, 7:26 am, mike 532 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Palin used these nonofficial accounts > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for official business, in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > violation of Alaska state open records > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rules,http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2008/12/11290_palin_emai... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would You Pay $10,000 for Sarah Palin's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Emails? How > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > much would you pay for access to the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > emails Sarah Palin has sent and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > received as governor of Alaska? Would > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you part with $10,000 for them? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's basically what her office is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > asking. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > During the general election, I filed an > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > open records act request for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > all emails that had gone to and from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Palin in her official capacity. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And Alaska citizen watchdog Andrée > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > McLeod, who had long been > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > peppering > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Palin's office with similar requests, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > did the same. At a time when > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Palin was on the hot seat as Senator > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > John McCain's vice presidential > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > running mate, her office replied that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it would cost over $65,000 to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > round up all of Palin's emails and that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mother Jones would have to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cover this cost. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The problem: Palin had used at least > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > two nonofficial email accounts > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (such as a Yahoo account) to conduct > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > her state business. Given that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the governor's office did not have > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > access to those accounts, its > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > information specialists had concluded > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that the only way to gather all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > her emails would be to search the state > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > email accounts for about 70 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > people who worked within the executive > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > offices of the governor and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > look for emails to and from Palin's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nonofficial email accounts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Palin's office estimated it would cost > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > almost a thousand dollars for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > each search of these 70 or so official > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > accounts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It seemed absurd and unfair for Palin's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > office to pass the cost of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this search on to those who had > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > requested Palin's emails. After all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > she should have been using her state > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > email account for state > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > business. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In a letter to her office, I maintained > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that requesters should not be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > forced to pay for Palin's inappropriate > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > use of nonofficial accounts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Palin's office eventually agreed, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > deciding it would not charge fees > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for the extensive search operation that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would be necessary to compile > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Palin's emails. In early October, it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > informed me that it would begin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reviewing Palin's official emails and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > gather the emails related to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > state business that were sent to and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from her nonofficial accounts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All for no charge. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But there was a rub: this whole process > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > could be expected to take > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > weeks. That meant that none of her > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > emails (from either official or > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nonofficial accounts) would become > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public prior to the November 4 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > election. Because Palin had used these > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nonofficial accounts for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > official business, arguably in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > violation of Alaska state open records > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rules, she had managed (wittingly or > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not) to orchestrate the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > functional equivalent of a cover-up--at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > least, a temporary one. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On December 5, Linda Perez, Palin's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > administrative director, sent me > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > letter noting that Alaska's Department > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of Administration had > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > completed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the job of assembling Palin's emails > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > into a single account. "The > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > account is now available for records > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > production purposes," she wrote. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In all, there are approximately 25,700 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > emails in this account, the > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
