Nah...Its kind of a gift to me too...since I enjoy it so much. On Dec 13, 9:33 am, mike 532 <[email protected]> wrote: > thank you very much ! but i just can't " except " any presents from > you . > maybe you could give it to your other half instead . > On Dec 13, 11:28 am, NavyBrat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Concider it my Christmas gift to you. > > > On Dec 13, 9:24 am, mike 532 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > " Oh I do Mikey " > > > if that were true you wouldn't be chasing around after me like a love > > > sick puppy . > > > On Dec 13, 11:16 am, NavyBrat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Oh I do Mikey. Almost 34 years and counting. How many marriages and > > > > beds have you been kicked out of? Must suck that strong women don't > > > > bow down to your power trips. > > > > > On Dec 13, 8:50 am, mike 532 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > maybe you should give that love to something or someone who feels the > > > > > same way about you . instead of sniffing after strangers ! > > > > > > On Dec 13, 9:37 am, NavyBrat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > :-) I do love all kinds of dogs! > > > > > > > On Dec 13, 7:26 am, mike 532 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > " and they called it puppy loveeeeeeeeeeeeeee! " > > > > > > > > On Dec 13, 9:25 am, NavyBrat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I Am your master! Owned! > > > > > > > > > On Dec 13, 7:21 am, mike 532 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > go home puppy your master is calling you ! > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 13, 9:17 am, NavyBrat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Except when you wnat to curtail the free speech of others. > > > > > > > > > > How noble! > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 13, 5:57 am, mike 532 <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > hey just doing my part to keep America free ! > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 13, 7:53 am, mark <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > come on murky, you are either a sarah stalker, but > > > > > > > > > > > > judging by all your > > > > > > > > > > > > anti female posts, I would guess you are a limp wrister > > > > > > > > > > > > which means > > > > > > > > > > > > you do not stalk women . so that leaves fear, and you > > > > > > > > > > > > fools know that > > > > > > > > > > > > she would kick your boy out of the black house if she > > > > > > > > > > > > ran against > > > > > > > > > > > > him. so we will be afforded the opportunity to see you > > > > > > > > > > > > post these > > > > > > > > > > > > lies and innuendos for the next 4 yrs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 13, 3:19 am, mike 532 <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > poor marky ! there is nothing to fear from Palin she > > > > > > > > > > > > > is and was just > > > > > > > > > > > > > a distraction but i do intend to keep on posting the > > > > > > > > > > > > > facts about her > > > > > > > > > > > > > as they come up until she is out of office and forced > > > > > > > > > > > > > to stay out of > > > > > > > > > > > > > any other office . she is corrupt and unfit for > > > > > > > > > > > > > public office ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 12, 5:48 pm, mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the liberal retards such as murky and his ilk will > > > > > > > > > > > > > > continue to attack > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sarah for the next 4 yrs, because of all the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > conservative republicans > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out there, they fear her the most. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 12, 5:25 pm, jgg1000a <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which advisor on Obama inner circle talked with > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Illinois > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > governor??? Are they corrupt??? If they knew > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > about a pay to play > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > scheme and did nothing are they corrupt??? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 12, 11:46 am, mike 532 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it is not about the election it is about a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > corrupt politician who is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > unfit for office any office ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 12, 9:48 am, Kamakazee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sweet Jesus, when will you and Letterman > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > realize the election is over? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And ya realize your CIC Elect is having a bit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of difficulty explaining > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that whole mess in IL right? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 12, 7:26 am, mike 532 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Palin used these nonofficial accounts for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > official business, in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > violation of Alaska state open records > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rules,http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2008/12/11290_palin_emai... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would You Pay $10,000 for Sarah Palin's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Emails? How > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > much would you pay for access to the emails > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sarah Palin has sent and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > received as governor of Alaska? Would you > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > part with $10,000 for them? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's basically what her office is asking. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > During the general election, I filed an > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > open records act request for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > all emails that had gone to and from Palin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in her official capacity. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And Alaska citizen watchdog Andrée McLeod, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who had long been > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > peppering > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Palin's office with similar requests, did > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the same. At a time when > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Palin was on the hot seat as Senator John > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > McCain's vice presidential > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > running mate, her office replied that it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would cost over $65,000 to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > round up all of Palin's emails and that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mother Jones would have to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cover this cost. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The problem: Palin had used at least two > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nonofficial email accounts > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (such as a Yahoo account) to conduct her > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > state business. Given that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the governor's office did not have access > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to those accounts, its > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > information specialists had concluded that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the only way to gather all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > her emails would be to search the state > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > email accounts for about 70 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > people who worked within the executive > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > offices of the governor and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > look for emails to and from Palin's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nonofficial email accounts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Palin's office estimated it would cost > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > almost a thousand dollars for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > each search of these 70 or so official > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > accounts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It seemed absurd and unfair for Palin's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > office to pass the cost of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this search on to those who had requested > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Palin's emails. After all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > she should have been using her state email > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > account for state > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > business. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In a letter to her office, I maintained > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that requesters should not be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > forced to pay for Palin's inappropriate use > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of nonofficial accounts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Palin's office eventually agreed, deciding > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it would not charge fees > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for the extensive search operation that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would be necessary to compile > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Palin's emails. In early October, it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > informed me that it would begin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reviewing Palin's official emails and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > gather the emails related to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > state business that were sent to and from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > her nonofficial accounts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All for no charge. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But there was a rub: this whole process > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > could be expected to take > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > weeks. That meant that none of her emails > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (from either official or > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nonofficial accounts) would become public > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > prior to the November 4 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > election. Because Palin had used these > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nonofficial accounts for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > official business, arguably in violation of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Alaska state open records > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rules, she had managed (wittingly or not) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to orchestrate the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > functional equivalent of a cover-up--at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > least, a temporary one. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On December 5, Linda Perez, Palin's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > administrative director, sent me > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > letter noting that Alaska's Department of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Administration had > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > completed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the job of assembling Palin's emails into a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > single account. "The > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > account is now available for records > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > production purposes," she wrote. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In all, there are approximately 25,700 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > emails in this account, the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > letter reported. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But they are not yet ready for release, and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > now here come the real > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fees. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Each email, Perez wrote, has to be opened > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and printed separately in a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "fairly time-consuming" process. The cost > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for doing this: $3,955.23. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The calculations: a staffer paid $15.39 an > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hour could review about > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 100 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > emails per hour. And Perez said that Mother > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jones and McLeod would > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have to pay for this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The process, though, would not end there. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Once these emails are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > printed out, the records would then be sent > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to the state's Department > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
