JC, I was merely pointing out the absurdity of the notion that if
you're not adopting children you can't argue against performing late
term abortions.

On Jan 13, 12:54 pm, "J.C." <[email protected]> wrote:
> You are comparing two different entities.  There are too many
> unwanted, and unadoptable, children as it is.  I personally could not
> choose to have an abortion, but I do not know, nor understand, the
> reasoning of another person, and why this person would choose to have
> one.  There are circumstances that may surround the issue which we are
> not apprised of, and therefore, cannot make a reasonable decision in
> reference to.
>
> As for the elderly - again, that should be a personal decision, free
> from the controls of the general public.  If someone is terminal, and
> chooses to end his life, then his choice should be respected.
> Bringing up convicted murderers doesn't even make sense; they are
> incarcerated for a reason, and not all liberals oppose capital
> punishment - I don't.
>
> On Jan 13, 10:39 am, frankg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > TAO,
>
> > By this logic; must we assume responsibility for the elderly on life
> > support in order to argue against euthanasia?  Must we take home or
> > personally fund the incarceration of a convicted murderer in order to
> > oppose capital punishment?
>
> > On Jan 13, 12:03 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Quakko, how many have YOU adopted to support your position ??
>
> > > On Jan 13, 6:00 am, Ohio mark <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > when will your blood lust be satisfied murky?  when there are 50
> > > > million bodies tossed in dumpsters?  60, 70, 100 million?  nazi.
>
> > > > On Jan 13, 6:31 am, "florida mike  !" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Thank god ! we still have doctors like this one who are willing to
> > > > > treat women despite the Nazi like attacks by the right wing of the
> > > > > GOP
>
> > > > > On Jan 13, 6:25 am, Ohio mark <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > While Kansas doctor George Tiller is still fighting accusations of
> > > > > > illegally aborting 19 viable babies, an undercover sting operation
> > > > > > conducted by a pro-life organization revealed his clinic 
> > > > > > intentionally
> > > > > > underestimating fetal age and viability to dodge state laws.
>
> > > > > > According to a sworn statement, a pregnant mother calling herself
> > > > > > "Shaye" received a sonogram from Tiller's clinic determining her 
> > > > > > baby
> > > > > > was beyond the allowed legal age of abortion, but the test's
> > > > > > administrator "threw it into a trashcan" and recalculated a lesser
> > > > > > gestational age. The clinic scheduled Shaye for an abortion four 
> > > > > > days
> > > > > > later.
>
> > > > > > Shaye, working undercover with the pro-life organization Operation
> > > > > > Rescue, later that day received two additional sonograms from other
> > > > > > medical centers, both showing the baby beyond the legal abortion 
> > > > > > age.
> > > > > > Further, even at the age recalculated by Tiller's clinic, the 
> > > > > > abortion
> > > > > > four days later would have still been beyond the age of viability.
>
> > > > > > "This evidence warrants further investigation by law enforcement
> > > > > > authorities," said Operation Rescue President Troy Newman in a
> > > > > > statement on ChristianNewsWire. "This is convincing proof that, in
> > > > > > spite of already facing 19 criminal charges, Tiller continues to 
> > > > > > flout
> > > > > > the law to the danger of women and their babies."
>
> > > > > > As WND reported, Tiller, whose abortion work was featured in a 
> > > > > > recent
> > > > > > profile by WND columnist Jack Cashill, faces accusations for 
> > > > > > aborting
> > > > > > viable babies without obtaining the legally required, independent
> > > > > > second opinion affirming the medical necessity for late-term
> > > > > > abortions.
>
> > > > > >http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=85944-Hidequotedtext
> > > > > > -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to